The problem and the solution. To be effective, workforce development systems need to be managed in a manner that ensures they are coordinated and integrated. In addition, they must have effective performance management systems in place that provide accountability for key outcomes. This chapter provides quality standards for effective workforce development systems in both these areas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baj, J.
, Sheets, R. G., & Trott, C. E. (1996). Building state workforce development systems based on policy coordination and quality assurance. Washington, DC: National Governor’s Association.
2.
Barrow, B.
(1992). The effects of performance standards on state and local programs. In C. F. Manski & I. Garfinkel (Eds.), Evaluating welfare and training programs (pp. 277-309). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Bedford, D.
, & Ganzglass, E. (1992). Introduction: Excellence at work. In E. Ganzglass (Ed.), Excellence at work: Policy option papers for the National Governor’s Association (pp. 1-13). Kalamozoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
4.
Council of Great Lakes Governors
. (1993). Towards the Great Lakes guarantee: New directions in Great Lakes workforce development policy. Ann Arbor, MI: Corporation for a Skilled Workforce.
5.
Governor’s Human Resources Advisory Council
. (1992). Strategies for opportunity: Creating a high performance workforce for Ohio. Columbus: Ohio Bureau of Employment Services.
6.
Grubb, W. N.
(1995). Evaluating job training programs in the United States: Evidence and explanations. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
7.
Grubb, W. N.
(1996a).Creating coherent workforce preparation systems from the quagmire of education and job training. Centerfocus, 13,1-7.
8.
Grubb, W. N.
(1996b). Learning to work: The case for reintegrating job training and education. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
Gueron, J. M.
, & Pauley, E. (1991). From welfare to work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
National Center on Education and the Economy
. (1990). America’s choice: Supporting works (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Author.
11.
New Jersey State Employment and Training Commission
. (1996). A unified state plan for New Jersey’s workforce readiness system: Executive summary. Trenton, NJ: Author.
12.
New York State Department of Labor
. (1996). Policy framework for New York’s workforce development system: Report to the governor. Albany, NY: Author.
13.
Rummler, G. A.
, & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: How to manage the white space on the organization chart (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
14.
Sheets, R. G.
, & Stevens, D. W. (1992). State strategies for building market-based workforce preparation systems. In E. Ganzglass (Ed.), Excellence at work: Policy option papers for the National Governor’s Association (pp. 71-110). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
15.
Stern, D.
, Bailey, T., & Merritt, D. (1996). School-to-work policy insights from recent international developments. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
16.
Trott, C. E.
, & Baj, J. (1996). Building state systems based on performance: The workforce development experience. Washington, DC: National Governor’s Association.
17.
U. S. Department of Labor
. (1989). Work-based learning: Training America’s workers. Washington, DC: Employment and Training Administration, U. S. Department of Labor.
18.
Workforce Coordinating Council
. (1995). Creating Colorado’s workforce development system: Recommendations for the 21st century. Denver, CO: Author.
