The problem and solution. The analysis phase of analysis, design, develop, implement, evaluate (ADDIE) was originally based on the understanding that training was needed and that analyzing the content was the starting point. Over time the analysis phase has become the defining phase as it moved up from job-task analysis for identifying the content of a training program to (a) analyzing a worker performance problem that can be addressed by training, (b) to identifying and analyzing a worker-work system performance problem that can be addressed by a combination management and training intervention, and (c) on to an analysis process for diagnosing performance in an organization that may or may not involve training as part of a performance improvement intervention. The contemporary analysis process is designed to help decision makers gain a clear understanding of the “gaps” between the desired and current performance and the factors or variables impinging on them.
BEA Systems Inc. (2004). BEA training needs analysis. Retrieved January 19, 2006, from www.bea.com/content/news_events/white_papers/BEA_Education_TNA_DS.pdf
2.
Beckschi, P., & Doty, M. (2000). Instructional systems design: A little bit of ADDIEtude, please. In G. M. Piskurich, P. Beckschi, & B. Hall (Eds.), The ASTD handbook of training design and delivery (pp. 28-41). New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Bemis, S., Belenky, A., & Soder, D. (1983). Job analysis: An effective management tool. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
4.
Bernthal, P. (n.d.). Methods for calculating ROI and bottom-line impact. Retrieved February 6, 2006, from www.ddiworld.com/pdf/ddi_methodsforcalculatingroi_wp.pdf
5.
Brannick, M. T., & Levine, E. L. (2002). Job analysis: methods, research, and applications for human resource management in the new millennium. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Clark, D. (2000). Instructional system design—Analysis phase. Retrieved January 2, 2006, from www.nwlink.com/%257Edonclark/hrd/sat2.html%23analysis
7.
Datta, L. (1978). Front-end analysis: Pegasus or shank’s mare?New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1, 13-30.
8.
Dublin, L. (2000). How to plan for technology-based training. In G. M. Piskurich, P. Beckschi, & B. Hall (Eds.), The ASTD handbook of training design and delivery (pp. 158-172). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Finch, C., & Crunkilton, J. (1989). Curriculum development in vocational and technical education: Planning, content, and implementation (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
Gilley, J. W., Eggland, S. A., & Gilley, A. M. (2002). Principles of human resource development (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
11.
Harless, J. H. (1973). An analysis of front-end analysis. Improving Human Performance, 2, 229-244.
12.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2001). Reference guide for instructional design and development. Retrieved January 7, 2006, from www.ieee.org/organizations/eab/tutorials/refguide/mms01.htm
13.
Laird, D. (2003). Approaches to training and development (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
14.
Lee, W., & Owens, D. (2004). Multimedia-based instructional design (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
15.
Malasky, E. W. (1984). Instructional strategies: Nonmedia. In L. Nadler (Ed.), The handbook of human resource development (pp. 9.1-9.31). New York: John Wiley.
16.
Molenda, M., Pershing, J., & Reigeluth, C. (1996). Designing instructional systems. In R. L. Craig (Ed.), The ASTD training & development handbook (4th ed., pp. 266-293). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Nolan, M. (1996). Job training. In R. L. Craig (Ed.), The ASTD training & development handbook (4th ed., pp. 266-293). New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Phillips, J. (1996, April). How much is the training worth?Training and Development, 50(4), 20-24.
19.
Phillips, J., & Phillips, P. (2003). Action plans to measure ROI. Performance Improvement, 42, 22-31.
20.
Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum: design and development. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
21.
Robinson, D. G., & Robinson, J. C. (1989, August). Training for impact. Training and Development Journal, 43(8), 34-42.
22.
Robinson, D. G., & Robinson, J. C. (1996). Performance consulting: Moving beyond training. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
23.
Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: How to manage the white space on the organization chart (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Stenzel, C., & Stenzel, J. (2003). From cost to performance management: A blueprint for organizational development. New York: John Wiley.
25.
Swanson, R. A. (1996). Analysis for improving performance: Tools for diagnosing organizations and documenting workplace expertise. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
26.
Swanson, R. A. (2001). Assessing the benefits of human resource development. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
27.
Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (1998). Developing and maintaining core expertise in the midst of change. National Productivity Review, 17(2), 29-38.
28.
Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2001). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
29.
Valenti, D. (2004). Training budgets step by step: A complete guide to planning and budgeting strategically aligned training. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
30.
Worthen, B. (2001, February 15). Measuring the ROI of training. CIO Magazine. Retrieved February 1, 2006, from www.cio.com/archive/021501/roi.html
31.
Zemke, R., & Gunkler, J. (1985, July 9). Using small group techniques for needs assessment, data gathering, and other heinous acts [Seminar notes, American Society for Training and Development Southern Minnesota Chapter, Minneapolis].
32.
Roberts, P. B. (2006). Analysis: The defining phase of systematic training. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(4), 476-491.
