The problem and the solution. The promise ofeffective workforce development (WFD) systems is that they will support the sustainable development oforganizations and communities by building the capacity for individuals to be successful in the world of work and to make positive contributions to the communities in which they live. Unfortunately, many WFD systems in the United States are not fulfilling these expectations. A major reason for this failure is lack ofintegration of workforce system elements across several levels. This chapter presents policy, governance, and foundation system standards to address these problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bates, R. A.
(2000, fall).Building effective workforce development systems: Core principles. Journal of Business and Training Education, 9,45-69.
2.
Bailey, T.
(1990).Jobs for the future and the skills they will require. American Educator, 14(1), 10-15, 40-44.
3.
Bailey, T.
(1995). Learning to work: Employer participation in school-to-work programs. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
4.
Baj, J.
, Sheets, R. G., & Trott, C. E. (1996). Building state workforce development systems based on policy coordination and quality assurance. Washington, DC: National Governor’s Association.
5.
Bedford, D.
, & Ganzglass, E. (1992). Introduction: Excellence at work. In E. Ganzglass (Ed.), Excellence at work: Policy option papers for the National Governor’s Association (pp. 1-13). Kalamozoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
6.
Bessant, J.
(1991). Managing advanced manufacturing technology: The challenge of the fifth wave. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
7.
Bishop, J.
, & Montgomery, M. (1993).Does the Target Jobs Tax Credit create jobs at subsidized firms?Industrial Relations, 32,289-306.
8.
Blalock, A.
(1993).Workforce quality and competitiveness: What can we learn and use from expert opinion and research?Evaluation Forum, 9,60-77.
9.
Council of Great Lakes Governors
. (1993). Toward the Great Lakes: New directions in Great Lakes workforce development policy. Ann Arbor, MI: Corporation for a Skilled Workforce.
10.
Finch, C.
(1993).The high performance workplace and the evolving nature of vocational education research. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 18,1-19.
11.
Galhardi, R. M. A. A.
(1998).Changing occupational structures and human resource development: Implications for developing countries’regional and global integration. Science and Public Policy, 25(1), 55-64.
12.
Glover, R. W.
(1993). Developing a system of skill standards and certification for the Texas workforce. Austin, TX: Texas Department of Commerce.
13.
Governor’s Human Resources Advisory Council
. (1992). Strategies for opportunity: Creating a high performance workforce for Ohio. Columbus: Ohio Bureau of Employment Services.
14.
Grubb, W. N.
(1995). Evaluating job training programs in the United States: Evidence and explanations. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
15.
Grubb, W. N.
(1996a).Creating coherent workforce preparation systems from the quagmire of education and job training. Centerfocus, 13,1-7.
16.
Grubb, W. N.
(1996b). Learning to work: The case for reintegrating job training and education. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
Gueron, J. M.
, & Pauley, E. (1991). From welfare to work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
Hatry, H. P.
, Voytek, K. P., & Holmes, A. E. (1989). Building innovation into program reviews: An analysis of service delivery alternatives. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Marshall, R.
, & Tucker, M. (1992). Thinking for a living: Work, skills, and the future of the American economy. New York: Basic Books.
21.
National Center on Education and the Economy
. (1995). Building a system to invest in people: States on the cutting edge. New York: Author.
22.
New Jersey State Employment and Training Commission
. (1996). A unified state plan for New Jersey’s workforce readiness system: Executive summary. Trenton, NJ: Author.
23.
New York State Department of Labor
. (1996). Policy framework for New York’s workforce development system: Report to the governor. Albany, NY: Author.
24.
Olmstead, B.
, & Trippe, S. (1995). The flexible workplace. In E. Ganzglass (Ed.), Excellence at work: Policy option papers for the National Governor’s Association (pp. 111-150). Kalamozoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
25.
Oregon Workforce Quality Council
. (1995). Executive summary of the bottom line: A report to the Oregon Workforce Quality Council. Salem, OR: Author.
26.
Osterman, R.
(1995). Involving employees in school-to-work programs. In T. R. Bailey (Ed.), Learning to work: Employer participation in school-to-work transition programs (pp. 75-87). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
27.
Perez, C.
(1994). Technical change and the new context for development. In L. Mytelka (Ed.), South-south cooperation in a global perspective (pp. 55-88). Paris: OECD.
28.
Riddell, A. R.
(1996).Globalization: Emasculation or opportunity for educational planning. World Development, 24,1357-1372.
29.
Rothwell, W. J.
, & Sredl, W. J. (1992). The ASTD reference guide to professional human resource development roles and competencies (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Rummler, G. A.
, & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: How to manage the white space on the organization chart (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
31.
Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills
. (1991). What work requires of schools: SCANS report for America 2000. U. S. Department of Labor. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
32.
Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills
. (1992). Learning a living: A blueprint for high performance: SCANS report for America 2000. U. S. Department of Labor. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
33.
Sheets, R. G.
, & Stevens, D. W. (1992). State strategies for building market-based workforce preparation systems. In E. Ganzglass (Ed.), Excellence at work: Policy option papers for the National Governors’Association (pp. 71-110). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
34.
Stern, D.
, Bailey, T., & Merritt, D. (1996).School-to-work policy insights from recent international developments. Centerfocus, 14,1-6.
35.
Stern, D.
, Finkelstein, N., Stone, J. R. III, Latting, J., & Dornsife, C. (1994). Research on school-to-work transition programs in the United States. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
36.
Trott, C. E.
, & Baj, J. (1996). Building state systems base on performance: The workforce development experiences. Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association.
37.
U. S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment
. (1995). Learning to work: Making the transition from school to work (OTA-HER-673). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
38.
Uzumeri, M. V.
(1997).ISO 9000 and other metastandards: Principles for management practice?Academy of Management Executives, 11(1), 21-36.
39.
Vining, A. R.
, & Weimer, D. L. (1990).Government supply and government production failure: A framework based on contestability. Journal of Public Policy, 10(1), 1-22.
