The recent commercial boom in women's skin-lightening or “fairness” cosmetics in India is part of the larger context of escalating lifestyle consumerism in Asia's emerging market nations. This monograph examines the cultural politics of gender, nation, beauty and skin color in the persuasive narratives of Indian magazine advertisements and television commercials for fairness cosmetics and personal care products. We situate advertising's compact stories of ideal femininity within the sociology of colorism's transnational links to hierarchies of race, gender, caste, ethnicity and class and the rapid economic growth in the skin-lightening cosmetics sector in India over the past decade. Deconstructing advertising's visual and linguistic fields of meaning, our analysis dissects the rhetorical themes of bodily and personal transformation, modern and traditional science, and heterosexual romance that operate together to inflate the currency of light-skinned beauty. In conclusion, we outline recent challenges to the hegemony of colorism in India and suggest directions for future research that can build on this monograph's scrutiny of advertising's regulatory regimes of beauty.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsP. C.GhoseR. (2003) India.com: The construction of a space betweenProgress in Human Geography27 (4), 414–437.
2.
AlloulaM. (1986). The colonial harem. (GodzichM.GodzichW., Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1981).
3.
Anagol-McGinnP. (1994). Sexual harassment in India: A case study of eve teasing in historical perspective. In Anagol-McGinnP.BrantC.TooY. L. (Eds.), Rethinking sexual harassment (pp. 220–234). Boulder, CO: Pluto Press.
4.
AnandA. (2002). The beauty game. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
5.
ApplebaumR. P.RobinsonW.I. (2005). Critical globalization studies. New York: Routledge.
6.
AsthanaS. (2003) Patriotism and its avatars: Tracking the national-global dialectic in Indian music videosJournal of Communication Inquiry27 (4), 337–353.
7.
BagilholeB. (1997). Sexual violence in India: Eve teasing as backlash. In ThomasA.KitzingerC. (Eds.), Sexual harassment: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 102–121). Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
8.
BanksT. L. (2000) Colorism: A darker shade of paleUCLA Law Review47 (6), 1705–1746.
BergerA. A. (2004). Ads, fads, and consumer culture: Advertising's impact on American character and society. Oxford, U.K.: Rowman & Littlefield.
13.
BergerJ. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.
14.
BoseR. (2000, September 1). Dark is beautiful: Chocolate cream. Femina, 13–18.
15.
BourdieuP. (1991). Language and symbolic power. (RaymondG.AdamsonM., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
CallahanW. A. (1998) The ideology of Miss Thailand in national, consumerist, and transnational spaceAlternatives: Social Transformation & Human Governance23 (1), 29–62.
17.
CeliousA.OysermanD. (2001) Race from the inside: An emerging heterogeneous race modelJournal of Social Issues57 (1), 149–165.
18.
ChakrabartyD. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
EdwardsA. (2000, November 1). The dark side. Femina, 18.
29.
EspinoR.FrantzM. M. (2002) Latino phenotypic discrimination revisited: The impact of skin color on occupational statusSocial Science Quarterly83 (2), 612–623.
FalconerJ.NevilleH. (2000) African-American college women's body image: An examination of body mass, African self-consciousness, and skin color satisfactionPsychology of Women Quarterly24 (3), 236–243.
32.
FarisJ. (2002). The gaze of western humanism. In AskewK.WilkR. (Eds.), The anthropology of media: A reader (pp. 77–91). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
33.
FernandesL. (2000) Nationalizing the global: Media images, cultural politics, and the middle class in IndiaMedia, Culture, and Society22 (5), 611–628.
34.
FullerT. (2006, May 14). A vision of pale beauty carries risks for Asia's women. New York Times, p. A3.
35.
GawleR. (2002, October 24). Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the fairest of them all?India Abroad, p. A8.
36.
GibsonD. F. (1931) Concerning ColorPsychoanalytic Review18, 412–425.
37.
Godrej aims to cream fairness market. (2000, July 20). The Economic Times, p. 3.
GoffmanE. (1979). Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.
40.
GoldmanR. (1992). Reading ads socially. New York: Routledge.
41.
GomezC. (2000) The continual significance of skin color: An exploratory study of Latinos in the NortheastHispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences22 (1), 94–103.
42.
GordonJ. (1996). Cultural atlas of India. New York: Facts on File, Inc.
43.
GoswamiN. (2003, February 19). Turmeric gets a fairness cream coat. The Economic Times, p. B2.
HallR. (1993/2003). Skin color as a post-colonial issue among Asian Americans. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
50.
HallR. (1995) The bleaching syndrome: African Americans' response to cultural domination vis-à-vis skin colorJournal of Black Studies26 (2), 172–184.
51.
HallR.RussellK.WilsonM. (1992). The color complex: The politics of color among African-Americans. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
52.
HammondA.PrahaladCK. (2004, May/June). Selling to the poor. Foreign Policy. Retrieved February 25, 2006, from http://www.ckprahalad.com.
53.
HerringCKeithV.HortonD. (2004). Skin/Deep: How race and complexion matter in the “color blind” era. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
54.
HerskovitsM. (1968). “The Negro's Americanism.” In LockeA. (Ed.), The new Negro: An interpretation (pp. 353–360). New York: Arno Press.
55.
HillM. E. (2000) Color difference in the socioeconomic status of African-American men: Results of a longitudinal studySocial Forces78 (4), 1437–1460.
56.
HillM. E. (2002). Skin color and the perception of attractiveness among African-Americans: Does gender make a difference?Social Psychology Quarterly, 65 (1), 77–91.
57.
Hill-CollinsP. (1999). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London: Routledge.
58.
HoltzmanJ. (1973) Color caste changes among Black college studentsJournal of Black Studies4 (1), 92–101.
59.
HunterM. L. (2002) If you're light, you're alright: Light skin color as social capital for women of colorGender & Society16 (2), 175–193.
60.
India's cosmetics industry. (2002, May 16–30). The Brand Reporter, 12.
61.
JeffreyR. (2000). India's newspaper revolution. New York: St. Martin's Press.
JhallyS. (1990). The codes of advertising: Fetishism and the political economy of meaning. London: Routledge.
64.
JohnsonJ. H.Jr.FarrellW.C. (1995, July 7). Race still matters. The Chronicle of Higher Education, A48.
65.
JosephM. (2000, January 24). Bodies to nobodies. Outlook, 70–73.
66.
KeenanK. (1996) Skin tones and physical features of blacks in magazine advertisementsJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly73 (4), 905–912.
67.
KeithV.HerringC. (1991) Skin tone and stratification in the black communityAmerican Journal of Sociology97 (3), 760–778.
68.
Kern-FoxworthM. (1990) Plantation kitchen to American icon: Aunt JemimaPublic Relations Review36(3), 55–67.
69.
KumarS. (2004) Inside the home theater: The hyper-real world of television in IndiaSouth Asian Popular Culture2 (2), 127–144.
70.
LalvaniS. (1995) Consuming the exotic otherCritical Studies in Mass Communication12 (3), 263–286.
71.
LearsT. J. J. (1983). From salvation to self-realization: Advertising and the therapeutic roots of the consumer culture, 1880–1930. In FoxR.W.LearsT. J. J. (Eds.), The culture of consumption: Critical essays in American history, 1880–1980 (pp. 1–38). New York: Pantheon Books.
MunshiS. (1998) Wife/mother/daughter-in-law: Multiple avatars of homemaker in 1990s Indian advertisingMedia, Culture & Society20 (4), 573–591.
85.
NarayanaswamyH. (2003, March 5). The dark side of the tube. The Economic Times, pp. 1–2.
86.
NealA. M.WilsonM. L. (1989) The role of skin color and features in the Black community: Implications for black women and therapyClinical Psychology Review9, 323–333.
87.
New marketplace: A summary of the NCAER report. (1996). Business Today, 5 (4), 6–11.
ParameswaranR. (2004) Global queens, national celebrities: Tales of feminine triumph in post-liberalization IndiaCritical Studies in Media Communication21 (4), 346–370.
92.
ParameswaranR.CardozaK. (2009) Immortal comics, epidermal politics: Gender and colorism in IndiaJournal of Children and Media3 (1), 19–34.
Promotion and beauty buzz. (2000, February). Cosmopolitan (India), 90.
96.
PrystayC. (2002, April 30). Critics say ads for skin whiteners capitalize on Malaysian prejudice. The Wall Street Journal Online. Retrieved February 25, 2006, from http://www.calbaptist.edu/dskubik/white_skin.htm.
97.
RahmanR. B. (2002). Color as a status: The role of skin color among Hindu Indian women. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Rutgers University.
98.
RajagopalA. (1998) Advertising, politics, and the sentimental education of the Indian consumerVisual Anthropology Review14 (2), 14–31.
99.
RajagopalA. (2001). Politics after television: Hindu nationalism and the reshaping of the public in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100.
ReddyV. (2006). The nationalization of the global Indian woman: Geographies of beauty in Femina. South Asian Popular Culture, 4 (1), 61–85.
101.
RothenbergP. S. (1995). Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study. New York: St. Martin's Press.
102.
RoyV. (1999, July 8). All's war in fairness creams. The Hindu Business Line, p. 3.
103.
RundleR. (2007, January 16). Doctors, FDA spar over fade creams. Wall Street Journal, p. D8.
104.
SachdevaP. (2001, March 17). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Which product makes me fairest of all! Retrieved February 8, 2005, from http://www.indiainfoline.com.
105.
SahayS.PiranN. (1997) Body satisfaction among South Asian and European female university studentsThe Journal of Social Psychology237(2), 161–172.
106.
SaifeeM. (2006, May/June). From “Wheatish to dark”: Globalization, marriage & skin color commodification. Jade Magazine. Retrieved January 16, 2007, from http://www.jademagazine.com/59iss_saifeer.html.
107.
ScottC. (1996). Sushmita and Aishwarya: Symbols of national pride? VoicesA Journal on Communication for Development, 4 (3), 16–18.
108.
SeedatM.MackenzieS.MohanD. (2006) The phenomenology of being a female pedestrian in an African and Asian cityTransportation Research9 (2), 139–153.
109.
SenguptaS. (2002, January). Gora chhoras. Savvy, 56–58.
110.
ShatrujeetN. (2004, July 1–15). More Lovely than Fair?The Brand Reporter, 18–19.
111.
ShohatE.StamR. (2002). The imperial imaginary. In AskewK.WilkR. (Eds.), The anthropology of media: A reader [pp. 117–147). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
112.
SimmonsA. (2000, August 15). Quest for light skin is darkening lives in Africa. Los Angeles Times, p. A10.
SinhaS. (2000, December 6). Skin care: Fair and growing. India Today, 48.
115.
SmithD. (1990). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London: Routledge.
116.
StolerA. L. (2002). Carnal knowledge and imperial power: Race and the intimate in colonial rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.
117.
StolerA. L.CooperF. (1997). Between metropole and colony. In StolerA. L.CooperF. (Eds.), Tensions of empire: Colonial cultures in a bourgeois world (pp. 1–56). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
118.
RajanR. Sunder (1993). Real and imagined women: Gender, culture and postcolonialism. London: Routledge.
WaldC. (2003). Black is beautiful, but fair is feminine: Images of black couples in magazines. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University, Bloomington.
