This article considers concepts of toxic and bad leadership from a critical, post-structuralist perspective and illustrates how this can be conveyed to management students through the use of film analysis. In response to the paucity of critical approaches within toxic and bad leadership studies, we suggest that film is a useful way of developing in-depth discussion in student and management groups to uncover underlying subtleties and complexity in leadership theory and practice.
The Solution
We connect to film clips from Batman: The Dark Knight, and explain how this film is used with students and managers to illustrate the ambiguous nature of “good” and “bad” leadership and explore the fluid, shifting, and relational nature of these two concepts. We conclude that students and managers can recognize this more readily through viewing, discussing, and analyzing film clips such as the ones discussed herein.
The Stakeholders
University lecturers and students, executive educators and managers, general human resource development (HRD) professionals
BillsberryJ.EdwardsG. P. (2008). Toxic celluloid: Representations of bad leadership on film and implications for leadership development. Organizations and People, 15(3), 104-110.
2.
BuchananD.HuczynskiA. (2004). Images of influence: 12 angry men and thirteen days. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13, 312-323.
CollinsonD. L. (2011). Critical leadership studies. In BrymanA.CollinsonD.GrintK.JacksonB.Uhl-BienM. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 181-194). London, England: SAGE.
5.
CollinsonD. L. (2012). Prozac leadership and the limits of positive thinking. Leadership, 8, 87-107.
6.
ComerD. R. (2000). Not just a Mickey Mouse exercise: Using Disney’s The Lion King to teach leadership. Journal of Management Education, 25, 430-436.
7.
CunliffeA. L. (2009). The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity—A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management Learning, 40, 87-101.
8.
CunliffeA. L.EriksenM. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64, 1425-1449.
9.
FairhurstG. T. (2009). Considering context in discursive leadership research. Human Relations, 62, 1607-1633.
10.
FordJ. (2010). Studying leadership critically: A psychosocial lens on leadership identities. Leadership, 6, 47-66.
11.
FordJ.HardingN. (2007). Move over management: We are all leaders now. Management Learning, 38, 475-493.
12.
ForemanJ.ThatchenkeryT. J. (1996). Filmic representations for organizational analysis: The characterization of a transplant organization in the film Rising Sun. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9, 44-61.
13.
FryL.KrigerM. (2009). Towards a theory of being-centered leadership: Multiple levels of being as context for effective leadership. Human Relations, 62, 1667-1696.
14.
GardnerJ. (1978). On moral fiction. New York, NY: Basic Books.
15.
GergenK. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
HansenH.BathhurstR. (2011). Aesthetics and leadership. In BrymanA.CollinsonD.GrintK.JacksonB.Uhl-BienM. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 255-266). London, England: SAGE.
HarringtonK. V.GriffinR. W. (1990). Ripley, Burke, Gorman and friends: Using the film Aliens to teach leadership and power. Journal of Management Education, 14(3), 79-86.
19.
HowellsW. D. (1891). Criticism and fiction. New York, NY: Harper and Brother.
20.
IslamG. (2009). Animating leadership: Crisis and renewal of governance in four mythic narratives. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 828-836.
21.
KellermanB. (2004). Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
22.
KnightsD.O’LearyM. (2006). Leadership, ethics and responsibility to the other. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 125-137.
23.
KomakiJ. K. (1998). Leadership from an operant perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
LadkinD.TaylorS. (2010). Enacting the “true self”: Towards a theory of embodied authentic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 64-74.
25.
LidenR. C.AntonakisJ. (2009). Considering context in psychological leadership research. Human Relations, 62, 1587-1604.
26.
Lipman-BlumenJ. (2005). The allure of toxic leaders. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
NolanC.(Director). (2008). Batman: The Dark Knight [Motion picture]. Burbank, CA: Warner Bros.
PorterL. W.McLaughlinG. B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather?Leadership Quarterly, 17, 559-576.
30.
RopoA.ParviainenJ.KoivunenN. (2002). Aesthetics in leadership. From absent bodies to social bodily presence. In ParryK. W.MeindlJ. R. (Eds.), Grounding leadership theory and research: Issues and perspectives (pp. 21-38). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
31.
SalovaaraP. (2014). Video: Leadership in spaces and places. Organizational Aesthetics, 3(1), 79.
32.
SinclairA. (2007). Teaching leadership critically to MBAs: Experiences from heaven and hell. Management Learning, 38, 458-471.
33.
TylerC. L.AndersonM. H.TylerJ. M. (2009). Giving students new eyes: The benefits of having students find media clips to illustrate management concepts. Journal of Management Education, 33, 444-461.
34.
Uhl-BienM. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organising. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654-676.
35.
WarnerN. (2007). Screening leadership through Shakespeare: Paradoxes of leader-follower relations in Henry V on film. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 1-15.
36.
WeberM. (1952). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York, NY: Scribner.
37.
WeberM. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. New York, NY: Bedminster.
38.
WeickK. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London, England: SAGE.
39.
WoodM. (2005). The fallacy of misplaced leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1101-1121.
40.
WoodM.LadkinD. (2008). The event’s the thing: Brief encounters with the leaderful moment. In Turnbull-JamesK.CollinsJ. (Eds.), Leadership perspectives (pp. 15-28). London, England: Palgrave.
41.
ZollerH. M.FairhurstG. T. (2007). Resistance as leadership: A critical, discursive perspective. Human Relations, 60, 1331-1360.
