The problem and the solution. This volume presents an anthology of methods for theory building in applied disciplines. Each chapter has described the assumptions and methods of distinct approaches for developing theory. This chapter takes a collective view of research methods for theory building. Although the theorist can choose from a menu of the methods that have been discussed, certain characteristics of the methods themselves can lead to more productive theorizing depending on the particular research purpose of the theorist. This chapter presents a comparative analysis of research methods for theory building that leads to deeper understanding of the methods and their unique contributions to theoretical knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ancona, D. F.
, & Caldwell, D. G. (1990). Information technology and work groups: The case of new product teams. In J. Galegher, R. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of technological work (pp. 173-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Bradshaw-Camball, P.
, & Murray, V. (1991). Illusions and other games: A trifocal view of organizational politics. Organization Science, 2, 379-398.
3.
Brooks, A. K.
(1994). Power and the production of team knowledge: Collective team learning in work organizations. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 5(3), 213-235.
4.
Cairns, G.
, Burt, G., & Beech, N. (2001). Coherence and complexity: Ambiguity and (mis)understanding across management teams. Strategic Change, 10, 23-35.
5.
Currall, S. C.
, Hammer, T. H., Baggett, L. S., & Doniger, G. M. (1999). Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies to study group processes: An illustrative study of a corporate board of directors. Organizational Research Methods, 2(1), 5-36.
6.
Druckman, D.
, & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.). (1991). In the mind’s eye: Enhancing human performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
Dubin, R.
(1978). Theory building (Rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.
8.
Eisenhardt, K. M.
(1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
9.
Evans, C. R.
, & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22(2), 175-186.
10.
Fraser, K. L.
, & Russell, G. M. (2000). The role of the group in acquiring self-defense skills: Results of a qualitative study. Small Group Research, 31(4), 397-423.
11.
Glaser, B.
, & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
12.
Goodman, P. S.
(1979). Assessing organizational change: The Rushton quality of work experiment. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
13.
Hinojosa, J.
, Bedell, G., Buchholtz, E. S., Charles, J., Shigaki, I. S., & Bicchieri, S. M. (2001). Team collaboration: A case study of an early intervention team. Qualitative Health Research, 11(2), 206-220.
14.
Katzenbach, J. R.
, & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. Boston: Harvard Business School.
15.
Lewis, M. W.
, & Grimes, A. J. (1999). Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 672-690.
16.
Macy, B. A.
(1986). Meta-analysis of United States empirical organizational change and work innovation field experiments: Methodology and preliminary results. Paper presented at the 46th annual meeting of the National Academy of Management, Chicago.
17.
Macy, B. A.
, & Izumi, H. (1993). Organizational change, design, and work innovation: A meta-analysis of 131 North American field studies—1961-1991. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 7, 235-313.
18.
McLeod, P. L.
(1992). An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of work groups: Results of a meta-analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 7(3), 257-280.
19.
Perlow, L. A.
(1999). The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 57-81.
20.
Pettigrew, A.
, & Whipp, R. (1991). Managing change for competitive success. London: Blackwell Business.
21.
Sullivan, N.
(1995). Who owns the group? The role of worker control in the development of a group: A qualitative research study of practice. Social Work With Groups, 18(2), 15-32.
22.
Trist, E. L.
, & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of long-wall methods of coal getting. Human Relations, 4, 3-38.
