The problem and the solution. In this article, the author draws on a discourse perspective to explore the role of the human resource development (HRD) function in shaping organizational change within a large manufacturing firm moving toward a flatter team-based organizational structure. In support of an emerging “critical” strand of HRD, the author gives special consideration to how HRD specialists worked with colleagues from the personnel function to strategically draw on a complex mix of discursive constructions to promote a supportive learning environment and enhanced worker participation.Treating language as social practice, the author shows how this ability to act strategically was shaped by a variety of discursive practices at corporate level and beyond.
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: Challenges, responses, consequences. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 136-158.
2.
Bierema, L. L., & Cseh, M. (2003). Evaluating AHRD research using a feminist research framework. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14, 5-26.
3.
Caldwell, R. (2003). The changing roles of personnel managers: Old ambiguities, new uncertainties. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 903-1004.
4.
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2004). Professional standards. Retrieved November 10, 2004, from http://www.cipd.co.uk/mandq/standards/professionalstandardsfullversion.htm?IsSrchRes=1
5.
Eliott, C., & Turnbull, S. (2005). Critical thinking in human resource development: An introduction. In C. Eliott & S. Turnbull (Eds.), Critical thinking in human resource development (pp. 1-8). New York: Routledge.
6.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: Papers in the critical study of language. White Plains, NY: Longman.
7.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
8.
Fairclough, N. (2005). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121-138). London: Sage.
9.
Fenwick, T. (2003). Emancipatory potential of action research: A critical analysis. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16, 619-632.
10.
Fenwick, T. (2004). Towards a critical HRD in theory and practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 54, 193-209.
11.
Fenwick, T. (2005). Conceptions of critical HRD: Dilemmas for theory and practice. Human Resource Development International, 8, 225-238.
12.
Francis, H. (2003). HRM and the beginnings of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16, 309-328.
13.
Francis, H., & Keegan, A. (2006). The changing face of HR: In search of balance. Human Resource Management Journal, 16, 231-249.
14.
Francis, H., & Sinclair, J. (2003). A processual analysis of HRM-based change. Organization, 10, 685-706.
15.
Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., & Putnam, L. (2004). Introduction—Organizational discourse: Exploring the field. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 1-36). London: Sage.
16.
Hatcher, T. (2006). Democratizing the workplace through professionalization of human resource development. International Journal of Training and Development, 10, 67-82.
17.
Harley, B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Firing blanks? An analysis of discursive struggle in HRM. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 377-400.
18.
Keenoy, T. (1999). HRM as hologram: A polemic. Journal of Management Studies, 36, 1-23.
Kuchinke, K. P. (1998). Moving beyond the dualism of learning versus performance as root metaphors for HRD: A response to Barry and Pace. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9, 377-384.
21.
Landen, M. (2002). Emotion management: Dabbling in mystery—White witchcraft or black art?Human Resource Development International, 5, 507-521.
22.
Legge, K. (1995). Human resource management: Rhetorics and realities. New York: Macmillan.
23.
McGoldrick J., Stewart, J., & Watson, S. (2002). Researching HRD: Philosophy, process and practice. In J. McGoldrick, J. Stewart, & S. Watson (Eds.), Understanding human resource development: A research-based approach (pp. 1-17). London: Routledge.
24.
Mello, R. A. (2002). Collocation analysis: A method for conceptualizing and under-standing narrative data. Qualitative Research, 2, 231-234.
25.
Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. London: Sage.
26.
Mueller, F., & Carter, C. (2005). The “HRM project” and managerialism, or why some discourses are more equal than others. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18, 369-382.
27.
Mumby, D. K. (2004). Discourse, power and ideology: Unpacking the critical approach. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 237-258). London: Sage.
28.
Rosenthal, P., Hill, S., & Peccei, R. (1998). Checking out service: Evaluating excellence, HRM and TQM in retailing. In C. Mabey, G. Salaman, & J. Storey (Eds.), Strategic human resource management: A reader (pp. 170-181). London: Sage.
29.
Sambrook, S. (2004). A “critical” time for HRD?Journal of European Industrial Training, 28, 611-624.
30.
Trehan, K. (2004). Who is not sleeping with whom? What's not being talked about HRD?Journal of European Industrial Training, 28, 23-38.
31.
Tsoukas, H. (2005). Afterward: Why language matters in the analysis of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18, 96-104.
32.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
33.
Watson, T. J. (1994). In search of management. London: Routledge.
34.
Watson T. J. (2002). Organising and managing work. Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
35.
Watson, T. J. (2004). HRM and critical social science analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 447-467.
