The U.S. health care system is currently undergoing reform, shifting from a volume to a value-based model. This transformation calls for strong leadership among physicians; however, they are often not prepared for leading changes for multiple reasons. Furthermore, physicians can be a challenging group to train when it comes to nonmedical disciplines. Therefore, identifying what will engage physicians in learning nonclinical topics is crucial for effective leadership development.
The Solution
I attempt to discuss this aspect by utilizing a year-long leadership development program, which yielded great response from physicians in terms of perceived value of learning. Exploring a more recent learning theory (connectivism) that considers the role of building personal learning networks (PLNs), I describe how the program unfolded and how the slow but steady emergence of PLNs became the basis for the learning. I also illustrate how theory has been used to guide program development, leading to successful outcomes.
The Stakeholders
Scholar-practitioners within human resource development (HRD), and leadership development professionals can be inspired to apply connectivism as a lens to further understand adult learning theories in the era of information and technology as well as apply to the development of leadership programs aimed at highly skilled professional groups.
AngoodP.BirkS. (2014). The value of physician leadership. Physician Executive, 40(3), 6-22.
2.
ArdichviliA.OhJ. R. (2013). The second academy-practice gap: Comparing areas of focus of HRD practitioner publications and academic programs. The Journal of Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Management, 8, 1-11.
3.
BackstromT. (2004). Collective learning: A way over the ridge to a new organizational attractor. The Learning Organization, 11, 466-477. doi:10.1108/09696470410548827
4.
BanduraA. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research, 213, 262.
5.
BellF. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 98-118. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/902
6.
BlumenthalD.AbramsM.NuzumR. (2015). The Affordable Care Act at 5 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 2451-2458. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr1503614
7.
BoitshwareloB. (2011). Proposing an integrated research framework for connectivism: Utilising theoretical synergies. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12, 161-179.
DigentiD. (1991). Collaborative learning: A core capability for organizations in the new economy. Reflections: The Sol Journal, 1(2), 45-57.
12.
DirkxJ. M. (2001). The power of feelings: Emotion, imagination, and the construction of meaning in adult learning. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 89, 63-72. doi:10.1002/ace.9
13.
DunawayM. K. (2011). Connectivism: Learning theory and pedagogical practice for networked information landscapes. Reference Services Review, 39, 675-685. doi:10.1108/00907321111186686
14.
Easterby-SmithM.AraujoL. (1999). Current debates and opportunities. In Easterby-SmithM.AraujoL.BurgoyneJ. (Eds.), Organizational learning and the learning organization (pp. 1-22). London, England: SAGE.
GaravanT.CarberyR. (2012). Collective learning. In SeelN. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning SE—136 (pp. 646-649). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_136
17.
GergenK. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
GundermanR. B. (2009). Leadership in healthcare. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
HodkinsonP.HodkinsonH. (2001, December5-7). The strengths and limitations of case study research. Paper presented at the Learning and Skills Development Agency conference: Making an Impact on Policy and Practice, Cambridge, UK.
21.
HuittW. (2013, December). Summary of theories relating to learning and development (Educational Psychology Interactive). Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/summary/lrndev.html
22.
KirkpatrickD. L. (1976). Evaluation of training. In CraigR. L. (Ed.), Training and development handbook: A guide to human resource development (2nd ed., pp. 301-319). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23.
KnowlesM. S.HoltonE. F.SwansonR. A. (2011). The adult learner. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
KopR. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Special Issue—Connectivism: Design and Delivery of Social Networked Learning, 12(3), 1-11. Retrieved from http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?action=rtdoc&an=18150443&lang=en
25.
KopR.HillA. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past?The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl
26.
Nussbaum-BeachS. (2013). Just the facts: Personal learning networks. Educational Horizons, 91(2), 26-27.
PorterM. E.TeisbergE. O. (2007). How physicians can change the future of health care. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 297, 1103-1111.
29.
PrahaladC. K.HamelG. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
30.
RohsF. R. (1999). Response shift bias: A problem in evaluating leadership development with self-report pretest–posttest measures. Journal of Agricultural Education, 40, 28-37.
31.
Scully-RussE.LehnerR.ShuckB. (2013). A scholar-practitioner case approach: Implications for advancing theory and research through informed practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15, 243-251. doi:10.1177/1523422313487307
32.
ShedroffN. (2009). Experience design 1.1: A manifesto for the design of experiences (Experience Design Books). Retrieved from www.experiencedesignbooks.com
33.
ShortD. C.KeeferJ.StoneS. J. (2009). The link between research and practice: Experiences of HRD and other professions. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 420-437. doi:10.1177/1523422309343278
34.
ShortD. C.ShindellT. J. (2009). Defining HRD scholar-practitioners. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 472-485. doi:10.1177/1523422309342225
35.
ShriramR.WarnerS. (2010). Connectivism and the impact of web 2.0 technologies on education. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 4-17.
36.
SiemensG. (2005, January). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
SlotnickH. B. (1999). How doctors learn: Physicians self-directed learning episodes. Academic Medicine, 10, 1106-1117.
39.
StarrP. (2008). The social transformation of American medicine: The rise of a sovereign profession and the making of a vast industry. New York, NY: Basic books.
40.
StollerJ. K. (2009). Developing physician-leaders: A call to action. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24, 876-878.
41.
Storberg-WalkerJ.Natt och DagK. E. (2017). Creativity in theorizing for women and leadership: A multi-paradigm perspective. In MadsenS. (Ed.), Handbook of research on gender and leadership queries. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
42.
SwansonR. A.HoltonE. F.III. (2009). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
43.
TschofenC.MacknessJ. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 124-143. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ979651
