Individuals, organizations, and government are the primary forces studied in a work–life scenario. Too often these forces are studied independently of one another when they should instead be examined as a system. The most frequently discussed piece of the work–life system is work–life balance. Understanding how concepts of work–life balance are intertwined with meaningful work is important to individual and organizational development in human resource development (HRD).
The Solution
This article introduces the work–life system as a means to examine the three forces, individuals, organizations, and government, and the three work–life dimensions, balance, initiatives, and policy. The first force and the first dimension, individuals and work–life balance, are discussed to demonstrate connections between work–life balance, meaningful work, and organizational culture. Using data from the 2008 National Study of the Changing Workforce, a preliminary ordinary least squares regression analysis illustrates these relationships and provides insight for future research.
The Stakeholders
Work–life balance is increasingly relevant to HRD researchers and practitioners. This discussion seeks to illuminate key facets of the work–life dialogue and their impact on meaningful work to encourage further integration of the work–life system within HRD research and practice in the United States.
AycanZ.EskinM. (2005). Relative contributions of childcare, spousal support, and organizational support in reducing work–family conflict for men and women: The case of Turkey. Sex Roles, 53, 453-471.
2.
BailynL.DragoR.KochanT. A. (2001). Integrating work and family life: A holistic approach. Cambridge, MA: Sloan Work-Family Policy Network, MIT Sloan School of Management.
3.
BarnettR. C. (1999). A new work-life model for the twenty-first century. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 562, 143-158.
4.
BondS. (2004). Organisational culture and work-life conflict in the UK. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 24(12), 1-24.
5.
ChalofskyN. E. (2010). Meaningful workplaces: Reframing how and where we work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
ChalofskyN.KrishnaV. (2009). Meaningfulness, commitment, and engagement: The intersection of a deeper level of intrinsic motivation. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 189-203.
7.
ClarkS. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53, 747-770.
8.
CrookerK. J.SmithF. L.TabakF. (2002). Creating work-life balance: A model of pluralism across life domains. Human Resource Development Review, 1, 387-419.
9.
DeBordK.Fanning CanuR.KerpelmanJ. (2000). Understanding a work-family fit for single parents moving from welfare to work. Social Work, 45, 313-324.
10.
DelaneyJ. T.HuselidM. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949-969.
11.
Families and Work Institute. (2010). National study of the changing workforce: Guide to public use files. New York, NY: Author.
12.
FornesS.RoccoT. S.WollardK. K. (2008). Workplace commitment: A conceptual model developed from integrative review of the research connections. Human Resource Development Review, 7, 339-357.
13.
FriskoppA.SilversteinS. (1995). Straight jobs, gay lives: Gay and lesbian professionals, the Harvard Business School and the American workplace. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
14.
GalinskyE. (2009). Work-life policies: A “both/and” approach. In CrouterA.BoothA. (Eds.), Work-life policies (pp. 289-308). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
15.
GalinskyE.JohnsonA. A. (1998). Reframing the business case for work-life initiatives. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute.
16.
GalinskyE.SteinP. J. (1990). The impact of human resource policies on employees: Balancing work/family life. Journal of Family Issues, 11(4), 368-383.
17.
GlassJ. (2009). Work-life policies: Future directions for research. In CrouterA. C.BoothA. (Eds.), Work-life policies (pp. 231-250). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
18.
GreenhausJ. H.CollinsK. M.ShawJ. D. (2003). The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 510-531.
19.
GrzywaczJ. G.CarlsonD. S. (2007). Conceptualizing work-family balance: Implications for practice and research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9, 455-471.
20.
GuestD. E. (2002). Perspectives on the study of work-life balance. Social Science Information, 41, 255-279.
21.
HamiltonE. A.GordonJ. R.Whelan-BerryK. S. (2006). Understanding the work-life conflict of never-married women without children. Women in Management Review, 21, 393-415.
22.
HillE. J.HawkinsA. J.FerrisM.WeitzmanM. (2001). Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations, 50, 49-58.
23.
HochschildA. R. (1989). The second shift. New York, NY: Avon Books.
24.
HoffmanM. F.CowanR. L. (2008). The meaning of work/life: A corporate ideology of work/life balance. Communication Quarterly, 56, 227-246.
25.
HornsbyE. E.MunnS. L. (2009). University work-life benefits and same-sex couples. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 67-81.
26.
HuangY. H.HammerL. B.NealM. B.PerrinN. A. (2004). The relationship between work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict: A longitudinal study. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25, 79-100.
27.
KahnweilerW. M. (2008). The work-life conundrum: Will HRD become more involved? [Forum]. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19, 75-83.
28.
KanterR. M. (1977). Work and family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and policy. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
KirbyE.KroneK. (2002). “The policy exists but you can’t really use it”: Communication and the structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50-77.
30.
KonradA. M.MangelR. (2000). The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1225-1237.
31.
KossekE. E.DistelbergB. (2009). Work and family employment policy for a transformed labor force. In CrouterA.BoothA. (Eds.), Work-life policies (pp. 3-49). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
32.
KossekE. E.LewisS.HammerL. B. (2010). Work—life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream. Human Relations, 63, 3-19.
33.
LambertS. J. (2009). Making a difference for hourly employees. In CrouterA. C.BoothA. (Eds.), Work-life policies (pp. 169-195). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
34.
LambertS. J.WaxmanE. (2005). Organizational stratification: Distributing opportunities for work-life balance. In LambertS. J.WaxmanE. (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 103-126). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
LewisS. (2001). Restructuring workplace cultures: The ultimate work-family challenge?Women in Management Review, 16, 21-29.
36.
LobelS. A. (1999). Impacts of diversity and work-life initiatives in organizations. In PowellG. N. (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 453-476). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
McMillanH. S.MorrisM. L.AtchleyE. K. (2011). Constructs of the work/life interface: A synthesis of the literature and introduction of the concept of work/life harmony. Human Resource Development Review, 10, 6-25.
38.
MilkmanR. (2009). Flexibility for whom? Inequality in work-life policies and practices. In CrouterA.BoothA. (Eds.), Work-life policies (pp. 197-206). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
39.
MoenP.YuY. (2000). Effective work/life strategies: Working couples, work conditions, gender, and life quality. Social Problems, 47, 291-326.
40.
MorrisM. L. (2008). Combating workplace stressors: Using work-life initiatives as an OD intervention. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19, 95-105.
41.
MunnS. L. (2009). [Review of Work-life policies, edited by Ann C. Crouter and Allen Booth and Working after welfare: How women balance jobs and family in the wake of welfare reform, by Kristen Seefeldt]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 760-763.
42.
MunnS. L.RoccoT. S.BowmanL.van LooJ. B. (2011, July11-13). Work-life research and the representation of sexual minorities. Paper presented at the 7th International Critical Conference, Naples, Italy.
43.
OgbonnaE.HarrisL. C. (2002). Managing organisational culture: Insights from the hospitality industry. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(1), 33-53.
44.
Perry-JenkinsM.RepettiR. L.CrouterA. C. (2000). Work and family in the 1990’s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 981-998.
45.
Perry-SmithJ. E.BlumT. C. (2000). Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1107-1117.
46.
Pitt-CatsouphesM.Matz-CostaC.MacDermidS. M. (2007). HRD responses to work—family stressors. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9, 527-543.
47.
PowellB.BolzendahlC.GeistC.SteelmanL. C. (2012). Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of family. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
48.
RoyK. M. (2005). Transitions on the margins of work and family life for low-income African-American fathers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26, 77-100.
49.
SeefeldtK. S. (2008).Working after welfare: How women balance jobs and family in the wake of welfare reform. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
ThompsonC. A.BeauvaisL. L.LynessK. S. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392-415.
52.
TrauR. N. C.HartelC. E. J. (2007). Contextual factors affecting quality of work life and career attitudes of gay men. Employee Response Rights Journal, 19, 207-219.
53.
U.S. Department of Labor & U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Women in the labor force: A databook (1018). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor
54.
VoydanoffP. (2001). Incorporating community into work and family research: A review of basic relationships. Human Relations, 54(12), 1609-1637.
55.
VoydanoffP. (2005). Toward a conceptualization of perceived work-family fit and balance: A demands and resources approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 822-836.
56.
WilliamsJ. C. (2010). Reshaping the work-family debate: Why men and class matter. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
YasbekP. (2004). The business case for firm-level work-life balance policies: A review of the literature. Wellington, New Zealand: Labour Market Policy Group, Department of Labour.
