Academic programs focusing on Public Administration (PA) in Czechia and Slovakia have recently faced a decline in demand. This situation threatens the existence of these programs and, consequently, the availability of skilled public administration servants. Understanding the causes of this problem is a prerequisite for mitigating its impact. The study aims to contribute to the development of the Public Sector Motivation concept by exploring how value orientations among youth influence their perception of PA and their interest in pursuing a career in the public sector. The research uses primary data from surveys conducted among secondary school students (237 Czech respondents, 96 Slovak respondents). The findings indicate that respondents in both countries generally hold negative perceptions of PA. Coupled with a divergence in value-driven motivation between countries, the study helps explain the continuing decline in demand for PA-oriented study programs in both countries.
AllisonCh. W. (1984) Bureaucratic personality and organisation structure. University of Leeds.
2.
AndersenL. B.JørgensenT. B.KjeldsenA. M.PedersenL. H.VrangbækK. (2013). Public values and public service motivation: Conceptual and empirical relationships. American Review of Public Administration, 43(3), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012440031
3.
AndresováN.HusákJ.Fishbone VlčkováV. (2021). Hodnoty mladých: porovnání hodnot a postojů Čechů a Slováků. Research project of ČRDM & RMS (Czech Concil of Children and Youth, Slovak Youth Council). https://hodnotymladych.org/2021/12/30/hodnoty-mladych/
4.
BattaglioR. P.Jr.FrenchP. E. (2016). Public service motivation, public management reform, and organizational socialization: Testing the effects of employment at-will and agency on PSM among municipal employees. Public Personnel Management, 45(2), 123–147.
5.
BouckaertG.Van de WalleS.KampenJ. K. (2005). Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 229–240.
6.
BozemanB.HalR. (1998) Organizational rules and the “bureaucratic personality.”American Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 163–189.
7.
BozemanB.SuX. (2012, April11–13). Public service motivation concepts: Aspirational theory in public administration [Conference session]. 16th Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management, Rome, Italy.
8.
BrænderM.AndersenL. B. (2013). Does deployment to war affect public service motivation? A panel study of soldiers before and after their service in Afghanistan. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 466–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12046
9.
BrewerG. A. (2003). Building social capital: Civic attitudes and behavior of public servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 5–26.
10.
BrewerG. A.RitzA.VandenabeeleW. (2012). Introduction to a symposium on public service motivation: An international sampling of research. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.635457
11.
BrightL. (2008). Does public service motivation really make a difference on the job satisfaction and turnover intentions of public employees?American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008317248
12.
BrightL. (2011). Does public service motivation affect the occupation choices of public employees?Public Personnel Management, 40(1), 11–24.
13.
BrombergD. E.CharbonneauÉ. (2020). Public service motivation, personality, and the hiring decisions of public managers: An experimental study. Public Personnel Management, 49(2), 193–217.
14.
CarpenterJ.DoverspikeD.MiguelR. F. (2012). Public service motivation as a predictor of attraction to the public sector. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.004
15.
ChristensenR. K.WrightB. E. (2012, April11–13). Does the pool of Narcissus reflect public service motivation? Evidence from municipal employees [Paper presentation]. 16th Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management, Rome, Italy.
16.
ClerkinR. M.CoggburnJ. D. (2012). The dimensions of public service motivation and sector work preferences. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(3), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X11421424
17.
ClerkinR. M.PaynterS. R.TaylorJ. K. (2009). Public service motivation in undergraduate giving and volunteering decisions. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(6), 675–698.
18.
DemmkeC. (2019). The legitimacy of civil services in the 21st century. Oxford Encyclopedia of Public Administration. Oxford University Press.
19.
DinhofK.NeoS.BertramI.BouwmanR.De BoerN.SzydlowskiG.WillemsJ.TummersL. (2023). The threat of appearing lazy, inefficient, and slow? Stereotype threat in the public sector. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1941–1962.
20.
DufaultA.MacDonaldK. B.SchermerJ. A. (2023). The public sector personality: The effects of personality on public sector interest for men and women. Administrative Sciences, 13(7), 158.
21.
DžinićJ. (2017, July10–15). Prospects of administrative profession in Croatia and neighbouring countries. [Paper presentation]. International Scientific Seminar and Summer School Researching, Theorizing, and Teaching Administrative Science and Public Administration: Croatia, South East Europe, and Beyond. Dubrovnik, Croatia.
22.
ElliottI. C.BottomK. A.O’ConnorK. (2023). The status of public administration teaching in the UK. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 29(3), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2023.2202609
GabrisG. T.SimoG. (1995). Public sector motivation as an independent variable affecting career decisions. Public Personnel Management, 24(1), 33–51.
28.
HenstraD.McGowanR. A. (2016). Millennials and public service: An exploratory analysis of graduate student career motivations and expectations. Public Administration Quarterly, 40(3), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/073491491604000304
29.
HofstedeG. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). Sage.
30.
HofstedeG. (1991). Culture and organisations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.
31.
HoodC. (1991). A public management for all seasons?Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
32.
HoustonD. J. (2006). “Walking the walk” of public service motivation: Public employees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and money. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui028
33.
HuangW. L. (2022). Changes in public service motivation: Can public administration education help cultivate it?International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(4), 1176–1191. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211024334
34.
InglehartR. (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 65(4), 991–1017.
JahodaR.MalyI.NemecJ.SpacekD. (2022). The low demand for public administration programs in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: What may be behind it?Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 18(SI), 99–117.
37.
JmK (South Moravian Region). (2020). Dlouhodobý záměr vzdělávání a rozvoje vzdělávací soustavy Jihomoravského kraje 2020–24 [Long-term plan of education and development of the education system of the South Moravian Region 2020–24]. https://www.kr-jihomoravsky.cz/Default.aspx?ID=402394&TypeID=2
KeraudrenP.Van MierloH. (1997). Theories of public managementreform and their practical implications. In CoombesD.VerheijenT. (Eds.), Public management reforms. Comparative experiences from East and West (pp. 39–55). Edward Elgar Publishing.
40.
KimS. (2016). Job characteristics, public service motivation, and work performance in Korea. Gestion et Management Public, 5(1), 7–24.
41.
KimS.VandenabeeleW.WrightB. E.AndersenL. B.CeraseF. P.ChristensenR. K.DesmaraisC.KoumentaM.LeisinkP.LiuB.PalidauskaiteJ.De VivoP. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus027
42.
KnafoA.SagivL. (2004). Values and work environment: Mapping 32 occupations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(3), 255–273.
43.
KohnM. L. (1971). Bureaucratic man: A portrait and an interpretation. American Sociological Review, 36(3), 461–474.
44.
LeeG.ChoiD. L. (2016). Does public service motivation influence the intention to work in the public sector? Evidence from Korea. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(2), 145–163.
45.
LevyS.GuttmanL. (1974). Values and attitudes of Israeli high school students. Israel Institute of Applied Social Research.
46.
LightP. C. (2001). To restore and review. Now is the time to rebuild the federal public service. Government Executive, 33(14), 32–48.
47.
LightP. C. (2002). The troubled state of the federal public service. Brookings Institution.
48.
LindemanM.VerkasaloM. (2005). Measuring values with the short Schwartz’s value survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(2), 170–178.
49.
LiuB.TangN.ZhuX. (2008). Public service motivation and job satisfaction in China. International Journal of Manpower, 29(8), 684–699. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720810919304
50.
LuhmannN. (2005). The paradox of decision making. In SeidlD.HelgeBeckerK. (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (pp. 85–106). Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
51.
MalýI. (2014). Decreasing willingness to study public administration programmes: An experience from Masaryk University. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 6(2), 147–154.
52.
MatjieM. (2023). Technical advantages of bureaucracy. In FarazmandA. (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 12678–12682). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_4728-1
53.
McKinsey & Company. (2025, January29). Improving government productivity: A systemwide approach. McKinsey & Company.
54.
MertonR. K. (1987). Bureaucratic structure and personality. In ShafritzJ. M.Hyde AlbertC. (Eds.), Classics of public administration (2nd ed., p. 111). The Dorsey Press.
NemecJ.de VriesM. S. (2017). Factors and determinants of the quality of public administration in the CEE-region. In OngaroE.Van ThielS. (Eds.). The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe (pp. 865–880). Palgrave Macmillan.
NemecJ.ŠpačekD.SuwajP.ModrzejewskiA. (2012). Public management as a university discipline in New European Union member states: The central European case. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1087–1108
59.
NguyenH. T.NguyenH. M.LeT. T. H.TranQ. T. (2025). Public service motivation and career choice intentions of social work students: The roles of altruistic motivation and professional values. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1517457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1517457
60.
NiskanenW. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Aldine-Atherton.
61.
OECD. (2009). Measuring government activity. OECD Publishing.
62.
OECD. (2017). Trust in government: Ethics measures in OECD countries. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics
PandeyS. K.WrightB. E.MoynihanD. P. (2008). Public service motivation and interpersonal citizenship behavior in public organizations: Testing a preliminary model. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887947
66.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (2008a). Building theory and empirical evidence about public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887673
67.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.). (2008b). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford University Press.
68.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 367–373.
69.
PevčinP.ŠpačekD.KlimovskýD. (2019). Public administration education in the CEE countries: How has it developed during the recent decades?NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 12(2), 217–232.
PollittC.BouckaertG. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
72.
RokeachM. (1967). Value survey. Halgren Tests.
73.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. Free Press.
74.
RosenbloomD. H. (1986). The new public administration: Understanding management politics, and law in the public sector. American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400184864
RussoC.DanioniF.ZagreanI.BarniD. (2022). Changing personal values through value-manipulation tasks: A systematic literature review based on Schwartz’s theory of basic human values. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 12(7), 692–715.
77.
SagivL.SchwartzS. H. (2022). Personal values across cultures. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 517–546.
78.
SandyC. J.GoslingS. D.SchwartzS. H.KoelkebeckT. (2017). The development and validation of brief and ultrabrief measures of values. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(5), 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1231115
79.
SchwartzS. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 1–25.
80.
SchwartzS. H. (2003). A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. In JowellR.RobertsC.FitzgeraldR.EvaG. (Eds.), Questionnaire development package of the European social survey (pp. 259–319). Sage.
StaroňováK.GajduschekG. (2016). Public administration education in CEE countries: Institutionalisation of a discipline. Policy and Society, 35(4), 351–370.
86.
StevensE. D. (1981). Barrier score and the values ascribed to selected individuals by high school students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(4), 352–358.
87.
ThompsonF.MillerH. T. (2003). New public management and bureaucracy versus business values and bureaucracy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23(4), 328–363.
88.
TuW.HsiehC. W.ChenC. A.WenB. (2024). Public service motivation, performance-contingent pay, and job satisfaction of street-level bureaucrats. Public Personnel Management, 53(2), 256–280.
UNDP. (2021). Public sector reform: Towards a better public administration. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org
91.
VandenabeeleW. (2008). Development of a public service motivation measurement scale: Corroborating and extending Perry’s measurement instrument. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887970
92.
ViganF. A.GiauqueD. (2018). Job satisfaction in African public administrations: A systematic review. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(3), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316651693
WeberM. ([1978] 2015). Bureaucracy. In WatersT.WatersD. (Eds.), Weber’s rationalism and modern society: New translations on politics, bureaucracy, and social stratification (pp. 73–128). Palgrave Macmillan.
WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of person–organization fit: Testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Administration & Society, 40(5), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399708320187
97.
YeagerS. J.HildrethW. B.MillerG. J.RabinJ. (2007). What difference does having an MPA make?Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2007.12001474
