Many students across the country experienced a decline in academic performance due to COVID-19. As a result, college readiness measures have fallen short, especially in math. This lack of preparation frequently leads to additional teaching, wasting important class time by going over the prerequisite content again instead of using it to study new topics in greater depth. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of a recitation laboratory for precalculus students in bridging the conceptual gap, strengthening the concepts, eradicating any misunderstandings, and eventually improving student performance. The results demonstrated that the adopted intervention significantly improved student performance and helped students close conceptual gaps in precalculus, thereby reducing the level of attrition from their majors and university.
AdebolaO. O. (2021). Supplemental instruction as a tool for students’ academic performance in higher education. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 4(2), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2021.4
BowersJ.SmithW.RenL.HannaR. (2019). Integrating active learning labs in precalculus: Measuring the value added. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2017.1375355
4.
BrionesS. K. F.DagamacR. J. R.DavidJ. D.LanderioC. A. B. (2021). Factors affecting the students’ scholastic performance: A survey study. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 2(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v2i2.41394
5.
ChampionJ.MesaV. (2018). Pathways to calculus in U.S. high schools. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 28(6), 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1315473
6.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555
ErebholoF.Ero-TolliverI. (2021). Students’ perception of barriers and opportunities for STEM research: A study of freshmen students at an HBCU. In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Southeastern Section Annual Conference, Virtual.https://sites.asee.org/se/wp-content/uploads/sites/56/2021/04/2021ASEESE68.pdf
9.
FosheeC. M.ElliottS. N.AtkinsonR. K. (2016). Technology enhanced learning in college mathematics remediation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12285
10.
FreemanS.EddyS. L.McDonoughM.SmithM. K.OkoroaforN.JordtH.WenderothM. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences – PNAS, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
KuhfeldM.TarasawaB. (2020). The COVID-19 slide: What summer learning loss can tell us about the potential impact of school closures on student academic achievement. Collaborative for Student Growth, NWEA Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed609141
14.
LiuM.McKelroyE.CorlissS. B.CarriganJ. (2017). Investigating the effect of an adaptive learning intervention on students’ learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1605–1625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9542-1
15.
MangoldN.ShimaK.YangJ. (2021). Long-term impact of supplemental instruction in improving student performance in intermediate accounting courses. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 25(3), 1–15. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2543521236?pq-origsite=summon
NingH. K.DowningK. (2010). The impact of supplemental instruction on learning competence and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 35(8), 921–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903390786
OtekunrinO. A.OniL. O.OtekunrinO. A. (2017). Challenges, attitudes and academic performance of agricultural science students in public secondary schools of Ibadan North, Nigeria. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2017/31216
20.
PeraltaY.KohliN.StromA.DuranczykI.MesaV.WatkinsL. (2020). A psychometric analysis of the algebra and precalculus concept readiness assessment for community colleges. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282919846019
21.
PeterfreundA. R.RathK. A.XenosS. P.BaylissF. (2008). The impact of supplemental instruction on students in stem courses: Results from San Francisco state university. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9(4), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.9.4.e
22.
PetrucciC. J.Rivera-FigueroaA. M. (2021). Student participation in supplemental instruction in STEM courses at a large urban community college in California. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 45(7), 498–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2020.1724575
23.
PyzdrowskiL. J.SunY.CurtisR.MillerD.WinnG.HenselR. A. (2013). Readiness and attitudes as indicators for success in college calculus. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9352-1
StevensE. A.RodgersM. A.PowellS. R. (2018). Mathematics interventions for upper elementary and secondary students: A meta-analysis of research. Remedial and Special Education, 39(6), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517731887
26.
TheobaldE. J.HillM. J.TranE.AgrawalS.ArroyoE. N.BehlingS.ChambweN.CintrónD. L.CooperJ. D.DunsterG.GrummerJ. A.HennesseyK.HsiaoJ.IranonN.JonesL.JordtH.KellerM.LaceyM. E.LittlefieldC. E.FreemanS. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
WebelC.KrupaE. E.McManusJ. (2017). The math emporium: Effective for whom, and for what? International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(2), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0046-x
