Scholar-practitioners can be more successful than their less grounded peers; yet engaging in scholarly practice is not a guarantee of success in a business environment. The cases in this issue provide examples of scholarly practice, but don’t necessarily provide actionable advice on how it is effectively accomplished.
The Solution
This article derives a framework for SMART (Scholarly, Macro, Aligned, Realistic, and Tested) practice that draws from the literature on scholarly practice and the literature on practicing HRD with a business mind-set to generate practices that are effective in organizations. The cases in this issue provide examples of these behaviors.
The Stakeholders
The SMART framework supports practitioners who want to increase their effectiveness at integrating theory and research into practice and HRD faculty who want to provide guidance on successful scholarly practice. In the end, leaders that might desire a more theory- or evidenced-based approach to HRD will benefit from having more savvy HRD practitioners.
BeckerB. E.HuselidM. A.UlrichD. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy and performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
2.
Bersin & Associates. (2008). The high impact learning organization. Oakland, CA: Bersin & Associates.
3.
BieremaL. L. (2009). Critiquing human resource development’s dominant masculine rationality and evaluating its impact. Human Resource Development Review, 8(1), 68-96.
4.
BurkeL.HutchinsH. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 6, 263-296.
5.
BuschT. K. (2013). Determining competencies for frontline sales managers in for-profit organizations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14(3), 296–313.
6.
ClarkR. E. (2005). How to turn research into successful practice: A technology of performance design for organizations, teams, and individuals. Paper presented at the ASTD Research-to-Practice Conference, Orlando, FL.
7.
CLC Learning and Development. (2003). Engaging managers as agents of employee development. Washington, DC: Corporate Executive Board.
8.
DervenM. (2012). Building a strategic approach to learning evaluation. T + D, 66(11), 54-57.
9.
GaravanT. N. (2007). A strategic perspective on human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(1), 11-30.
10.
GedroJ.WangJ. (2013). Creating civil and respectful organizations through the scholar-practitioner bridge. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14(3), 284–295.
11.
GottfredsonC.MosherB. (2011). Innovative performance support: Strategies and practices for learning in the workflow. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
12.
GrovesA.RickelmanC.CassarinoC.HallM. J. (2012). Are you ready for agile learning design?T + D, 66(3), 46-51.
13.
HagelJ.Seely BrownJ.DavisonL. (2010). The power of pull. New York, NY: Basic Books.
14.
HamlinR. G. (2007). An evidence-based perspective on HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(1), 42-57.
15.
HammondsK. H. (2005). Why we hate HR. Fast Company, 97, 40-47.
16.
HeathC.HeathD. (2010). Switch: How to change things when change is hard. New York, NY: Crown Business.
17.
HoltonE. (2004). Implementing evidence-based practices: Time for a national movement?Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 187-188.
18.
HoltonE.BatesR.BookterA.YamkovenkoV. B. (2007). Convergent and divergent validity of the learning transfer system inventory. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18, 385-419.
19.
HuffA. S. (2008). Designing research for publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
JarvisP. (1999). Action researchThe practitioner-researcher: Developing theory from practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
KirkpatrickJ. D.KirkpatrickW. K. (2011). Creating ROE: The end is the beginning. T + D, 65(11), 60-64.
22.
KormanikM.LehnerR.WinnickT. (2009). General competencies for the HRD scholar-practitioner: Perspectives from across the profession. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 486-506.
23.
LombardozziC. (2007). Avoiding malpractice in HRD . . . Five imperatives for HRD professionals in organizations. Human Resource Development Review, 6, 208-216.
LombardozziC.TylerJ. (2010). Being a workplace champion of research and theory: How to do it, and become better at it. Pre-Conference Workshop. AHRD International Research Conference. Knoxville, TN.
26.
LynhamS. A.McDonaldK. S. (2011). There's nothing quite as practical as good research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(2), 131-134. doi:10.1177/1523422311415640
27.
PattersonK.GrennyJ.MaxfieldD.McMillanR.SwitzlerA. (2008). Influencer: The power to change anything. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
28.
PfefferJ.SuttonR. I. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
29.
RobinsonD. G.RobinsonJ. C. (1995). Performance consulting: Moving beyond training. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
30.
RossettA. (2009). First things fast: A handbook for performance analysis. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
31.
RousseauD. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”?Academy of Management Review, 31, 256-269.
32.
RousseauD. M.McCarthyS. (2007). Educating managers from an evidence-based perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 84-101.
33.
RummlerG. A.BracheA. P. (1995). Improving performance: How to manage the white space on the organizational chart. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
34.
RuonaW.GilleyJ. (2009). Practitioners in applied professions: A model applied to human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 438-453.
35.
RynesS. L.BartunekJ. M.DaftR. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340-355.
36.
ShortD. C. (2006). The gap between research and practice in HRD: A summary of the discussion 1995-2005. Paper presented at the AHRD 2006 International Research Conference, Columbus, OH.
37.
ShortD.C. (2013) - Designing a 3-D virtual HRD environment from a scholar- practitioner perspective. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14(3), 270–283.
38.
ShortD. C.KeeferJ.StoneS. (2009). The link between research and practice: Experiences of HRD and other professions. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 420-437.
39.
ShortD. C.KeeferJ. M.StoneS. J. (2006). The link between research and practice: Experiences of different professions and implications for HRD. Paper presented at the AHRD 2006 International Research Conference, Columbus, OH.
40.
ShortD. C.ShindellT. (2009). Defining HRD scholar-practitioners. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 472-485
41.
TenkasiR. V.HayG. W. (2004). Actionable knowledge and scholar-practitioners: A process model of theory-practice linkages. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17, 177-206.
42.
ThomasD.BrownJ. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: Authors.
43.
ThomasM. N. (2006). Evidence-practice partnership. Performance Improvement, 45(6), 8-12.
44.
TylerJ. (2006). Re-searching research models: What is emergent, elastic, and nonlinear all over?Human Resource Development Review, 5, 494-505.
45.
TylerJ. (2009). Moving beyond scholar-practitioner binaries: Exploring the liminal possibilities of the borderlands. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 523-535.
46.
Van de VenA. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
Van TiemD.MoseleyJ.DessingerJ. C. (2004). Fundamentals of performance technology: A guide to improving people, process, and performance. Silver Spring, MD: International Society for Performance Improvement.
48.
WassermanI. C.KramK. E. (2009). Enacting the scholar-practitioner role: An exploration of narratives. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(1), 12-38.
49.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
50.
WengerE.SnyderW. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139-145.
51.
WickC.PollockR.JeffersonA. (2006). Six disciplines of breakthrough learning. San Franciso, CA: Pfieffer.
52.
WukitschM.SimmonsR.HuttM. (2013). Rearticulating shared values through applied theories at Children’s Hospital Colorado. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14(3), 252–269.
53.
ZemkeR.RossettA. (2002). A hard look at ISD. Training, 39(2), 26-34.
