The problem and the solution. What methodologies exist to explore the future of human resource development? This article describes one, the future search conference, and how a global team of volunteers planned and executed the first such conference dedicated to the future of a profession. It summarizes the process, lessons learned, and outcomes in terms of common ground statements. These outcomes are explored in more detail in subsequent articles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bierema, L. L.Bing, J. W., & Carter, T. J. (2002, May). The global pendulum. Training & Development, pp. 70-78.
2.
Bing, J. W. (2001). Developing a consulting tool to measure process change on global teams: The global team process questionnaire. Paper presented at the 2001 Academy of Human Resource Development Conference, Tulsa, OK.
3.
Bunker, B. B., & Alban, B. T. (1997). Large group interventions: Engaging the whole system for rapid change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics, part II: Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1, 143-153.
5.
May, G. L., Carter, T. J., & Dewey, J. D. (2002, February). Collaborating in a Volunteer Virtual Environment: A Case Study on Planning the ASTD/AHRD Future search Conference. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development Annual Meeting, Honolulu, HI.
6.
May, G. L., & Kahnweiler, B. (2002, July). Shareholder value: Is there common ground? Training & Development, pp. 45-52.
7.
Weintraub, R. S., & Martineau, J. (2002, June). The just-in-time imperative. Training & Development, pp. 51-57.
8.
Weisbord, M. R. (1987). Productive workplaces. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Weisbord, M. R. (1992). Discovering common ground. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
10.
Weisbord, M. & Janoff, S. (2000). Future search (2 ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
