Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Problem

This article explores some of the tensions that required careful management in the design and delivery of a leadership development program. This discussion draws particularly upon a formal evaluation of two cohorts, each comprising approximately 20 senior managers working in adult social care. Complexity theory, notably Complex Responsive Processes of Relating, is used to make visible, explore and articulate the need to hold in tension apparently contradictory forces and requirements. The program was established at a critical time in the U.K. government’s public services reform agenda, which was unfolding during a period of increasing resource constraint. This included a requirement upon commissioners to demonstrate impact and return on investment (ROI) in development programs. However, complexity theory explains why a direct causal relationship between inputs and outcomes is not amenable to demonstration by evaluation.

The Solution

Consequently, the approach to demonstrating ROI explored the microprocesses underpinning the development of the participants’ thinking and practice through formative real time and post hoc evaluation. This comprised a range of qualitative techniques: extended observations provided an “ethnographic” overview of the program; participant and stakeholder interviews gave insight into critical incidents and key learning points; and guided conversations placed greater emphasis on the everyday experience of participants in applying their learning. It is argued that such an approach to evaluation is both a research intervention and a contribution to the development process.

The Stakeholders

Our article will be of particular relevance to human resource professionals, leadership development practitioners, commissioners, business schools and evaluators facing the challenge of finding meaningful measures of “ROI” for individual and organizational development.

Keywords

complexity theory complex responsive processes of relating evaluation leadership development tensions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbotson

Lustig

(2005). Organizational constellations meets appreciative inquiry. In McKergow

Clarke

(Eds.), Positive approaches to change (pp. 93-107). Cheltenham, UK: Solutions Books.

Antonacopoulou

E. P.

(2010). Making the business school more “critical”: Reflexive critique based on phronesis as a foundation for impact. British Journal of Management, 21(SI), S6-S25.

Bakhtin

M. M.

(1986). Speech genres and other late essays ( Emerson

Holquist

, Eds., McGee

V. W.

, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Beer

(1967). Cybernetics and management. London, UK: English Universities Press.

Benington

Hartley

(2009). Whole systems go! Improving leadership across the whole public service system. London, UK: National School of Government, Sunningdale Institute.

Bertallanfy

L. von

. (1968). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller.

Billy

Jowitt

(2012). Stepping into the unknown: Dialogical experiential learning. Journal of Management Development, 31, 221-230.

Blackler

Kennedy

(2004). The design and evaluation of a leadership program for experienced chief executives from the public sector. Management Learning, 35, 181-203.

Boje

D. M.

(2008). Storytelling organizations. London, UK: Sage.

10.

Bolden

(Ed.). (2005). What is leadership development? Purpose and practice (Leadership South West Research Report 2). Exeter, UK: University of Exeter Centre for Leadership Studies.

11.

Burns

(2007). Systemic action research: A strategy for whole system change. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

12.

Burns

(2009). How can complexity theory contribute to more effective development and aid evaluation? (Dialogue at the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund, UK.). London, UK: © Panos London. Retrieved from http://panos.org.uk/wpcontent/files/2011/03/Panos_London_Complexity_and_Evaluation_dialogueCK5gVc.lpdf

13.

Chapman

(2004). System failure: Why governments must learn to think differently (2nd ed). London, UK: Demos.

14.

Chia

(2005). The aim of management education: Reflections on Mintzberg’s managers not MBAs. Organization Studies, 26, 1090-1092.

15.

Cunliffe

(2009). The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity—A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management Learning, 40(1), 87-101.

16.

Cunliffe

A. L.

Eriksen

(2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64, 1425-1449.

17.

Fonseca

(2002). Complexity and innovation in organizations. London, UK: Routledge.

18.

Foucault

(1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison ( Sheridon

, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin.

19.

French

(2001). Negative capability: Managing the confusing uncertainties of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 14, 480-492.

20.

Friere

(1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed ( Bergman Ramos

, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin.

21.

Gleeson

Knights

(2006). Challenging dualism: Public professionalism in troubled times. Sociology, 40, 277-295.

22.

Hannum

K. M.

Martineau

J. W.

Reinelt

(2007). The handbook of leadership development evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

23.

Harris

C. A.

Leberman

S. I.

(2012). Leadership development for women in New Zealand universities: Learning from the New Zealand women in leadership program. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14(1), 28-46.

24.

Hayward

Voller

(2010, Summer). How effective is leadership development? The evidence examined. 360 The Ashridge Journal, 8-13.

25.

Isaacs

(1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together. New York, NY: Doubleday.

26.

Jarvis

C. A.

(2004). Changing the deal: Implications for the informal contract and workplace relations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.

27.

Mayo

Hoggett

Miller

(2007). Navigating the contradictions of public service modernisation: The case of community engagement professionals. Policy and Politics, 35, 667-681.

28.

Miller

E. J.

Rice

A. K.

(1967). Systems of organization: The control of task and sentient boundaries. London, UK: Tavistock.

29.

Mitleton-Kelly

(2011). A complexity theory approach to sustainability: A longitudinal study in two London NHS hospitals. Learning Organization, 18(1), 45-53.

30.

Mowles

(2011). Rethinking management: Radical insights from the complexity sciences. London, UK: Gower.

31.

Norris

Kushner

(2007). The new public management & evaluation. In Kushner

Norris

(Eds.), Dilemmas of engagement: Evaluation in the new public management. San Diego, CA: Elseneir.

32.

Peters

Baum

(2007). The importance of local context in leadership development and evaluation. In Hannum

K. M.

Martineau

J. W.

Reinelt

(Eds.), The handbook of leadership development evaluation (pp. 261-283). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

33.

Ricouer

(1992). Oneself as another ( Blamey

, Trans.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

34.

Rowling

(Ed.). (2011). The future of leadership and management in the NHS: No more heroes (A report from “The King’s Fund”). London, UK: The King’s Fund.

35.

Senge

(1990). The fifth discipline. New York, NY: Doubleday.

36.

Senge

Scharmer

C. O.

Jaworski

Flowers

B. S.

(2005). Presence. London, UK: Nicholas Brearley.

37.

Shaw

(2002). Changing conversations in organizations: A complexity approach to change. London, UK: Routledge.

38.

Simpson

French

Harvey

(2002). Leadership and negative capability. Human Relations, 55, 1209-1226.

39.

Sorensen

P. F.

Yaeger

T. F.

Savall

Zardet

Bonnet

Peron

(2010). A review of two major global and international approaches to organizational change: SEAM and appreciative inquiry. Organization Development Journal, 28(4), 31-39.

40.

Stacey

R. D.

(2003). Strategic management & organizational dynamics: The challenge of complexity (4th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.

41.

Stacey

R. D.

(2010). Complexity and organizational reality: Uncertainty and the need to rethink management after the collapse of investment capitalism. London, UK: Routledge.

42.

Stacey

Griffin

Shaw

(2000). Complexity and management. Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? London, UK: Routledge.

43.

Sweeney

Griffiths

(Eds.). (2002). Complexity and healthcare: An introduction. Abingdon, UK: Radcliffe Medical Press.

44.

Symonette

(2007). Making evaluation work for the greater good: Supporting provocative possibility and responsive praxis in leadership development. In Hannum

K. M.

Martineau

J. W.

Reinelt

(Eds.), The handbook of leadership development evaluation (pp 111-136). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

45.

Thietart

R. A.

Forgues

(1995). Chaos theory and organization. Organization Science, 6(1), 19-31.

46.

Turnbull

Edwards

(2005). Leadership development for organizational change in a New U.K. University. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 396-413.

47.

Uhl-Bien

Marion

McKelvey

(2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298-318.

48.

Vince

(1998). Behind and beyond Kolb’s learning cycle. Journal of Management Education, 22, 304-319.

49.

Walshe

Harvey

Skelcher

Jas

(2009). Could do better? Knowledge, learning and performance improvement in public services. University of Birmingham and Manchester Business School. ESRC Public Service Program.

50.

Wheatley

(1999) Leadership and the new science (Rev. ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett and Koehler.

51.

Zeldin

(1995). An intimate history of humanity. London, UK: Minerva.

Leadership Matters

Abstract

The Problem

The Solution

The Stakeholders

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References