The problem and the solution . The article explores the contribution of communities of practice (COP) to human resource development (HRD), specifically exploring a main point of COP, that learning is about negotiating identities.This implies that individuals attach temporal significance to the activities in which they are engaged by means of a symbolic framework. Identity construction implies construction of a trajectory that connects past, present, and future. There are several implications for HRD research and practice. First, the authors argue that identity dissolves the artificial separation of individual-level HRD and organizational-level HRD because identity is viewed as a pivotal point between the personal and the societal. Second, working with learning and development is to work with individuals' construction of trajectories. The authors distinguish between two ways of exploring trajectories: reflective practice—exploring trajectories to create best practice but where prevalent discourses are fixed—and reflexive practice—exploring trajectories to question discourses from within.
Ainsworth, S., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and identities. In D. Grant, C. Hardy , C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 153-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Boje, D.M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational & communication research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
4.
Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (1996). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice- Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 58-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198-213.
6.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Chappell, C., Rhodes, C., Solomon, N., Tennant, M., & Yates, L. (2003). Reconstructing the lifelong learner-Pedagogy and identity in individual, organizational and social change. New York: Routledge.
8.
Clegg, S.R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London : Sage.
9.
Clegg, S.R., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations- Foundations for organization science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
10.
Cunliffe, A.L., & Jong, J.S. (2005). The need for reflexivity in public administration . Administration & Society, 37, 225-242.
11.
Cunliffe, A.L., Luhmann, J.T., & Boje, D.M. (2004). Narrative temporality: Implications for organizational research. Organization Studies, 25(2), 261-286.
12.
Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the organization-Dramas of institutional identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Czarniawska, B. (1999). Writing management-Organization theory as a literary genre. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. New York: Prometheus.
15.
Foucault, M. (1993). Excerpts from the history of sexuality: Volume 1: An introduction. In J. Natoli & L. Hutcheon (Eds.), A postmodern reader (pp. 333-341). New York: State University of New York Press.
16.
Garavan, T.N., McGuire, D., & O'Donnell, D. (2004). Exploring human resource development: A levels of analysis approach. Human Resource Development Review, 4(4), 417-441.
17.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description-Towards an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures-Selected essays (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
18.
Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000). To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 7(2), 329-348.
19.
Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2001). The sociological foundations of organizational learning. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child , & I. Nonaka (Eds.), The handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 35-60). Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
21.
Henriksen, L.B., Nørreklit, L., Jørgensen, K.M., Christensen, J.B., & O'Donnell, D. (2004). Dimensions of change-Conceptualising reality in organizational research. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
22.
Jørgensen, K.M. (2002). The meaning of local knowledges-Genealogy and organizational analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Management , 18(1), 29-46.
23.
Jørgensen, K.M. (2006). Conceptualising intellectual capital as language game and power. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(1), 78-92.
24.
Jørgensen, K.M. (2007). Power without glory-A genealogy of a management decision. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
25.
Kendall, G., & Wickham, G. (1999). Using Foucault's methods. London: Sage.
26.
Latour, B. (1996). Aramis-Or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning-Legitimate peripheral participation . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Linstead, A., & Thomas, R. (2002). What do you want from me? A poststructuralist feminist reading of middle managers' identities. Culture and Organization, 8(1), 1-20.
29.
McGuire, D., O'Donnell, D., Garavan, T.N., Saha, S.K., & Murphy, J. (2002). The cultural boundedness of theory and practice in HRD. Cross-Cultural Management: An International Journal , 9(2), 25-44.
30.
O'Donnell, D., Gubbins, C., McGuire, D., Jørgensen, K.M., Henriksen, L.B., & Garavan, T.N. (2007). Social capital and HRD: Provocative insights from critical management studies. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(3), 413-435.
31.
O'Donnell, D., McGuire, D., & Cross, C. (2006). Critically challenging some assumptions in HRD . International Journal of Training and Development, 10(1), 1-16.
32.
Pålshaugen, Ø. (1998). The end of organization theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33.
Pullen, A. (2005). Managing identity. Basingstoke , UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
35.
Rogers, C.R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
36.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London : Hutchinson of London.
37.
Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner-How professional think in action. New York: Basic Books .
38.
Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities-In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14-22.
39.
Weick, K.E., & Westley, F. (1996). Organizational learning: Affirming an oxymoron . In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 440-458). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice-Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Wittgenstein, L. (1983). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
