The “Her Say” column of the “Womanews” section in the Chicago Tribune functioned as an editorial to position the new women's section and provide women-centered perspectives on issues. Written by women from outside the Tribune staff during its 1991 launch, “Her Say” spoke in voices drawn from the larger women's community, often harkening back to earlier notions of gender to bring forward concepts and rework them to fit American women in the 1990s. Using sex difference and privileging sisterhood, “Her Say” articulated the terms of a separate women's culture, the bounds of which continued to be defined by newspapers across the nation as they introduced their own women's sections. Through “Her Say” this section signaled a shift in the media paradigm from liberal feminism to a cultural feminist approach, which called for a reconnection among women through women's media in the media mainstream. The myth for the 1990s that emerged from “Her Say” was that of a world-weary prodigal daughter returning to the hearth. As the mouthpiece for the “Womanews” section, “Her Say” heralded a revaluing of “woman,” and challenged the industry to hasten its redefinition of “news” for 21st -century relevancy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlcoffL. (1997). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. In NicholsonL., The second wave: A reader in feminist theory. New York: Routledge.
2.
AustinB. (1991a, July 28). Protecting a fetus can imprison the mother. Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
3.
AustinB. (1991b October 6). Regarding your marriage, your honor… Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
4.
AustinB. (1991c December 1). A matter of tears, a matter of choice. Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
5.
BaehrH. (1981). The impact of feminism on media studies. In SpenderD., Men's studies modified. New York: Pergamon.
6.
BelafonteS. (1991 June 30). Black and white and fed up all over. Chicago Tribune: p. 11.
7.
BellowsL. G. (1991 June 2). Looking through law's glass ceiling. Chicago Tribune: p. 15.
8.
BerryB. (1991 November 3). Vision of black beauty shaded by colorism. Chicago Tribune: p. 15.
9.
BoxerM. J. (1982). For and about women. In KeohaneN. O.RosaloM. Z.GelpiB. C., Feminist Theory, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10.
BradleyP. (1998). Mass communication and the shaping of U.S. feminism. In CarterC.BranstonG.AllanS.News, gender and power. London and New York: Routledge.
11.
BraidottiR. (1991). The subject in feminism. Hypatia6(2): 155–172.
12.
BrownM. E.GardettoD. C. (2000). Representing Hillary Rodham Clinton. In ZoonenL. v.SrenbernyA., Gender, politics and communication. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
13.
ButlerJ. (1992). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” In ButlerJ.ScottJ. W., Feminists Theorise the Political. London: Routledge.
14.
ButlerM. (1975). Image of women in advertisements. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Institute for Communication Research.
15.
ButlerM.PaisleyW. (1980). Women and the mass media: Sourcebook for research and action. New York: Human Sciences Press.
16.
ByerlyC. (1999). News, feminism and the dialectics of gender relations. In MeyersM., Mediated Women. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
17.
CarterC.BranstonB.AllanS. (1998). Setting new(s) agendas: An introduction. In CarterC.BranstonB.AllanS., News, gender and power, London and New York: Routledge.
18.
CirksenaK. (1989). Women's liberation from spirals of silence. In RushR. R.AllenD., Communications at the crossroads: The gender gap connection. Norwood, N J: Ablex.
19.
CirksenaK.CuklanzL. (1992). Male is to female as ___ is to ___: A guided tour of five feminist frameworks for communication studies. In RakowL. F., Women making meaning: New feminist directions in communication, New York: Routledge.
20.
CottN. (1977). The bonds of womanhood: “Woman's sphere” in New England, 1780–1835. New Haven: Yale UP.
21.
CourtneyA. E.LockeretzS. W. (February 1971) Woman's place: An analysis of the roles portrayed by women in magazine advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 92–95.
22.
CourtneyA. E.WhippleT. W. (1983). Sex stereotypes in advertising. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
23.
CreedonP. J. (1993). Preface. In CreedonP. J., Women in Mass Communication. (2d ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
DervinB. (1987). The potential contribution of feminist scholarship to the field of communication. Journal of Communication, 37(4): 107–120.
25.
DonovanJ. (2000). Feminist theory: The intellectual traditions of American feminisms. (3rd ed.). New York: Continuum.
26.
DooleyB. (1991 September 1). Honor the workers, and honor their needs. Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
27.
DudgeonC. (1991 May 19). Stay-at-home mom and that's official. Chicago Tribune: p. 11.
28.
EcholsA. (1983). The new feminism of yin and yang. In SnitnowA.StansellC.ThompsonS., Powers of desire. New York: Monthly Review Press.
29.
EcholsA. (1984). The taming of the id: Feminist sexual politics, 1968–83. In VanceC. S., Pleasure and danger. Boston: Routledge.
30.
EhrenreichB. (1995). The silenced majority. In DinesG.HumezJ. M., Gender, race and class in media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
EhrenreichB.EnglishD. (1978). For her own good: 150 years of the experts' advice to women. New York: Doubleday.
32.
FaludiS. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown.
33.
FentonN. (2000). The problematics of postmodernism for feminist media studies. Media, Culture & Society, 22: 723-741.
34.
FitterF. (1991 May 5). Too often, fear is another form of rape. Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
35.
FloraC. B. (1971). The passive female: Her comparative image by class and culture in women's magazine fiction, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33: 435-444.
36.
FreemanJ. (1995). From suffrage to women's liberation. In FreemanJ., Women. (5th ed.), Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
37.
GoffmanE. (1976). Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.
38.
GravesK. W. (1991 August 18) Taking back the night – with gun in hand. Chicago Tribune: p. 11.
39.
GueninZ. B. (1975). Women's pages in American newspapers: Missing out on contemporary content. Journalism Quarterly, 52(1): 66–69.
40.
HawleyM. D. (1997). Is the “women's section” an anachronism? Affinity for and ambivalence about the Chicago Tribune's Womanews. Paper presented at the 80th annual convention of Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, 30 July–02 August, at Chicago.
41.
HenryS. (1993). Changing media history through women's history. In CreedonP. J., Women in Mass Communication. (2d ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
HermesJ. (1995). A perfect fit: Feminist media studies. In BuikemaR.SmelikA., Women's studies and culture: A feminist introduction. London: Zed.
43.
HorrisbergerL. (1997). Women on the front page of the Plain Dealer. Do woman's pages matter? Master's thesis. The University of Akron, Akron, OH.
IsraelB. (1993 October 3). Pages of their own? Rekindling the debate. New York Times: pp. 9:1, 9:9.
46.
JaddouL.WilliamsJ. (April 1981). A theoretical contribution to the struggle against the dominant representations of women. Media, Culture & Society3: 105-124. Journal of Communication Inquiry, (1987) 11(1).
47.
KamenP. (1991, August 11). Twentysomething, feminist and proud of it. Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
48.
KitchC. (1997). Changing theoretical perspectives on women's media images: The emergence of patterns in a new area of historical scholarship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(3): 477–489.
49.
KurianskyJ. (1991a June 23). Kennedy's silent code has unseen cost. Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
50.
KurianskyJ. (1991b September 15). It takes more than love to raise a love child. Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
51.
KurianskyJ. (1991c November 17). What rise in porn says about ‘good girls.’ Chicago Tribune: p. 15.
52.
LevinG. (28 July 1986). Adding sections to capture readers, advertisers. Advertising Age: S1-S2.
53.
LueckT. L.ChangH. (2002). Tribune's “WomanNews” gives voice to women's issues. Newspaper Research Journal, 23(1): 59–72.
54.
MadiganL. (1991 September 8). Too many suffer a ‘second rape’ by society. Chicago Tribune: p. 11.
55.
MalletE. (1992 March 24). A new section for the new woman. Cleveland Plain Dealer: p. D1.
56.
McGrathK. (1993). Women and newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 14(2): 95–110.
57.
MeyersJ. (1990 April 16). Papers re-invent women's section. Advertising Age: p. S7.
58.
MillerS. H. (Winter 1976). Changes in women's/lifestyle sections. Journalism Quarterly53: 641-647.
59.
MontanaD. (1991 July 14). Nude dance ruling strips adults' rights. Chicago Tribune: p. 11.
60.
O'DonnellW. J.O'DonnellK. J. (1978). Update: Sex-role messages in TV commercials. Journal of Communication, 28(1): 156–158.
61.
PandianH. (1999). Engendering communication policy: Key issues in the international women-and-media arena and obstacles to forging and enforcing policy. Media, Culture & Society21: 459-480.
62.
ParetskyS. (26 May 1991). We're paying for our own torment. Chicago Tribune: p. 11.
63.
PingreeS.HawkinsR. P.ButlerM.PaisleyW. (1976). A scale for sexism. Journal of Communication, 26(4): 193–200.
64.
PittsB. J.KumbalaS.PopovichM. N.ReedD. L. (1997). The process of media writing.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
65.
RakowL. F. (1986). Rethinking gender research in communication. Journal of Communication, 36(4): 11–26.
66.
RakowL. F. (1992). The field reconsidered. In RakowL. F., Women making meaning: New feminist directions in communication. New York: Routledge.
67.
RandleN. (1991 June 9). At last, a film worthy of the “F” word. Chicago Tribune: p. 15.
68.
RubinG. (1995). [1993] Misguided, dangerous and wrong. In DinesG.HumezJ. M., Gender, Race and Class in Media: A text reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
SandersM. (1991 April 28). Pregnant anchors adrift in a sea of stars. Chicago Tribune: p. 15.
70.
SchmidtK.CollinsC. (1993, July/August). Showdown at gender gap. American Journalism Review, 15: 39-42.
71.
SiegelC. (1991 September 29). Why we can't agree on comparable worth. Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
72.
SpivakG. (1992). French feminism revisited: Ethics and politics. In ButlerJ.ScottJ. W., Feminists theorise the political. London: Routledge.
73.
SteevesH. L. (1987). Feminist theories and media studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4(2): 95-135.
74.
StempelG. H.IIIHargroveT.BerntJ. P. (2000). Relation of growth of use of the Internet to changes in media use from 1995 to 1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1): 71–79.
75.
StreitmatterR. (Summer 1998). Transforming the women's pages: Strategies that worked. Journalism History, 24(2): 72–81.
76.
TongR. P. (1998). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction. (2d ed.), Boulder, CO: Westview.
77.
TuchmanG.DanielsA. K.BenetJ.1978. Hearth and home: Images of women in the mass media. New York: Free Press.
78.
WeldonM. (1991a June 16). Exploding the new father myth. Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
79.
WeldonM. (1991b December 8). A new script for the Magic show. Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
80.
WeldonM. (1991 October 13). Quest for biological child can go too far. Chicago Tribune: p. 13.
81.
WeldonM. (1991d December 29). The year of the lies. Chicago Tribune: p. 11.
82.
WelterB. (1966). The cult of true womanhood, 1820–1860. American Quarterly, 18: 151-174.
83.
Women's Institute for Freedom of the Press. (Spring 1993a). Newspaper gender gap widening, says Newspaper Association of America. Media Report to Women: p. 4.
84.
Women's Institute for Freedom of the Press. (Spring 1993b). Update: Newspaper women's sections continue to draw interest, debate. Media Report to Women: p. 5.
85.
WhittJ. (1997). Regression or progression? The Chicago Tribune and “Womanews.” In BiagiS.Kern-FoxworthM., Facing difference: Race, gender and mass media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
86.
ZoonenL. v. (1994). Feminist media studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87.
ZoonenL. v. (1996). Feminist perspectives on the media. In CurranJ.GurevitchM., Mass media and society (2d ed). London: Arnold.
