In recent years, there has been a surge of anti-LGBTQ+ laws in the United States. These laws undoubtedly reinforce cisheteropatriarchal ideologies that heterosexuality and gender conformity are the only acceptable ways of being, while other forms of sexuality and gender identity are unnatural, immoral, and deserve punishment. Given that the workplace, mirroring the broader society, exhibits the prejudices and preconceptions that are ingrained in our cultural milieu, it is incumbent upon human resource development (HRD) education to expose students to the ways in which cisheteropatriarchy structures workplaces so, as HRD practitioners, they can work towards disrupting it.
AlexanderM. J.MohantyC. T. (1997). Genealogies, legacies, movements. Na.
2.
AlimH. S.LeeJ.Mason CarrisL.WilliamsQ. E. (2020). Language, race, and the (trans) formation of cisheteropatriarchy. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Race, 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190845995.013.16
3.
AlmazanA. N.BensonT. A.BoskeyE. R.GanorO. (2020). Associations between transgender exclusion prohibitions and insurance coverage of gender-affirming surgery. LGBT Health, 7(5), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2019.0212
BuenavistaT. L.CariagaS.CurammengE. R.McGovernE. R.Pour-KhorshidF.StovallD. O.ValdezC. (2021). A praxis of critical race love: Toward the abolition of cisheteropatriarchy and toxic masculinity in educational justice formations. Educational Studies, 57(3), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.1892683
7.
ByrdM. Y. (2014). A social justice paradigm for HRD. In Handbook of human resource development (pp. 281–298), John Wiley & Sons.
8.
CanadyV. A. (2023). Mounting anti‐LGBTQ+ bills impact mental health of youths. Mental Health Weekly, 33(15), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/mhw.33603
9.
ClaryK.GoffnettJ.KingM.HubbardT.KitchenR. (2023). “It's the Environment, Not Me”: Experiences shared by transgender and gender diverse adults living in Texas. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(3), 906–923. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22948
FattoracciE. S.KingD. D. (2022) The Need for Understanding and Addressing Microaggressions in the Workplace. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(4), 738–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221133825
13.
FreemanJ. B. (2020). Measuring and resolving LGBTQ disparities in STEM. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220943232
GithensR. P. (2015). Learning through cases. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 27(2), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20097
17.
GonzalezK. A.Pulice-FarrowL.AbreuR. L. (2022). “In the voices of people like me”: LGBTQ coping during trump’s administration. The Counseling Psychologist, 50(2), 212–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000211057199
KanpolB. (1999). Critical pedagogy: An introduction. Greenwood publishing group.
22.
KlineN. S.GrinerS. B.NeelamegamM.WebbN. J.MoralesJ. J.RhodesS. D. (2022). Responding to “Don’t say gay” laws in the US: Research priorities and considerations for health equity. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 19(4), 1397–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-022-00773-0
23.
KnightsD.KerfootD. (2004). Between representations and subjectivity: Gender binaries and the politics of organizational transformation. Gender, Work and Organization, 11(4), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2004.00241.x
24.
KolyshS. (2021). Everyday violence: The public harassment of women and LGBTQ people. Rutgers University Press.
25.
McFaddenC. (2020). Discrimination against transgender employees and jobseekers. Handbook of labor, human resources and population economics, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_35-1
26.
Moulin de SouzaE.ParkerM. (2022). Practices of freedom and the disruption of binary genders: Thinking with trans. Organization, 29(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420935602
27.
MuncasterK. (2021). Cisheteropatriarchy. In Encyclopedia of queer studies in education (pp. 87–88). Brill.
28.
Ortega-RomeroI. (2023). The legal implications of anti-LGBTQ+ curriculum laws. ERSJ Blog, 53.
29.
PoteatT.ToribioM. (2023). Implementing LGBTQ-inclusive policies for cardiology practice and the workforce. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 20(6), 365–366. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-023-00870-6
SawyerK.ThoroughgoodC.WebsterJ. (2016). Queering the gender binary: Understanding transgender workplace experiences. In Sexual orientation and transgender issues in organizations: Global perspectives on LGBT workforce diversity. Springer. (pp. 21–42).
36.
SchmidtS. W.KingK. P. (2010). Case studies and activities in adult education and human resource development. IAP.
37.
SiscoS.ValesanoM.CollinsJ. C. (2019). Social movement learning and human resource development: An agenda for a radical future. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422319827917
38.
StockemerD.WiggintonM.SundströmA. (2021). Boys’ club or good Ol’Boys club? Corruption and the parliamentary representation of young and old men and women. Parliamentary Affairs, 74(2), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaa004
39.
SueD. W.SpaniermanL. (2020). Microaggressions in everyday life. John Wiley and Sons.
40.
SwansonR. A. (2001). Human resource development and its underlying theory. Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860110059311
41.
ValdesF. (1996). Unpacking hetero-patriarchy: tracing the conflation of sex, gender and (and) sexual orientation to its origins. Yale JL and Human, 8, 161–211.
42.
WaselewskiA.WaselewskiM.WaselewskiE.KrugerL.ChangT. (2023). Perspectives of US youths on participation of transgender individuals in competitive sports: A qualitative study. JAMA Network Open, 6(2), e2255107–e2255107. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55107
43.
WernerJ. M.DeSimoneR. L. R. L. (2011). Human resource development. Cengage Learning.
