The goals of this study were to understand whether foundational or complex literacy skills predict performance in the course and subsequent early college success. The course emphasizes the preparation of students’ readiness to strategically and contextually engage in discipline-specific courses and practices. Students in a reading and study strategies course were administered assessments of proficiencies in the foundational skills of reading and complex literacy skills. The findings suggest that complex literacy skills, such as those foregrounded in this course, correlated with student success (as measured by the cumulative GPA) for the subsequent three semesters. A major implication of this study is that successful college reading requires the ability to engage in complex, strategic, and contextualized tasks appropriate to the specific reading tasks at hand. Colleges may benefit from providing these spaces and structures for students to learn these contextualized literacy skills.
AlexanderP. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032008010
AlfassiM. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.4.171-185
4.
AriO. (2016). Word recognition processes in college-age students’ reading comprehension achievement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(8), 718–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2015.1098578
5.
ArmstrongS. L.StahlN. A.KantnerM. J. (2015). Investigating academic literacy expectations: A curriculum audit model for college text readiness. Journal of Developmental Education, 38(2), 2–4, 6, 8–9, 12–13, 23.
6.
Armstrong, S. L., Reynolds, R. (2011). An authentically simulated approach to disciplinary literacy instruction in a study strategies course. NADE Digest, 5(2), 1–9
7.
Armstrong, S. L., & Stahl, N. A. (2017). Communication across the silos and borders: The culture of reading in a community college. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 47(2), 99-122.
8.
Armstrong, S. L., Stahl, N. A., & Kantner, M. J. (2016). Building better bridges: Understanding academic text readiness at one community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(11), 1–24.
BoylanH. R.TrawickA. R. (2015). Contemporary developmental education: Maybe it's not as bad as it looks. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 31(2), 26–37.
11.
BrittM. A.RouetJ. F.DurikA. M. (2018). Literacy beyond text comprehension: A theory of purposeful reading. Routledge.
12.
CopelandC. T.RideoutH. M. (1901). Freshman English and theme-correcting in Harvard College. Silver, Burdett and Company.
13.
CormierM. S.BickerstaffS. (2020). How can we improve teaching in higher education? Learning from CUNY Start. CCRC Working Paper No. 120.
14.
CromleyJ. G.AzevedoR. (2007). Testing and refinding the direct and inferential models of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
15.
CromleyJ. G.AzevedoR. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential models of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325.
16.
Department of Education (2021).
17.
Feller, D. P., Magliano, J. P., Sabatini, J., O'Reilly, T., & Kopatich, R. D. (2020). Relations between component reading skills, inferences, and comprehension performance in community college readers. Discourse Processes, 473–490.
FreebodyP.LukeA. (1990). ‘Literacies’ programs: Debates and demands. Prospect: Australian Journal of TESOL, 5(7), 7–16.
20.
GeeJ. P. (2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(8), 714–725. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.44.8.3
21.
GoldmanS. M.BrittA.BrownW.CribbG.GeorgeM.GreenleafC.LeeC. D.ShanahanC., & Project READI. (2016) Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy, Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
GutiérrezK. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
24.
Higgs, K., Santuzzi, A., Gibson, C., Kopatich, R. J., Feller, D. P., & Magliano, J. P. (2023). Relationships between task awareness, strategy use and literacy outcome. Frontiers in Educational Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsgy.2023.1056457
25.
HolschuhJ. P. (2014). The Common Core goes to college: The potential for disciplinary literacy approaches in developmental literacy classes. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 45(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2014.950876
26.
HolschuhJ. P.LampiJ. P. (2018). Comprehension. In FlilppoR. F. & BeanT. W. (Eds.), Handbook of College Reading and Study Strategy Research (3rd ed., pp. 118–142). Routledge.
27.
HughesK. L.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2011). Assessing developmental assessment in community colleges. Community College Review, 39(4), 327–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/009552111426898
28.
Kaldes, G., Higgs, K., Santuzzi, A., Tonks, S. M., Lampi, J. P., O'Reilly, T., Sabatini, J., & Magliano, J. P. (2023). Testing of the model of a proficient academic reader (PAR) in a postsecondary context. An unpublished manuscript.
29.
KucerS. B. (2014). Dimensions of literacy: A conceptual base for teaching reading and writing in school settings. Routledge.
Lampi, J. P., Holschuh, J. P., Reynolds, T., & Rush, L. S. (2019). Using disciplinary literacy approaches for reading literary texts in developmental literacy courses. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 49(3), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2019.1631231
32.
MaglianoJ. P.LampiJ. P., & RayM. (2020). Revealing the comprehensionprocesses of underprepared college students: An evaluation of the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool. Journal of College Literacy and Learning, 46(1), 104–122.
33.
Magliano, J. P., Lampi, J. P., Ray, M., & Chan, G. (2020). Revealing the comprehension processes of underprepared college students: An evaluation of the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool. Journal of College Literacy and Learning, 46(1), 104–122.
34.
Magliano, J. P., Talwar, A., Feller, D. P., Wang, Z., O'Reilly, T., & Sabatini, J. (2023). Exploring thresholds in the foundational skills for reading and comprehension outcomes in the context of postsecondary readers. Journal of Learning Disorders, 56, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221087
MorrisC. D.BransfordJ. D.FranksJ. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16(5), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9
37.
National Center for Education Statistics (2019). Highlights of the 2017 U.S. PIAAC results web report (NCES 2020-777). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/piaac/ current_results.asp
38.
NistS. L.SimpsonM. L. (2000). College studying. In KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 645–666). Elarbaum.
39.
O’ReillyT.SabatiniJ. (2013). Reading for understanding: How performance moderators and scenarios impact assessment design (ETS Research Report Series RR-15-17). ETS. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02338.x
40.
O’ReillyT.WeeksJ.SabatiniJ.HaldermanL.SteinbergJ. (2014). Designing reading comprehension assessments for reading interventions: How a theoretically motivated assessment can serve as an outcome measure. Educational Psychology Review, 26(3), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9269-z
ParisS. G.ByrnesJ. P.ParisA. H. (2001). Constructing theories, identities, and actions of self-regulated learners. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 253–287). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
ParkS. W.SperlingR. A. (2012). Academic procrastinators and their self-regulation. Psychology (Savannah, Ga ), 3(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.31003
PerkinsD. N.SalomonG. (1988). Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, 46(1), 22–32.
47.
PintrichP. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3
48.
PressleyM. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545–563). Erlbaum.
49.
ReasonR. D. (2009). An examination of persistence research through the lens of a comprehensive conceptual framework. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0098
50.
RenickT. M. (2020). Predictive analytics, academic advising, early alerts, and student success. In WebberK. L.ZhengH. Y. (Eds.), Big data on campus: Data analytics and decision making in higher education (pp. 177–197). Johns Hopkins University Press.
51.
RouetJ.-F. (2006). The skills of document use: from text comprehension to Web-based learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
SabatiniJ.O’ReillyT.WeeksJ.WangZ. (2020). Engineering a 21st century reading comprehension assessment system utilizing scenario-based assessment techniques. International Journal of Testing, 20(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2018.1551224
54.
SabatiniJ.WeeksJ.O’ReillyT.BruceK.SteinbergJ.ChaoZ. (2019). SARA reading components tests, RISE forms: Technical adequacy and test design, 3rd edition (ETS Research Report Series). https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12269
SimpsonM. L.NistS. L. (1997). Perspectives on learning history: A case study. Journal of Literacy Research, 29(3), 363–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969709547965
57.
SimpsonM. L.NistS. L. (2000). An update on strategic learning: It’s more than textbook reading strategies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult LIteracy, 43(6), 528–541.
58.
SimpsonM. L.RushL. (2003). College students’ beliefs, strategy employment, transfer, and academic performance: An examination across three academic disciplines. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2003.10850145
59.
Talwar, A., Greenberg, D., & Li, H. (2020). Identifying profiles of struggling adult readers: Relative strengths and weaknesses in lower-level and higher-level competencies. Reading and Writing, 33, 2155–2171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10038-0
60.
SimpsonM. L.StahlN. A.FrancisM. A. (2004). Reading and learning strategies: Recommendations for the 21st century. Journey of Developmental Education, 28(2), 2–4, 6, 8, 10-12, 14–15, 32.
61.
SnowC. (2002). Reading for understanding. Toward and R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.
62.
SperlingR. A.HowardB. C.StaleyR.DuBoisN. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.10.2.117.27905
63.
StahlN.KingJ. R. (2018). History. In FlippoR. F.BeanT. W. (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (3rd ed., pp. 3–26). Routledge.
TalwarA.MaglianoJ. P.HiggsK.SantuzziA.TonksS.O’reillyT.SabatiniJ. (2023). Early academic success in college: Examining the contributions of reading literacy skills, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading motivation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 53(1), 58–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2022.2137069
66.
TarabanR.RynearsonK.KerrM. (2000). College students’ academic performance and self-reports of comprehension strategy use. Reading Psychology, 21(4), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/027027100750061930
67.
TriggsF. O. (1943). Remedial reading: The diagnosis and correction of reading difficulties at the college level. University of Minnesota Press.
68.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes(Ed. and trans. M. Cole, V. John Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman). Harvard University Press.
69.
WeathertonM.SchusterE. E. (2021). Success for all? A call to re-examine how student success is defined in higher education. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-09-0223
70.
WeinsteinC. E.HusmanJ.DierkingD. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulated learning (pp. 728–749). Academic.
71.
WineburgS.ReismanA. (2015). Disciplinary literacy in history. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(8), 636–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.410
72.
WittrockM. C. (1986). Students’ thought processes. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 2970314). Macmillan.
