The problem and the solution. There continues to be a strong interest in the learning organization construct. This construct has attracted increasing attention conceptually but has been underresearched empirically. Human resource development scholars and practitioners alike face a challenge when they attempt to assess such an abstract idea and its effect on organizational performance. This article shows how the concept of a learning culture can be adequately measured and validated by relating it to organizational performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benson, J., & Hagtvet, K. (1996). The interplay among design, data analysis, and theory in the measurement of coping. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 83-106). New York: John Wiley.
2.
Bollen, K. (1989). structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity of psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
4.
Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E., Yang, B., & Howton, S. W. (2002). The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms' financial performance: An empirical assessment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13, 5-21.
5.
Fleishman, J., & Benson, J. (1987). Using LISREL to evaluate measurement models and scale reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 925-939.
6.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183-202.
7.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In A. Goldberger & D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 85-112). San Diego: Academic Press.
8.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago: SPSS.
9.
MacCallum, R., Wegener, D., Uchino, B., & Fabrigar, L. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 184-199.
10.
Marsick, V., & Watkins, K. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5, 132-151.
11.
Nunnally, J. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-for development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102-111.
13.
Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1996). In action: Creating the learning organization. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
15.
Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1997). Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire (Survey). Warwick, RI: Partners for the Learning Organization.
16.
Yang, B., Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2003). The construct of learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Unpublished manuscript.
