Group potency is one key determinant shown to positively influence the effectiveness and performance of groups and teams. This article presents research on potency of work groups in higher education and perceived organizational support as an antecedent. A total of 192 working professionals who were either holding or earning advanced degrees in human resource development, education, or consumer and family sciences completed questionnaires to determine the association of these two variables. The data were analyzed at the individual and group levels, and findings reveal there is a significant positive relationship between group potency and perceived organizational support.
Akgun, A., Keskin, H., Byrne, J., & Imamoglu, S. ( 2007). Antecedents and consequences of team potency in software development projects. Information & Management, 44(7), 646-656.
2.
Alderfer, C. ( 1977). Group and intergroup relations. In Improving the Quality of Work Life ed. JR Hackman, JL Suttle, 227-296, Pallisades, CA: Goodyear.
3.
Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lynch, P. ( 1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influences of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 288-297.
4.
Baldwin, T., Bedell, M., & Johnson, J. ( 1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369-1397.
5.
Bandura, A. ( 1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
6.
Bartel, C.A., & Saavedra, R. ( 2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 197-231.
7.
Becker, H.S. ( 1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32-42.
8.
Bedeian, A. ( 2007). "Even if the tower is ‘ivory’, it isn’t white": Understanding the consequences of faculty cynicism. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 9-32.
9.
Blau, P.M. ( 1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
10.
Byrne, Z., & Hochwarter, W. (2008). Perceived organizational support and performance: Relationships across levels of organizational cynicism . Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(1), 54-72.
11.
Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.A., & Higgs, A.C. ( 1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
12.
Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.A., Higgs, A.C., Russ-Eft, D.F., Preskill, H.S., & Sleezer, C. ( 1997). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. In D. F. Russ-Eft, H. S. Preskill & C. Sleezer (Eds.), Human resource development review: Research and implications (pp. 147-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
Campion, M.A., Papper, E.M., & Medsker, G.A. ( 1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429-452.
14.
Carnegie, D. (n.d.). HeartQuotes™: Quotes of the heart. Retrieved from http://www.heartquotes.net/teamwork-quotes.html
15.
Chaddock, K., & Saltiel, I. ( 2003, November). The communal side of learning: A meta-analysis for development of an integrative model. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Portland, OR.
16.
De Jong, A., De Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. ( 2005). Antecedents and consequences of group potency: A study of self-managing service teams. Management Science, 51(11), 1610-1625.
17.
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P., & Rhoades, L. ( 2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42-51.
18.
Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. ( 1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 812-830.
19.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59.
20.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. ( 1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
21.
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I., & Rhoades, L. ( 2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565-573.
22.
Feld, S.L. ( 1997). Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations. Social Networks, 19, 91-95.
23.
Gibson, C.B. ( 1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 138-152.
24.
Gil, F., Rico, R.N., Alcover, C.M., & Barrasa, Ã.N. (2005). Change-oriented leadership, satisfaction and performance in work groups: Effects of team climate and group potency. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(3/4), 312-328.
25.
Gouldner, A.W. ( 1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
26.
Graen, G.B., & Scandura, T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 175-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27.
Gully, S.M., Incalcaterra, K.A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J.M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.
28.
Guzzo, R., & Dickson, M. ( 1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.
29.
Guzzo, R., Yost, P., Campbell, R., & Shea, G. ( 1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
30.
Hackman, J.R. ( 1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
Hackman, J.R. ( 1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 199-267). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
32.
Hardin, A.M., Fuller, M.A., & Davison, R.M. ( 2007). I know I can, but can we? Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Research, 38, 130-155.
33.
Hardin, A.M., Fuller, M.A., & Valacich, J.S. (2006). Measuring group efficacy in virtual teams: New questions in an old debate. Small Group Research, 37, 65-84.
34.
Hecht, T.D., Allen, N.J., Klammer, J.D., & Kelly, E.C. ( 2002). Group beliefs, ability, and performance: The potency of group potency. Group Dynamic: Theory, Research, and Practice , 6, 143-152.
35.
Hirschfeld, R.R., Jordan, M.H., Feild, H.S., Giles, W.F., & Armenakis, A.A. (2005). Teams’ female representation and perceived potency as inputs to team outcomes in a predominantly male field setting. Personnel Psychology, 58, 893-924.
36.
Howell, J.M., & Shea, C.M. ( 2006). Effects of champion behavior, team potency, and external communication activities on predicting team performance. Group Organization Management, 31, 180-211.
37.
Jung, C.G. ( 1990). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (R. F. C. Hull, Trans., 2nd ed. Vol. 9). New York: Princeton University Press.
38.
Kirkman, B.L., & Rosen, B. ( 1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. The Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58-74.
39.
Lee, C., Tinsley, C., & Bobko, P. ( 2002). An investigation of the antecedents and consequences of group-level confidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 32, 1628-1652.
40.
Lesser, E.L., & Storck, J. ( 2001). Communities of practice and organizational performance . IBM Systems Journal, 40, 831-841.
41.
Lester, S.W., Meglino, B.M., & Korsgaard, M.A. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups . Academy of Management Journal, 45, 352-368.
42.
Levinson, S. ( 1965). The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 370-390.
43.
Liu, X., Magjuka, R.J., & Lee, S. ( 2008). An examination of the relationship among structure, trust, and conflict management styles in virtual teams. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21, 77-93.
44.
Lynch, P., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. ( 1999). Perceived organizational support: Inferior versus superior performance by wary employees. Journal of Applied Psychology , 84, 467-483.
45.
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. ( 2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476.
Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J. ( 1984). Testing the "side-bet theory" of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology , 69, 372-378.
48.
Quatro, S.A. ( 2009). Motivation. In A. Gilley , J. W. Gilley, S. Quatro, & P. Dixon (Eds.), The Praeger handbook of human resource management (Vol. 1, pp. 58-61). Westport, CT : Praeger.
49.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology , 87, 698-714.
50.
Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. ( 2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology , 86, 825-836.
51.
Rhoades, L., Shanock, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 689-695.
52.
Rousseau, D. ( 1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations . Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121-139.
53.
Sayles, L.R. ( 1958). The behaviour of industrial work groups. New York: Wiley.
54.
Shea, G., & Guzzo, R. ( 1987). Groups as human resources. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 5, 323-356.
55.
Shelton, P. ( 2008). Group potency in graduate learning communities: Organizational support, group size and duration of membership (Doctoral dissertation). Colorado State University.
56.
Shore, L.M., & Shore, T.H. ( 1995). Perceived organizational support and organizational justice . In R. Cropanzano & K. M. Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing social climate at work (pp. 149-164). Westport, CT: Quorum Press.
57.
Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W.D., Avolio, B.J., & Jung, D.I. ( 2002). A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group & Organization Management, 27, 66-97.
58.
Stajkovic, A.D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A.J. ( 2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 814-828.
59.
Teitel, L. ( 1997). Understanding and harnessing the power of the cohort model in preparing educational leaders. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(2), 66-85.
60.
Tesluk, P., & Mathieu, J. ( 1999). Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness . Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 200-217.
61.
Van den Bossche, P., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. ( 2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490-521.
62.
Wayne, S., Shore, L., & Liden, R. ( 1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal , 40, 82-111.
63.
Wenger, E. ( 2004). Knowledge management as a doughnut: Shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice. Ivey Business Journal , 68, 1-8.
64.
Wheelan, S.A. ( 1990). Facilitating training groups: A guide to leadership and verbal intervention skills. New York: Praeger.
