The media ethics literature is filled both with calls to more clearly define the values that govern media practitioners and with claims about which values ought to drive good journalism. Yet virtually nowhere in the field has social psychology research into the nature of values been brought to bear on this discussion. Based on an analysis of a series of in-depth interviews with 15 newspaper journalists in California, New Jersey and North Carolina, this examination of how journalists perceive, articulate and seek to embody their personal values in their work suggests that, far from working in a moral vacuum, journalists bring to bear a number of morality-based and competency-based values on their everyday ethical decision-making. Drawing from the body of value-theory research in social psychology, the analysis suggests that 1) journalists may have an inadequate conceptualization of journalistic autonomy; 2) the field suffers from an excessively wide range in the degree to which journalists embrace the goal of transparent deliberation; and 3) the journalistic admonition to “minimize harm” requires clarification within the profession.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenA.L. (2003). Why journalists can't protect privacy. In Journalism and the debate over privacy (LaMayC.L., Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
2.
American Society of Newspaper Editors. (1985). Newspaper credibility: Building reader trust.Washington, D.C.: ASNE.
3.
ArberS. (2001). Designing samples. In Researching social life (GilbertN., Ed.). London: Sage Publications.
4.
ArnesonR.J. (1997). “Paternalism, Utility and Fairness.” In Mill's ‘On Liberty’: Critical Essays, DworkinG., Ed., Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
BakerS. (1997). Applying Kidder's ethical decision-making checklist to media ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 12 (4), 197–210.
6.
BarrettD. (Ed.). (1961). Values in America.Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
7.
BeckerB.W.ConnorP.E. (1981). Personal values of the heavy user of mass media. Journal of Advertising Research, 21 (5), 37–43.
8.
BerlinI. (1969). Four essays on liberty.London: Oxford University Press.
9.
BlackJ.BarneyR.D.Van TubergenG.N. (1979). Moral development and belief systems of journalists. Mass Communications Review, 6, 4–16.
10.
BlackJ.SteeleB.BarneyR. (1999). Doing ethics in Journalism: A handbook with case studies (3rd Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
11.
BoeyinkD.E. (1992). Casuistry: A case-based method for journalists. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 72, 107–120.
12.
BokS. (1995). Common values.Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
13.
BokS. (1999). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life.New York: Vintage.
14.
BreedW. (1955). “Social control in the newsroom.”Social forces, 33 (4), 326–335.
15.
BuchananA. (1979). “Autonomy and categories of freedom of expression: A reply to Professor Scanlon.”University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 40, 551–559.
16.
BurgessS.M. (1992). Personal values and consumer research: An historical perspective. In ShethJ.N. (Ed.), Research in Marketing, 11, 35–79. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
17.
ChristiansC.G. (2004). “Ethical and normative perspectives.” In The Sage handbook of media studies (DowningJ.D.H., Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
ChristiansC.G. (2005). Ethical theory in communications research. Journalism Studies6 (1), 3–14.
19.
ChristiansC.G.FacklerP.M.RotzollK.B.McKeeK.B. (2001). Media ethics: cases and moral reasoning (6th Ed.). New York: Longman.
20.
ChristiansC.G.FerréJ.P.FacklerP.M. (1993). Good news: Social ethics and the press.New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
ChristiansC.G.TraberM. (Eds.). (1997). Communication ethics and universal values.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
The Commission on the Freedom of the Press. (1947). A free and responsible press.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
ComstockG.ScharrerE. (1999). Television: What's on, who's watching, and what it means.San Diego: Academic Press.
24.
CoplestonF. (1964). A history of philosophy, Vol. 6, Part II: Kant.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
25.
CunninghamS.B. (1999). Getting it right: Aristotle's ‘golden mean’ as theory deterioration. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 14 (1), 5–15.
26.
DavisN.A. (1991). Contemporary deontology. In SingerP. (Ed.), A companion to ethics.Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
27.
EdelsteinA.S.TefftD.P. (1974). Media credibility and respondent credulity with respect to Watergate. Communication Research, 1 (4), 426–439.
28.
EdwardsT.J.GallowayT.D. (1981). Freedom and equality: Dimensions of the political ideology among city managers and city planners. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 17 (2), 173–193.
29.
ElliottD. (1997). Universal values and moral development theories. In ChristiansC.TraberM. (Eds.), Communication ethics and universal values.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
GansH.J. (1979). Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time.New York: Vintage.
31.
GardnerH.CsikszentmihalyiM.DamonW. (2001). Good work: When excellence and ethics meet.New York: Basic Books.
32.
GazianoC.McGrathK. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63 (3), 451–462.
33.
GilbertN.MulkayM. (1983). In search of the action. In GilbertN.AbellP. (Eds.), Accounts and action.Aldershot: Gower.
34.
GoodinR.E. (1991). Utility and the good. In SingerP. (Ed.), A companion to ethics.Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
35.
GuntherA. (1988). Attitude extremity and trust in the media. Journalism Quarterly, 56 (2), 279–287.
36.
GuntherA. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147–167.
37.
GuntherA.LasorsaD.L. (1986). Issue importance and trust in mass media. Journalism Quarterly63 (4), 844–848.
38.
HarrisonA.A. (1976). Individuals and groups: Understanding social behavior.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
39.
HaydonG. (1978). On being responsible. Philosophical Quarterly, p. 46–51.
40.
HickeyN. (2001). Morale matters: Low and getting lower. Columbia Journalism Review (September/October), 37–39.
41.
HolsteinJ.A.GubriumJ.F. (1995). The active interview (Vol. 37: Qualitative research methods). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42.
HovlandC.I.WeissW. (1951) The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650.
43.
JacquetteD. (2007). Journalism ethics: Moral responsibility in the media.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
44.
KidderR.M. (1995). How good people make tough choices.New York: William Morrow and Co.
45.
KlaidmanS.BeauchampT.L. (1987). The virtuous journalist.New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
KoeskeG.F.CrouseM.A. (1981). Liberalism-conservatism in samples of social work students and professionals. Social Service Review (June), 193–205.
47.
KohutA. (2000, May/June). “Self-censorship: Counting the ways.”Columbia Journalism Review, 43.
48.
KovachB.RosenstielT. (2001). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect.New York: Crown.
49.
KvaleS. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
50.
LambethE.B. (1992). Committed journalism: An ethic for the profession.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
51.
LordC.G.RossL.LepperM.R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
52.
MalcolmJ. (1990). The journalist and the murderer.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
53.
McCartyJ.A.ShrumL.J. (1993). The role of personal values and demographics in predicting television viewing behavior: Implications for theory and application. Journal of Advertising, 22 (4), 77–96.
54.
McQuailD. (1994). Mass communication theory: An introduction.London: Sage.
55.
McSheaR.J. (1990). Morality and human nature: A new route to ethical theory.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
56.
MerrillJ.C. (1990). The imperative of freedom: A philosophy of journalistic autonomy.New York: Freedom House.
57.
MerrillJ.C. (1997). Journalism ethics: Philosophical foundations for news media.New York: St. Martin's Press.
58.
MeyerP. (1987). Ethical journalism: A guide for students, practitioners and consumers.New York: Longman.
59.
MeyerP. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly65 (3), 567–590.
60.
MillsC.W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904–913.
OverholserG.JamiesonK.H., (Eds.) (2005). Institutions of American democracy: The press.New York: Oxford University Press.
63.
ParsonsT. (1968). On the concept of value-commitments. Sociological Inquiry, 38, 135–159.
64.
PasqualiA. (1997). The Moral Dimension of Communicating. In ChristiansC.G.TraberM. (Eds.), Communication ethics and universal values.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
PerryR. (1954). Realms of value: A critique of human civilization.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
Pew Research Center for The People and The Press. (2004). How journalists see journalists: Views on profits, performance and politics. Available: http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/214.pdf. Retrieved July 27 2007.
PlaisanceP.L. (2005). The mass media as discursive network: Building on the implications of libertarian and communitarian claims for news media ethics theory. Communication Theory15 (3), 292–313.
69.
PlaisanceP.L. (2007). Transparency: An assessment of the Kantian roots of a key principle of media ethics practice. Journal of Mass Media Ethics22 (2–3), 187–207.
70.
PlaisanceP.L.SkewesE.A. (2003). Personal and professional dimensions of news work: Exploring the link between journalists' values and roles. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly80 (4), 833–848.
71.
RichC. (1999). Writing and reporting the news: A coaching method.3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
72.
RokeachM. (1968). The role of values in public opinion research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32 (4), 547–559.
73.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values.New York: Free Press.
74.
RokeachM. (1979). Understanding human values: Individual and societal.New York: The Free Press.
75.
RokeachM.Ball-RokeachS. (1989). Stability and change in American value priorities, 1968–1981. American Pyschologist, 44 (5), 775–784.
76.
RosenJeffrey (2000). The unwanted gaze: The destruction of privacy in America.New York: Random House.
77.
SamarajivaR. (1997). Interactivity as though privacy mattered. In AgreP.E.RotenbergM. (Eds.), Technology and privacy: The new landscape.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78.
ScanlonT.M. (1998). What we owe to each other.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79.
SchwartzS.H.BilskyW. (1987). “Toward a universal psychological structure of human values.”Journal of personality and social psychology, 53, 550–562.
80.
ShoemakerP.J. (1997). A new gatekeeping model. In BerkowitzD. (Ed.), Social meanings of news: A text-reader (pp. 57–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81.
ShoemakerP.J.ReeseS.D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content.New York: Longman.
82.
SilvermanD. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
83.
SingletaryM.CaudillS.CaudillE.WhiteA. (1990). Motives for ethical decisionmaking. Journalism & Mass Communications Quarterly, 67 (4), 964–972.
84.
SmithS.W.EllisJ.B.YooH.J. (2001). Memorable messages as guides to self-assessment of behavior: The role of instrumental values. Communication Monographs, 68 (4), 325–339.
85.
SpatesJ.L. (1983). The sociology of values. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 27–49.
86.
StockerM. (1990). Plural and conflicting values.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
87.
Times Mirror Center for The People & The Press. (1995). The people, the press & their leaders.Los Angeles: Times-Mirror.
88.
TuchmanG. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality.New York: Free Press.
89.
ValloneR.P.RossL.LepperM.R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut Massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 (3), 577–585.
90.
VoakesP.S. (1997). Social influences on journalists' decision making in ethical decisions. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 12, (1) 18–35.
91.
WardS.J.A. (2006). The invention of journalism ethics: The path to objectivity and beyond.Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
92.
WeaverD.H.WilhoitG.C. (1996). The American journalist in the 1990s: U.S. news people at the end of an era.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
93.
WhiteH.A.PearceR.C. (1991). Validating an ethical motivations scale: Convergence and predictive ability. Journalism Quarterly, 68 (3), 455–464.
94.
WilkinsL.ColemanR. (2005). The moral media: How journalists reason about ethics.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
