The problem and the solution. A within-subjects design was used to examine the roles of newcomer race, gender, and proactive socialization attempts on potential mentors’ willingness to engage in peer mentoring. In this laboratory study, 110 White college students participated. Participants were encouraged to participate as mentors in a new peer mentoring program and were provided with the profiles of 12 potential protégés and asked to evaluate each. Results of repeated-measure ANOVA suggested that female participants were more likely to provide mentoring than were male participants and that mentors were more agreeable to mentoring those who were high in proactive socialization attempts regardless of protégés’ race or gender. However, protégé demographic characteristics did influence access to peer mentoring for protégés depicted as low or moderate in proactivity. A discussion of these findings and their implications for human resource development research and practice are offered.
Allen, T. D., Poteet, M. L., Russell, J. E.,& Dobbins, G. H. (1997). Afield study of factors related to supervisors’ willingness to mentor others. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 1-22.
2.
Bell, E. L. (1990). The bicultural life experiences of career oriented Black women. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 459-477.
3.
Bell, E. L.,& Nkomo, S. M. (2001). Our separate ways: Black and White women and the struggle for professional identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
4.
Blake, S. (1999). At the crossroads of race and gender. Lessons from the mentoring experiences of professional Blackwomen. In A. J. Murrell, F. J. Crosby,& R. J. Ely (Eds.), Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations (pp. 83-104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Bowman, S. R., Kite, M. E., Branscombe, N. R., & Williams, S. (1999). Developmental relationships of Black Americans in the academy. InA. J. Murrell, F. J. Crosby,& R. J. Ely (Eds.), Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations (pp. 21-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Cox, T. H.,& Nkomo, S. M. (1991). A race and gender group analysis of the early career experiences of MBAs. Work and Occupations, 18, 431-446.
7.
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435-462.
8.
Davidson, M. N.,& Foster-Johnson, L. (2001). Mentoring in the preparation of graduate researchers of color. Review of Educational Research, 71, 549-575.
9.
Hu, C. Y., Thomas, K. M., & Lance, C. (2004). The impact of individual difference variables on informal mentorship initiations. New Orleans, LA: Academy of Management.
10.
Kram, K. E., & Hall, D. T. (1996). Mentoring in a context of diversity and turbulence. In E. E. Kossek & S. A. Lobel (Eds.), Managing diversity: Human resource strategies for transforming the workplace (pp. 108-136). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
11.
Kram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 110-132.
12.
McGuire, G. M. (1999). Do race and sex affect employees’ access to and help from mentors? Insights from a study of a large corporation. In A. J. Murrell, F. J. Crosby,& R. J. Ely (Eds.), Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations (pp. 105-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Ragins, B. R. (1997). Diversified mentoring relationships in organizations: Apower perspective. Academy of Management, 22, 482-521.
14.
Ragins, B. R. (1999). Gender and mentoring relationship: A review and research agenda for the next decade. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 347-370). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Ragins, B. R., & Cotton, J. L. (1991). Easier said than done: Gender differences in perceived barriers to gaining a mentor. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 939-951.
16.
Saks, M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Organizational socialization: Making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 234-279.
17.
Thomas, D. A. (1990). The impact of race on managers’ experiences of developmental relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 479-492.
18.
Thomas, D. A. (2001). The truth about mentoring minorities: Race matters. Harvard Business Review, 79(4), 99-107.
19.
Thomas, D. A.,& Gabarro, J. J. (1999). Breaking through: The making of minority executives in corporate America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
20.
Thomas, K. M. (2005). Diversity dynamics in the workplace. San Francisco: Thomson-Wadsworth.
21.
Thomas, K. M., & Chrobot-Mason, D. (2005). Demographic group based discrimination: Theories and conclusions. In R. Diboye & A. Colella (Eds.), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 63-88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Wanberg, C. R., Welsh, E. T.,& Hezlett, S. A. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model. In J. J. Martocchio& G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management: Vol. 22 (pp. 39-124). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
23.
Thomas, K. M., Hu, C., Gewin, A. G., Bingham, K., & Yanchus, N. (2005). The roles of protégé race, gender, and proactive socialization attempts on peer mentoring. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(4) 540-555.
