Regression-based retention models produce excellent predicted student outcomes to alert campus faculty and staff to potential retention risks. However, models using decision tree classification allow stakeholders to see how retention breaks down for categories of students in their domains. We implemented logistic regression modeling for freshmen over four years and saw success in identifying students for interventions, but quickly after implementing decision tree classification models, we were able to engage retention stakeholders (admissions, coaches, academic units) and gather qualitative data on how to best tailor interventions in future years. A complementary approach of using both types of models is recommended.
BatainehA.HajjajR.AbdohH. B.FataftahF. (2025, April). An empirical study on adaptive learning using decision trees for student performance prediction. In 2025 1st International Conference on Computational Intelligence Approaches and Applications (ICCIAA) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIAA65327.2025.11013444
2.
CardonaT.CudneyE. A.HoerlR.SnyderJ. (2023). Data mining and machine learning retention models in higher education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 25(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025120964920
3.
ColemanB.BeasyK.MorrisonR.MainsbridgeC. (2024). Academics’ perspectives on a student engagement and retention program: Dilemmas and deficit discourses. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(2), 518–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.2000387
De SilvaL. M. H.ChountaI. A.Rodríguez-TrianaM. J.RoaE. R.GrambergA.ValkA. (2022). Toward an institutional analytics agenda for addressing student dropout in higher education: An academic stakeholders’ perspective. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7507
6.
DelenD. (2011). Predicting student attrition with data mining methods. Journal of College Student Retention: Research Theory & Practice, 13(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.13.1.b
7.
DelenD.DavazdahemamiB.Rasouli DezfouliE. (2024). Predicting and mitigating freshmen student attrition: A local-explainable machine learning framework. Information Systems Frontiers: A Journal of Research and Innovation, 26, 641–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10397-3
8.
FischerC.PardosZ. A.BakerR. S.WilliamsJ. J.SmythP.YuR.SlaterS.BakerR.WarschauerM. (2020). Mining big data in education: Affordances and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 130–160. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903304
9.
FrazierA.SilvaJ.MeilakR.SahooI.BrodaM.ChanD. (2023). Decision tree-based predictive models for academic achievement using college students’ support networks. Journal of Data Science, 21(3), 557–577. https://doi.org/10.6339/21-JDS1033
10.
HigginbothamK. (2022). How first-generation college students find success: Reflections, strategies, and recommendations on what colleges can do to increase retention among low-income students. Journal of Postsecondary Student Success, 2(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.33009/fsop_jpss131269
11.
HocaS.DimililerN. (2025). A machine learning framework for student retention policy development: A case study. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 2989. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062989
12.
HoytJ. E. (2023). Student connections: The critical role of student affairs and academic support services in retention efforts. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 25(3), 480–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025121991502
13.
KirbyL. A. J.ThomasC. L. (2021). High-impact teaching practices foster a greater sense of belonging in the college classroom. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(3), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1950659
14.
KondoN.OkuboM.HatanakaT. (2017, July). Early detection of at-risk students using machine learning based on LMS log data. In 2017 6th IIAI international congress on advanced applied informatics (IIAI-AAI) (pp. 198–201). IEEE.
15.
MatzS. C.BukowC. S.PetersH.DeaconsC.DinuA.StachlC. (2023). Using machine learning to predict student retention from socio-demographic characteristics and app-based engagement metrics. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 5705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32484-w
16.
Ortiz-LozanoJ. M.Rua-VieitesA.Bilbao-CalabuigP.Casadesús-FaM. (2018). University student retention: Best time and data to identify undergraduate students at risk of dropout. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1502090
17.
RojasÓACMontoyaE. M. H.ConteroM. (2023). Application of a predictive model created with deep learning to increase student retention: A comparative study. INTED2023 Proceedings, 1(March), 553–560. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2023.0196
18.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), Fall Enrollment component, selected years, Spring 2013 through Spring 2022 (final data) and Spring 2023 (provisional data); IPEDS, Institutional Characteristics component, selected years, Fall 2012 through Fall 2022 (final data); and IPEDS, Admissions component, Winter 2021-22 and Winter 2022-23 (final data). (December 2024). Retrieved on November 20, 2025. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_326.30.asp
19.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), Spring 2008 through Spring 2021, Fall Enrollment component; and IPEDS Fall 2006 through Fall 2019, Institutional Characteristics component. (November 2021). Retrieved on November 20, 2025. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_326.30.asp
20.
WeathertonM.KoM. E.NicholsE. L.KrishnanS.FaberC. (2024). All in: Understanding and motivating stakeholders to create an equitable culture of student success. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 23(4), es10:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-02-0065
