The problem and the solution. Perhaps some of the most revealing aspects about leadership can be evidenced through the examination of leaders facing extreme challenges. J. J. Abram's television program, Lost, provides a compelling backdrop for the study of leadership during such times of trial. Each week millions of viewers tune in to watch the struggles of the passengers of the doomed Oceanic Air Flight 815. Confronted with the constant struggle for survival in the context of bizarre occurrences, the passengers begin to demonstrate and reveal their leadership qualities and skills.This article analyzes five different leadership theories (trait, skills, path-goal, leader-member exchange, and team) using eight different characters from the television series to demonstrate leadership theory in practice. The article concludes with different teaching activities for facilitators to use when teaching various leadership theories and practices.
Abrams, J. J. (Producer). (2004). Lost [Television series]. New York: ABC.
2.
Ayman, R. (2004). Situational and contingency approaches to leadership . In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 148—170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Burns, J.Z., & Otte, F.L. (1999). Implications of leader member exchange theory and research for human resource development research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(3), 225—247.
4.
Elkins, T., & Keller, R.T. (2003). Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 587—606.
5.
Famous-Quotes-And-Quotations. (2006). Napoleon Bonaparte's quote. Retrieved November 24, 2006, from: http://www.famous-quotes-and-quotations.com/leadershipquotes.html .
6.
Graen, G.B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly , 6(2), 219—247.
7.
Hill, S.E.K. (2004). Team leadership. In P. G. Northouse (Ed.), Leadership theory and practice. (pp. 203—234). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
House, R.J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly,16, 321—338.
9.
House, R.J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lesson, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3) 323—353.
10.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
11.
Katz, R.L. (1955). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 33(1), 33— 42.
12.
Kleinfeld, J.S. (2002). The small world problem. Society , 39(2), 61—67.
13.
Lee, J. ( 1997). Leader member exchange: The “Pelz Effect” and cooperative communication between group members. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(2), 266—287.
14.
McGrath, J.E. (1962). Leadership behavior: Some requirements for leadership training. Washington, DC: U.S. Civil Service Commission.
15.
Northouse, P.G. (2004). Leadership theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Schriesheim, J.F., & Schriesheim, C.A. (1980). A test of the path-goal theory of leadership and some suggested directions for future leadership. Personnel Psychology33, 349—370.
