The essay addresses these questions: What is news? Why do we have news? My answers involve the synthesis of theories from biology and culture; I also show how the constructs time and reality can be used in news studies. Deviance is my primary construct, which in biology is defined as a threat or something novel in the environment. In studies of culture, deviance is defined according to whether the rules and norms of a society are followed. People are innately hard wired to survey the environment and attend to threats, but threats are defined by culture. The brain’s circuitry prioritizes information about negative stimuli, which results in more negative news than positive or neutral.
AndrewsM. (2007). Exploring cross-cultural boundaries. In ClaudininJ. (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry methodologies (pp. 498–512). SAGE.
2.
Araya-AjoyY. G.WestneatD. F.WrightJ. (2020). Pathways to social evolution and their evolutionary feedback. Evolution, 74(9), 1894–1907. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14054
3.
AtranS.SheikhH. (2015). Dangerous terrorists as devoted actors. In Zeigler-HillV.WellingL.ShackelfordT. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 465–477). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_31
4.
BatesonP. (2013). New thinking about biological evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 112, 268–275.
5.
BoyceW. T.SokolowskiM. B.RobinsonG. E. (2020). Genes and environments, development and time. PNAS, 117, 23235–23241. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2016710117
6.
BrekhusW. H. (2015). Culture and cognition. Polity Press.
7.
CacioppoJ. T.DecetyJ. (2011). An introduction to social neuroscience. In DecetyJ.CacioppoJ. T. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 3–8). Oxford University Press.
8.
ChadwickA. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
9.
CoulsonT. (2021). Environmental perturbations and transitions between ecological and evolutionary equilibria: An eco-evolutionary feedback framework. Peer Community Journal, 1, Article e6. https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.4
10.
CritchleyS. (2020). Patriots of two nations: Why Trump was inevitable and what happens next. McDavid Media.
11.
DarwinC. (1936a). The descent of man. Random House. (Original work published 1871)
12.
DarwinC. (1936b). The origin of species. Random House. (Original work published 1859)
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
15.
FiddickL. (2015). Social by design: How social psychology cane more cognitive without being less social. In Zeigler-HillV.WellingL. M.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 451–463). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007//978-3-319-12697-5_2
16.
FigueredoA. J.PatchE. A.CeballosC. E. G. (2015). A life history approach to the dynamics of social selection. In Zeigler-HillV.WellingL. M.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 363–372). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_28
17.
GolanG. J. (2008). Where in the world is Africa? Predicting coverage of Africa by U.S. television networks. The International Communication Gazette, 70(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048507084577
Harmon-JonesE.Harmon-JonesC. (2015). Neural foundations of motivational orientations. In GendollaG.TopsM.KooleS. (Eds.), Handbook of biobehavioral approaches to self-regulation (pp. 175–187). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1236-0_12
20.
HofmannH. A.BeeryA. K.BlumsteinD. T.CouzinI. D.EarleyR. L.HayesL. D.HurdP. L.LaceyE. A.PhelpsS. M.SolomonN. G.TaborskyM.YoungL. J.RubensteinD. R.; NESCent Working Group on Integrative Models of Vertebrate Sociality: Evolution, Mechanisms, and Emergent Properties (2014). An evolutionary framework for studying mechanisms of social behavior. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 10, 581–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.008
21.
KubrinC. E.StuckyT. D.KrohnM. D. (2008). Researching theories of crime and deviance. Oxford University Press.
22.
LasswellH. D. (1971). The structure and function of communication in society. In SchrammW. (Ed.), The process and effects of mass communication (pp. 84–99). University of Illinois Press. (Original work published 1948).
23.
LeDouxJ. (2003). The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 23(4/5), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025048802629
24.
LeeJ. H. (2008). Effects of news deviance and personal involvement on audience story selection: A web-tracking analysis. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900808500104
25.
LeottiL. A.DelgadoM. R. (2011). Processing social and nonsocial rewards in the human brain. In DecetyJ.CacioppoJ. T. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 178–194). Oxford University Press.
26.
LopezR. B.VohsK. D.WagnerD. D.HeathertonT. F. (2015). Self-regulatory strength: Neural mechanisms and implications for training. In GendollaG.TopsM.KooleS. (Eds.), Handbook of biobehavioral approaches to self-regulation (pp. 43–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1236-0_4
27.
MendelG. (2018). Experiments in plant hybridization: The genetic heredity demonstrated by hybrids of garden peas. http://www.netspace.org/mendelweb [Versuche über Plflanzen-hybriden. Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Ver-eines in Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr 1865, Abhand-lungen, 3–47 (1866) (Bateson translation)]. (Original work published 1865)
28.
MurtyV. P.LaBarK. S.AdcockR. A. (2012). Threat of punishment motivates memory encoding via amygdala, not midbrain, interactions with the medial temporal lobe. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(26), 8969–8976. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0094-12.2012
29.
NisbettR. E.PengK.ChoiI.NorenzayanA. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
30.
O’ConnellL. A.HofmannH. A. (2010). Genes hormones, and circuits: An integrative approach to study the evolution of social behavior. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32, 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfne.2010.12.004
31.
ParrL. A.WallerB. M. (2011). The evolution of social cognition. In DecetyJ.CacioppoJ. T. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 39–48). Oxford University Press.
PetersK.JettenJ.RadovaD.AustinK. (2017). Gossiping about deviance: Evidence that deviance spurs the gossip that builds bonds. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1610–1619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617716918
34.
PetersonM. F.SøndergaardM.KaraA. (2018). Traversing cultural boundaries in IB [international business]: The complex relationships between explicit country and implicit cultural group boundaries at multiple levels. Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 1081–1099.
35.
PhillipsW.MilnerR. M. (2020). You are here: A field guide for navigating polarized speech, conspiracy theories, and our polluted media landscape. MIT Press.
36.
PritchardD.HughesK. D. (1997). Patterns of deviance in crime news. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 49–67.
37.
PruessnerJ. C.BaldwinM. (2015). Biological aspects of self-esteem and stress. In GendollaG.TopsM.KooleS. (Eds.), Handbook of biobehavioral approaches to self-regulation (pp. 385–395). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1236-0_25
38.
RobinsonG. E.FernaldR. D.ClaytonD. F. (2008). Genes and social behavior. Science, 322, 896–900. https://www.sciencemag.org
39.
SchrammW. (1960). Mass communications (2nd ed.). University of Illinois Press.
40.
SchrammW. (1988). The story of human communication. Harper & Row.
41.
SefcekJ. A.BlackC. J.WolfP. S. (2015). Evolutionary perspectives of personality. In Zeigler-HillV.WellingL.ShackelfordT. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 465–477). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_35
42.
ShoemakerP. J. (1996). Hard-wired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01487.x
43.
ShoemakerP. J. (2017). News values: Reciprocal effects on journalists and journalism. In The international encyclopedia of media effects. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0053
44.
ShoemakerP. J.CohenA. (2006). News around the world: Content, practitioners and the public. Routledge.
45.
ShoemakerP. J.DanielianL. H.BrendlingerN. (1991). Deviant acts, risky business and U.S. interests: The newsworthiness of world events. Journalism Quarterly, 68(4), 781–795.
46.
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. Routledge.
47.
ShoemakerP. J.VosT. P. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge.
48.
SmithK. (2011). Learning bias, cultural evolution of language, and the biological evolution of the language faculty. Human Biology, 83(2), 261–278.
49.
SorokaS.FournierP.NirL. (2019). Cross-national evidence of a negatively bias in psychophysiological reactions to news. PNAS Direct, 116(38), 18888–18892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116
50.
StephensM. (1988). A history of news: From the drum to the satellite. Viking.
51.
TarasV.SteelP.KirkmanB. L. (2016). Does country equate with culture? Beyond geography in the search for cultural boundaries. Management International Review, 56, 455–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0283-x
52.
Van den BergP.WeissingF. J. (2015). Evolutionary game theory and personality. In Zeigler-HillV.WellingL. L. M.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 451–463). Springer.
53.
Van DillenL. F.PaplesE. K. (2015). From distraction to mindfulness: Psychological and neural mechanisms of attention strategies in self-regulation. In GendollaG. H. E.TopsM.KooleS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of biobehavioral approaches to self-regulation (pp. 141–154). Springer.
54.
Van SteenbergenH. (2015). Affective modulation of cognitive control: A bio behavioral perspective. In GendollaG.TopsM.KooleS. (Eds.), Handbook of biobehavioral approaches to self-regulation (pp. 89–107). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1236-0_7
WinkielmanP.BerridgeK.SherS. (2011). Emotion, consciousness, and social behavior. In DecetyJ.CacioppoJ. T. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 195–211). Oxford University Press.
Zeigler-HillV.WellingL. L. H.ShackelfordT. K. (2015). How can an understanding of evolutionary psychology contribute to social psychology? In Zeigler-HillV.WellingL.ShackelfordT. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 451–463). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_1
