The attachment of a person’s “self” to “role” has been studied from a variety of perspectives by numerous social scientists since 1990. However, scholars are divided on the issues of definition and measurement of engagement. Also, the incremental validity of one engagement measure over the other in predicting performance has not been examined. Therefore, this study attempts to review, test, and examine the incremental validity of different operational definitions of engagement in light of the self and role theory.
The Solution
ANOVA conducted using 317 knowledge workers from different companies in India indicates that personal engagement, work engagement, and job engagement differ significantly from each other. Next, the results of step-wise regression indicate incremental validity of work engagement over other types of engagements in predicting task performance. However, personal engagement remains the strongest predictor of task performance.
The Stakeholders
The results of this study are expected to help human resource development (HRD) scholars make more informed decision while choosing a particular engagement measure. The results also encourage practitioners to use work engagement scale to explain their employees’ performance, at least in the Indian context.
AgarwalU. A. (2014). Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement. Personnel Review, 43, 41-73.
2.
AshforthB. E.HumphreyR. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations, 48, 97-125.
3.
BakkerA. B.AlbrechtS. L.LeiterM. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 4-28.
4.
BakkerA. B.HakanenJ. J.DemeroutiE.XanthopoulouD. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 274-284.
5.
BhatnagarJ. (2007). Talent management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: Key to retention. Employee Relations, 29, 640-663.
6.
BlockJ. H.BlockJ.MorrisonA. (1981). Parental agreement–disagreement on child-rearing orientations and gender-related personality correlates in children. Child Development, 52, 965-974.
7.
BormanW. C.MotowidloS. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
8.
BormanW. C.MotowidloS. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In SchmittN.BormanW. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
BurkeR. J.CooperC. L. (Eds.). (2008). The long work hours culture: Causes, consequences and choices. Bigley, UK: Emerald.
10.
CampbellJ. P.McCloyR. A.OpplerS. H.SagerC. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In SchmittN.BormanW. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
ChristianM.GarzaA.SlaughterJ. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89-136. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
12.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R.ArenbergD. (1980). Enduring dispositions in adult males. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 793-800. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.5.793
13.
FrankF. D.FinneganR. P.TaylorC. R. (2004). The race for talent: Retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century. People and Strategy, 27(3), 12-25.
14.
GuptaM. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, employee–company identification, and organizational commitment: Mediation by employee engagement. Current Psychology, 36, 101-109. doi:10.1007/s12144-015-9389-8
15.
GuptaM.AcharyaA.GuptaR. (2015). Impact of work engagement on performance in Indian higher education system. Review of European Studies, 7, 192-201.
16.
GuptaM.GanguliS.PonnamA. (2015). Factors affecting employee engagement in India: a study on offshoring of financial services. The Qualitative Report, 20, 498-515.
17.
GuptaM.KumarY. (2015). Justice and employee engagement: Examining the mediating role of trust in Indian B–schools. Asia–Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 7, 89-103.
18.
GuptaM.PandeyJ. (2016). Impact of student engagement on affective learning: Evidence from a large Indian university. Current Psychology, 1-8. doi: 10.1007/s12144-016-9522-3
19.
GuptaM.SayeedO. (2016). Social responsibility and commitment in management institutes: Mediation by engagement. Verslas: Teorija Ir Praktika, 17, 280-287.
20.
GuptaM.ShaheenM. (2017a). Impact of work engagement on turnover intention: Moderation by psychological capital in India. Business: Theory and Practice, 18, 136-143.
21.
GuptaM.ShaheenM. (2017b). The relationship between psychological capital and turnover intention: Work engagement as mediator and work experience as moderator. Jurnal Pengurusan (UKM Journal of Management), 49, 1-14.
22.
GuptaM.ShaheenM.ReddyP. K. (2017). Impact of psychological capital on organizational citizenship behavior: Mediation by work engagement. Journal of Management Development, 36(7), 1-25.
23.
HalbeslebenJ. R.BowlerW. M. (2007). Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 93-106.
24.
IlgenD. R.HollenbeckJ. R. (1991). The structure of work: Job design and roles. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 165-207.
25.
KahnW. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724. doi:10.2307/256287
LlorensS.SchaufeliW.BakkerA.SalanovaM. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist?Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 825-841.
28.
MaceyW. H.SchneiderB. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
29.
Masa’dehR. E.ObeidatB. Y.TarhiniA. (2016). A Jordanian empirical study of the associations among transformational leadership, transactional leadership, knowledge sharing, job performance, and firm performance: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Management Development, 35, 681-705.
30.
MayD. R.GilsonR. L.HarterL. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37. doi:10.1348/096317904322915892
PandeyJ.GuptaM.NaqviF. (2016). Developing decision making measure: A mixed method approach to operationalize Sankhya philosophy. European Journal of Science and Theology, 12, 177-189.
33.
ReioT. G.Jr.Sanders-ReioJ. (2011). Thinking about workplace engagement: does supervisor and coworker incivility really matter?Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13, 462-478.
34.
RichB. L.LepineJ.CrawfordE. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617-635. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468988
35.
SaksA. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600-619. doi:10.1108/02683940610690169
36.
SaksA. M. (2008). The meaning and bleeding of employee engagement: How muddy is the water?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 40-43.
37.
SalanovaM.BakkerA. B.LlorensS. (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 1-22.
38.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.González-RomáV.BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
39.
SchilitB.AdamsN.WantR. (1994). Context-aware computing applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications 1994, WMSA 1994. (pp. 85-90). New York; Santa Cruz, CA: IEEE Press.
40.
ShaheenM.GuptaM.SayeedO. B.AlokS. (2014). Behavioral intentions of academicians towards teaching and research: A study in the Indian B-school context. IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 8(3), 7-31.
41.
ShuckB.ReioT. G.Jr. (2011). The employee engagement landscape and HRD: How do we link theory and scholarship to current practice?Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13, 419-428.
42.
TimsM.BakkerA. B.DerksD. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 173-186. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009
WilliamsL. J.AndersonS. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
45.
WollardK. K.ShuckB. (2011). Antecedents to employee engagement a structured review of the literature. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13, 429-446.
