Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Community colleges have long been touted as a pathway to increase social mobility through their transfer function, yet this promise has not always been realized. This study uses the lens of community cultural wealth, particularly the concepts of aspirational, social, and navigational capitals, to understand vertical transfer students’ experiences and outcomes during the pandemic. Longitudinal interviews were conducted with 27 students over a four-year period as they moved through the transfer pathway in STEM majors. Students who transferred to a university immediately prior to or during the pandemic experienced greater academic and navigational challenges and reported diminished access to social capital. Students employed multiple, informal navigational strategies and drew on social networks, when possible, to maintain their academic progress. Findings also reveal the importance of the transfer-receiving department, especially access to supportive institutional agents, in sustaining STEM transfer students’ progress during COVID-19.

Keywords

transfer qualitative longitudinal STEM education COVID-19

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahn

Dominguez-Villegas

(2022). A change of plans: How the pandemic affected students of color and their plans for higher education. UCLA Latino Policy & Politics Initiative. https://latino.ucla.edu/research/fact-sheet-education-covid/

Aucejo

E. M.

French

J. F.

Ugalde Araya

M. P.

Zafar

(2020). The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: Evidence from a survey. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104271

Bacon

Packard

B. W. L.

(2018). Supporting the transition of community college transfer students into STEM at a four-year institution. Understanding Interventions, 9(2), 1–33. https://www.understandinginterventionsjournal.org/article/6354-supporting-the-transition-of-community-college-transfer-students-into-stem-at-a-four-year-institution

Bahr

P. R.

Jackson

McNaughtan

Oster

Gross

(2017). Unrealized potential: Community college pathways to STEM baccalaureate degrees. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(3), 430–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257313

Bensimon

E. M.

Dowd

A. C.

Stanton-Salazar

Dávila

B. A.

(2019). The role of institutional agents in providing institutional support to Latinx students in STEM. The Review of Higher Education, 42(4), 1689–1721. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0080

Bourdieu

(1997). The forms of capital. In Halsey

A. H.

Lauder

Brown

(Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, society (pp. 46–58). Oxford University Press.

Corwin

L. A.

Morton

T. R.

Demetriou

Panter

A. T.

(2020). A qualitative investigation of STEM students’ switch to non-STEM majors post-transfer. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 26(3), 263–301. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020027736

Crisp

Nuñez

A. M.

(2014). Understanding the racial transfer gap: Modeling underrepresented minority and nonminority students’ pathways from two-to four-year institutions. The Review of Higher Education, 37(3), 291–320. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2014.0017

Dinh

T. V.

Zhang

Y. L.

(2021). Engagement in high-impact practices and its influence on community college transfers’ STEM degree attainment. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 45(11), 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2020.1824133

10.

Dowd

A. C.

Pak

J. H.

Bensimon

E. M.

(2013). The role of institutional agents in promoting transfer access. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 21, 1–40. https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/1187/1067

11.

Elliott

D. C.

Lakin

J. M.

(2020). Running the STEM gauntlet: The complicity of four-year universities in the transfer penalty. Research in Higher Education, 61(4), 540–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09586-4

12.

Fontana

Frey

J. H.

(2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2(6), 645–672.

13.

Garcia

Cifuentes

(2020). Spring 2020 COVID-19 survey results. University of California, Davis: California Student Aid Commission. https://www.csac.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/spring_2020_covid19_student_survey_results_presentation.pdf?1594172639

14.

Goldrick-Rab

(2020). #RealCollege during the pandemic: Preview of fall 2020 survey findings. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, The Hope Center for College, Community and Justice. https://hope4college.com/rc2021-bni-during-the-ongoing-pandemic/

15.

Harper

Thiry

(2022). Advising from community college to university: What it takes for underrepresented transfer students in STEM to succeed. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2022.2050842

16.

Holland Zahner

D. G.

(2022). Opening the black box of vertical transfer admission: The experiences of community college students in STEM majors. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2022.2135041

17.

Holland Zahner

Harper

(2022). Validation of belonging among underrepresented undergraduates in STEM majors: Comparison of former transfer and non-transfer students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251221146119

18.

Horn

Skomsvold

(2011). Community college student outcomes: 1994–2009 (NCES 2012-253). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2012253

19.

Jackson

(2017). Developing pre-professional identity in undergraduates through work-integrated learning. Higher Education, 74(5), 833–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0080-2

20.

Jackson

D. L.

Laanan

F. S.

(2015). Desiring to fit: Fostering the success of community college transfer students in STEM. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2012.762565

21.

Jenkins

P. D.

Fink

(2016). Tracking transfer: New measures of institutional and state effectiveness in helping community college students attain bachelor’s degrees. New York: Community College Research Center. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/tracking-transfer-institutional-state-effectiveness.html

22.

Khazanchi

Evans

C. T.

Marcelin

J. R.

(2020). Racism, not race, drives inequity across the COVID-19 continuum. JAMA Network Open, 3(9), e2019933. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19933

23.

Kruse

Starobin

S. S.

Chen

Baul

Santos Laanan

(2015). Impacts of intersection between social capital and finances on community college students’ pursuit of STEM degrees. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(4), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2014.981893

24.

Laster Pirtle

W. N.

(2020). COVID-19 Racial capitalism: A fundamental cause of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic inequities in the United States. Health Education & Behavior, 47(4), 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120922942

25.

Lopez

Jones

S. J.

(2017). Examination of factors that predict academic adjustment and success of community college transfer students in STEM at 4-year institutions. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(3), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1168328

26.

Malcolm

Feder

(2016). Barriers and opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic change to support students’ diverse pathways. Washington DC: National Academies Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/21739/barriers-and-opportunities-for-2-year-and-4-year-stem-degrees

27.

Manier

Veague

York

T. T.

Wagstaff

Carinci

(2022). Lessons learned during COVID-19: Strategies transforming the future of STEM education. American Association for the Advancement of Science - Improving Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative. https://aaas-iuse.org/lessons-learned-report

28.

Myers

Starobin

S. S.

Chen

Baul

Kollasch

(2015). Predicting community college student’s intention to transfer and major in STEM: Does student engagement matter? Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(4), 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2014.981896

29.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2021). Undergraduate and graduate STEM students’ experiences during COVID-19: Proceedings of a virtual workshop series. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26024

30.

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). (2021). The increasing role of community colleges among bachelor’s degree recipients: Findings from the 2019 National Survey of College Graduates. NSF 21-309. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21309/national-center-for-science-and-engineering-statistics-2021

31.

National Student Clearinghouse Research Center (NSCRC). (2022). COVID-19: Transfer, mobility and progress. https://nscresearchcenter.org/transfer-mobility-and-progress/

32.

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2021). The pandemic and student engagement: Trends, disparities and opportunities. University of Indiana. https://nsse.indiana.edu/research/annual-results/2021/story1.html

33.

Ogilvie

A. M.

Knight

D. B.

(2021). Post-transfer transition experiences for engineering transfer students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(2), 292–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025118820501

34.

Packard

B. W. L.

Gagnon

J. L.

LaBelle

Jeffers

Lynn

(2011). Women’s experiences in the STEM community college transfer pathway. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2011002470

35.

Packard

B. W. L.

Jeffers

K. C.

(2013). Advising and progress in the community college STEM transfer pathway. NACADA Journal, 33(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-13-015

36.

Packard

B. W. L.

Tuladhar

Lee

J. S.

(2013). Advising in the classroom: How community college STEM faculty support transfer-bound students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(4), 14–20.

37.

Reyes

M. E.

(2011). Unique challenges for women of color in STEM transferring from community colleges to universities. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.324m5t1535026g76

38.

Riessman

C. K.

(1993). Narrative analysis (Vol. 30). Sage.

39.

Scott

T. P.

Thigpin

S. S.

Bentz

A. O.

(2017). Transfer learning community: Overcoming transfer shock and increasing retention of mathematics and science majors. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621919

40.

Smith

N. L.

Van Aken

E. M.

(2020). Systematic literature review of persistence of engineering transfer students. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(4), 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20357

41.

Spradley

(1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

42.

Thiry

Hug

(2021). Sustaining student engagement and equity in computing departments during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM technical symposium on computer science education (SIGCSE '21) (pp. 987–993). Association of Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432381

43.

Thiry

Laursen

S. L.

Hunter

A.-B.

(2011). What experiences help students become scientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(4), 357–388.

44.

Townley

Katz

Wandersman

Skiles

Schillaci

M. J.

Timmerman

B. E.

Mousseau

T. A.

(2013). Exploring the role of sense of community in the undergraduate transfer student experience. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21529

45.

Wang

(2009). Baccalaureate attainment and college persistence of community college transfer students at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9133-z

46.

Wang

(2013). Baccalaureate expectations of community college students: Socio-demographic, motivational, and contextual influences. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 115(4), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500402

47.

Wang

(2016). Course-taking patterns of community college students beginning in STEM: Using data mining techniques to reveal viable STEM transfer pathways. Research in Higher Education, 57(5), 544–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9397-4

48.

Wang

(2017). Toward a holistic theoretical model of momentum for community college student success. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 32, 259–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48983-4_6

49.

Wang

(2021). On my own: The challenge and promise of building equitable STEM transfer pathways. Harvard Education Press.

50.

Washburn

Bragg

D. D.

(2022). How NSF S-STEM scholarship students experience college during COVID-19: Lessons to improve STEM education. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 46(1-2), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2021.1981491

51.

Wickersham

Wang

(2016). What’s life got to do with it? The role of life experiences in shaping female community college students’ transfer intent in STEM fields of study. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(12), 1001–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1211039

52.

Yin

R. K.

(2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publishing.

53.

Yosso

T. J.

(2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006

54.

Zhang

Y. L.

Adamuti-Trache

Connolly

(2019). From community college attendants to baccalaureate recipients: A planned behavior model for transfer students in STEM fields of study. The Journal of Higher Education, 90(3), 373–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1536935

55.

Zilvinskis

Dumford

A. D.

(2018). The relationship between transfer student status, student engagement, and high-impact practice participation. Community College Review, 46(4), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552118781495

Navigating Transfer “Pivotal Points” in Challenging Contexts: A Longitudinal Investigation of STEM Transfer Students’ Pathways During COVID-19

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References