AlcoffL.PotterE. (1993). Introduction: When feminisms intersect epistemology. In AlcoffL.PotterE. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
2.
ChakrabartyD. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
3.
CodeL. (2006). Ecological thinking: The politics of epistemic location. Oxford University Press.
4.
ConnellR. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Polity Press.
5.
DuttaM. J.PalM. (2020). Theorizing from the Global South: Dismantling, resisting, and transforming communication theory. Communication Theory, 30(4), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa010
6.
GajjalaR. (2019). Digital diasporas: Labor and affect in gendered Indian digital publics. Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
HardingS. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
8.
HardingS. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity?”The Centennial Review, 36(3), 437–470. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23739232
9.
MohantyC. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Duke University Press.
10.
NgE.ClickM. A. (2025). Democratizing publishing in communication/media studies: A case study of communication, culture & critique. Online Media and Global Communication, 4(1), 140–164. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2024-0059
11.
SantosB. de. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
12.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. Zed Books Ltd.
13.
SpivakG. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In NelsonC.GrossbergL. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
