This monograph focuses on perceptions of televised global beauty pageants among business and media professionals in India who organized, sponsored, and supported the Miss World beauty contest. The 1996 Miss World pageant, which was held in Bangalore, a cosmopolitan city in South India, proved to be highly controversial due to protests expressed against the pageant by religious leaders, conservative women's groups, feminist activists, and political parties. My analysis of discourses on Miss World that circulated among professionals in the Indian culture industry is based on data gathered from ethnographic fieldwork in Mumbai and Bangalore. Informants' statements about the televised Miss World revealed that categories of nation and gender deeply influenced local producers' interpretations of the benefits that accrue to India through the practice of hosting global media events. In selecting a logo for Miss World, organizers and sponsors had to carefully negotiate local religious and gender politics as well as global fashion and beauty standards. Organizers' motives in holding the pageant in India demonstrated the launching of new configurations of global cultural flows that highlight Third World culture industries' desires to manage and control their own projects of globalization. The study shows that the selection of a venue for Miss World was shaped by struggles to challenge regional hierarchies within India. In conclusion, I consider the implications of this qualitative research on local producers' interpretations of Miss World for studies of media globalization, nationalism, and gender.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABCL. (1996, August–September). Are you global?The India Magazine, 8.
2.
AbrahamA.JayaramS. (1996). The artist and the nation. Voices: A Journal on Communication for Development, 4 (3), 48–51.
3.
Abu-LughodJ. (1997). Going beyond global babble. In KingA. (Ed.), Culture, globalization, and the world system (pp. 131–137). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
Abu-LugodL. (1993). Writing women's worlds. Berkeley, CA: Univerity of California Press.
5.
AlterJ. (1992). The wrestler's body: Identity & ideology in North India. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6.
AnandS. (1994, December 18). Aishwarya vs. Sushmita. Deccan Herald, p. 7.
7.
AngI. (1996). Living room wars: Rethinking media audiences for a postmodern world. London: Routledge.
8.
AppaduraiA. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global economy. In FeatherstoneM. (Ed.). Global culture: Nationalism, globalization, and modernity (pp. 295–310). London: Sage Publications.
9.
AppaduraiA.BreckenridgeC. (1995). Public modernity in India. In BreckenridgeC. (Ed.). Consuming modernity: Public culture in a South Asian world (pp. 1–20). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
AppaduraiA. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
Banet-WeiserS. (1999). The most beautiful girl in the world: Beauty pageants & national identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12.
BarberB. R. (1992). Jihad vs. McWorld. The Atlantic, 269, p. 3.
13.
BasuA. (1996). Caste and class: The rise of Hindu nationalism in India. Harvard International Review (Summer), 28–31.
14.
BasuT.DattaP.SarkarS.SarkarTSenS. (1993). Khakhi shorts, saffron flags: Tracts for the times. New Delhi: Orient Longman Ltd.
15.
BavadamL. (1994, December 4–10). Beauty and the East. Sunday magazine, 52–91.
16.
CallahanW. (1998). The ideology of Miss Thailand in national, consumerist, and transnational space. Alternatives, 23, 29–61.
17.
ChatterjeeP. (1989). Colonialism, nationalism, and the colonialized women: The contest in India. American Ethnologist, 16, 622–633.
18.
ChopraA.BariaF. (1996, November 14). The beauty craze. India Today, 45–48.
19.
CohenC.WilkR.StoeltjeB. (Eds.). (1996.). Beauty queens on the global stage: Gender, contests, and power. New York: Routledge.
20.
DayanD.KatzE. (1992). Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
21.
DerneS. (1999). Film-going builds self, sexuality, and power: An ethnography of men's reception of popular films in India. New York: Greenwood Press.
22.
DuttA. K. (1997). Uncertain success: The political economy of Indian economic reform. Journal of International Affairs, 51 (1), 57–84.
23.
FoucaultM. (1979). Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage Books.
24.
GiddensA. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
Godrej Soaps, Lower sales and profits. (1997, October 25). Economic and Political Weekly, 2780.
26.
GrewalI. (1999). Traveling Barbie: Indian transnationality and new consumer subjects. Positions, 7 (3), 799–824.
27.
GuptaN. (1998). Switching channels: Ideologies of television in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
28.
GuptaS. P. (1993). Liberalisation: Its impact on the Indian economy. New Delhi: Macmillan India Limited.
29.
HannerzU. (1997). Scenarios for peripheral cultures. In KingA. (Ed.), Culture, globalization, and the world system (pp. 107–128). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
Indian sights: Report on cosmetics industry. (1995, July 1995). Soap, Perfumery, and Cosmetics, 5.
31.
JayawardenaK. (1986). Feminism and nationalism in the Third World. London: Zed Books.
32.
JhaR. K. (1996, November 11). We want—sorry need—our Miss World. Indian Express, p. 8.
33.
JosephA. (1995, February 5). Beauty Contests in India. Deccan Herald Sunday Magazine, p. 1.
34.
KandiyotiD. (1991). Identity and its discontents: Women and the nation. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 20, 429–43.
35.
KalifaL.PezzaniN. (1999, Fall/Winter). Welcome from the Organisers of Miss Addis Ababa 1999. Saba, 7.
36.
KatrakK. (1989). Decolonizing culture: Toward a theory for postcolonial women's texts. Modern Fiction Studies, 35 (1), 157–179.
37.
KrishnanP.DigheA. (1990). Affirmation and denial: Construction of femininity on Indian television. New Delhi: Sage.
38.
LindlofT. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
39.
ManiL. (1991). Cultural theory and colonial texts: Reading eyewitness accounts of widow burning. In GrossbergL.NelsonC.TreichlerP. (Eds.), Cultural Studies (pp. 392–408). New York: Routledge.
40.
MankekarP. (1997). To whom does Ameena belong?: Toward a feminist analysis of childhood and nationhood in contemporary India. Feminist Review, (Summer), 26–60.
41.
MankekarP. (1999). Screening culture, viewing politics: An ethnography of television, womanhood, and nation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
42.
Mega events. (1996, November 7–21). Business Today, 30–31.
43.
MenezesS. (1998, July 20). The fading of an icon. Outlook, 60–66.
44.
MenonP. (1996, December 13). Pageant and protests. Frontline, 4–18.
45.
MisraK.RoychowduryD. (1997). Vigilantes, Virgins, and long-suffering wives: The limitations of contemporary Indian television's reconstructions of femininity. Contemporary South Asia, 6 (3), 247–258.
46.
MitraA. (1994). Television and popular culture in India. New Delhi: Sage.
47.
MarketerMr. (1996, December 6). Business Today, p. 8.
48.
MukerjeaD.N.ShekarM.RadhakishnaG.S.SenS.DhawanR. (1998, July 22). Seductive South. Business World, 18–25.
49.
MunshiS. (1998). Wife/mother/daughter: Multiple avatars of homemaker in 1990s Indian advertising. Media, Culture, and Society, 20 (4), 573–591.
50.
NandyA.TrivedyS.MayaramS.YagnikA. (1995). Creating a nationality: The Ramajanmabhumi movement and fear of the self. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
51.
NinanS. (1995). Through the magic window: Television and change in India. New Delhi: Penguin Books India.
52.
NordenstrengK.ManetEnriqueKleinwatcherW. (1986). New World Information and Communication Order: Sourcebook. Prague, Czechoslovakia: International Organization of Journalists.
53.
OngA. (1987). Spirits of resistance and capitalist discipline: Factory women in Malaysia. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
54.
PanagariyaA. (1999). Trade policy in South Asia: Recent liberalisation and future agenda. The World Economy, 22 (3), 353–378.
55.
ParasharR. (1996, October 27). Colonial ambience, Indian warmth, Economic Times, p. 2.
56.
PariharRRavalS. (1996, November 15). The business of beauty. India Today, 50–54.
57.
PowerC.MazumdarS. (2000, February 28). Bollywood goes global [12 paragraphs]. Neivsweeic.com [Online magazine].
58.
RajagopalA. (1996). Mediating modernity: Theorizing reception in a non-Western society. The Communication Review, 1, 441–470.
59.
RajagoplanS. (1996, October 15). Storm in an empty cup. Indian Express, p. 11.
60.
Reuters (1996, November 24). 1 crown, 1,500 arrests at Miss World pageant. Chicago Tribune, p. 14.
61.
RobertsonR. (1994). Globalization or glocalization. The Journal of International Communication, 1 (1), 33–52.
62.
RootH. (1998). A liberal India: The triumph of hope over experience. Asian Survey, 38 (5), 510–534.
63.
SanghviV. (1999, April 18). Amitabh Bachchan unleashed. Graphiti: The Telegraph Magazine, pp. 6–15.
64.
SetalwadT. (1996). The politics of the Sangh Parivar: Playing the Hindutva Card. Voices: A Journal on Communication for Development, 4 (3), 23–25.
65.
ScottC. (1996). Sushmita and Aishwarya: Symbols of national pride?Voices: A Journal on Communication for Development, 4 (3), 16–18.
66.
ShenonP. (1991, August 21). Where beauty queens preen, no eyesores please. The New York Times, p. 4.
67.
ShomeR. (1996). Race and popular cinema: The rhetorical strategies of whiteness inCity of Joy. Communication Quarterly, 44 (4), 502–518.
68.
SinhaM. (1995). Colonial masculinity: The ‘manly Englishman’ and the ‘effeminate Bengali’ in the late nineteenth century. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
69.
SitaramanS. (1996). The other side of the story. Unpublished manuscript. Indian Social and Economic Council, Bangalore, India.
70.
Sreberny-MohammadiA. (1991). The global and the local in international communications. In CurranJ.GurevitchM. (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 118–138). London: Edward Arnold.
71.
SrinivasS. (1999). Hot bodies and cooing substances: Rituals of sport in a science city. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 23 (1), 24–40.
72.
StoeltjeB. (1996). The snake charmer queen. In CohenC.WilkR.StoeltjeB. (Eds.), Beauty queens on the global stage: Gender, contests, and power, (pp. 13–29). New York: Routledge.
73.
SubramanianD. (1998, April 6). Key product categories bloom in liberalized Indian economy. Marketing Magazine, 6.
74.
Sunder RajanR. (1993). Real & imagined women: Gender, culture, and postcolonialism. New York: Routledge.
75.
SuraiyaJ. (1994, December 5). Not just skin deep: The symbolic value of Sen and Rai. The Times of India, p. 8.
76.
TejpalT. (1998, July 20). The mirror has two faces. Outlook, 60–66.
77.
ThomaP. (1999). Of beauty pageants and Barbie: Theorizing consumption in Asian-American transnational feminism. Genders, 29. [Online journal],.
78.
TomlinsonJ. (1996). Cultural globalization and cultural imperialism. In Sreberny-MohammadiA. (Ed.), International communication and globalization (pp. 170–190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79.
Tzu-Chun WuJ. (1997). “Loveliest daughter of our ancient Cathay!“: Representations of ethnic and gender identity in the Miss Chinatown U.S. A beauty pageant. Journal of Social History, 28, 5–31.
80.
VarmaP. (1998). The great Indian middle-class. New Delhi, India: Viking Penguin India.
81.
ZaveriS. (1996, November 15). Mum's the world. Indian Express, p. 6.
