The
Problem
and
the
Solution. Different views of the individual and the organization exist among HRD professionals Articulating and embracing these different views within the context of particular interventions or research efforts will inform these efforts and help to create an evolving definition of H RD
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
The American Heritage Dictionary (2nd ed.). (1985). Boston: Houghton Mifflin
2.
Black's Law Dictionary (2000). St. Paul, MN : West Group.
3.
Ruona, W.E.A. (1999). An investigation into core beliefs underlying the profession of human resource developmentSt. Paul, MN: University of Mmnesota, HRD Research Center.
4.
Ruona, W.E.A. (2000). Should we define the profession of HRD? Views of leading scholars In P. Kuchinke (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development (pp. 188-195). Baton Rouge, LA: Academy of Human Resource Development .
5.
Ruona, W.E.A., & Swanson, R.A. (1998) Foundations of human resource development
6.
In B. R. Stewart & H. C. Hall (Eds.), Beyond tradition: Preparing HRD educators for tomorrow's workforce (pp. 1-31) Columbia, MO: University Council for Workforce and Human Resource Education.
7.
Weinberger, L.A. (1998). Commonly held theories of human resource developmentHuman Resource Development International , 1(1), 75-93.
