High Impact Practices Through Experiential Student Philanthropy: A Case Study of the Mayerson Student Philanthropy Project and Academic Success at Northern Kentucky University

Abstract

High impact educational practices are active learning strategies that benefit learning outcomes, increase student engagement, and support student retention. This study examines the retention and persistence impact of student philanthropy, an active learning approach that engages students with the community by incorporating a philanthropy component into college courses. Results from this study demonstrate that students who participated in one or more student philanthropy courses had a substantially higher four-year graduation rate in comparison to students overall. Participants also exhibited a greater number of completed credit hours compared to the general university population and a higher semester-to-semester retention rate. This affirms the value of student philanthropy as a High Impact Teaching Practice (HITP) that actively engages students inside and outside of the classroom, around the university campus, and in the community.

Keywords

experiential philanthropy student philanthropy high impact teaching student success

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed

Olberding

J. C.

(2007). Can student philanthropy help to address the current nonprofit identity crisis? A case study of a multiyear, multidisciplinary project at Northern Kentucky University. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(3–4), 593–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2007.12001500

Astin

A. W.

Oseguera

(2005). Degree attainment rates at American colleges and universities. Revised Edition. Higher Education Research Institution, UCLA.

Astin

A. W.

Sax

L. J.

(1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development, 39(3), 251–263.

Bringle

R. G.

Hatcher

J. A.

Muthiah

R. N.

(2010). The role of service-learning on the retention of first-year students to second year. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16(2), 38–49. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0016.203

Brownell

J. E.

Swaner

L. E.

(2010). Five high impact practices: Research on learning outcomes, completion, and quality. Association of American Colleges & Universities.

Campbell

D. A.

(2014). Practicing philanthropy in American higher education: Cultivating engaged citizens and nonprofit sector professionals. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2014.12001783

Chan

R. Y.

(2016). Understanding the purpose of higher education: An analysis of the economic and social benefits for competing a college degree. Journal of Education, Policy, Planning, and Administration, 6(5), 1–41.

Currie-Mueller

J. L.

Littlefield

R. S.

(2018). Embracing service-learning opportunities: Student perceptions of service-learning as an aid to effectively learn course material. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v18i1.21356

DeAngelo

Franke

Hurtado

Pryor

J. H.

Tran

(2011). Completing college: Assessing graduation rates at four-year institutions. Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.

10.

Fink

L. D.

(2016). Five high impact teaching practices. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 9, 3–17.

11.

Freeman

T. M.

(2020). Connecting undergraduate philanthropic and nonprofit studies to the high-impact practice community. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 10(2), 121–122.

12.

Glogowska

Young

Lockyer

(2007). Should I go or should I stay? A study of factors influencing students’ decisions on early leaving. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407074115

13.

Green

L. B.

Walkuski

C. B.

(2020). Does teaching philanthropy change behavior after graduation? Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 10(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.18666/JNEL-2020-V10-I2-10086

14.

Jaschik

(2020, March 23). Coronavirus has colleges fearful about yield, searching for the right strategy. Admissions, Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2020/03/23/admissions-state-uncertainty

15.

Kezar

(2004). Obtaining integrity? Reviewing and examining the charter between higher education and society. The Review of Higher Education, 27(4), 429–459. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2004.0013

16.

Kuh

(2020). Bundling effective educational practices may make experiential philanthropic studies matter more. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 10(2), 201–203.

17.

Kuh

O’Donnell

Schneider

C. G.

(2017). HIPs at ten. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(5), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2017.1366805

18.

Kuh

G. D.

(2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. AAC&U.

19.

Kuh

G. D.

O’Donnell

Reed

(2013). Ensuring quality & taking high-impact practices to scale. AAC&U.

20.

Lambert

M. T.

(2014). Privatization and the public good. Harvard University Education Press.

21.

Larson

K. C.

(2015). Uniting Hispanic film studies with civic engagement: A chance for personal transformation. Hispania, 98(3), 533–548.

22.

Larson

K. C.

(2017). Film as engaged learning: A study on teaching civics through Spanish culture. Journal of Community Engagement and Higher Education, 9(1), 61–72.

23.

Larson

K. C.

Fieler

(2019). Spain, Germany, and the holocaust: Uniting global learning and student philanthropy through transdisciplinarity. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1002.01

24.

Lockeman

K. S.

Pelco

L. E.

(2013). The relationship between service-learning and degree completion. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 20(1), 18–30.

25.

McDonald

Miller

W. M.

McDougle

(2017). Connecting through giving: Understanding the effect of the Mayerson student philanthropy project. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 7(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.18666/jnel-2017-v7-i2-8177

26.

McDonald

Olberding

J. C.

(2012). Learning by giving: A quasi-experimental study of student philanthropy in criminal justice education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 23(3), 307–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2011.604339

27.

McDougle

McDonald

Huafang

McIntyre Miller

Chengxin

(2017). Can philanthropy be taught? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(2), 330–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016662355

28.

Millisor

Olberding

J. C.

(2009). Student philanthropy in colleges and universities. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 13(4), 11–16.

29.

Mungo

M. H.

(2017). Closing the gap: Can service-learning enhance retention, graduation, and GPAs of students of color? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 23(2), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0023.203

30.

National Survey of Student Engagement. (2007). Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success. National Survey of Student Engagement. Center for Postsecondary Research. School of Education, Indiana University Bloomington. http://nsse.indiana.edu/

31.

Northern Kentucky University—Office of Institutional Research. (2020, April 15). Enrollment, degrees, certifications, and graduation. https://public.tableau.com/profile/ir6132#!/vizhome/shared/PT4K2KWBN

32.

Ober

D. R.

Beekman

J. A.

Pierce

R. L.

(2018). Analyzing four year public university and two year college graduation rates. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(4), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i4.3129

33.

Olberding

J. C.

(2009). “ Indirect giving” to nonprofit organizations: An emerging model of student philanthropy. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(4), 463–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2009.12001572

34.

Olberding

J. C.

(2012). Does student philanthropy work? A study of long-term effects of the “learning by giving” approach. Innovative Higher Education, 37(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9189-5

35.

Olberding

J. C.

Neikirk

(2010). Student philanthropy: A handbook for college and university faculty. Scripps Howard Center for Civic Engagement at Northern Kentucky University.

36.

Osborne

R. E.

Hammerich

Hensley

(1998). Student effects of service-learning: Tracking change across a semester. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5(1), 5–13.

37.

Reed

S. C.

Rosenberg

Statham

Rosing

(2015). The effect of community service learning on undergraduate persistence in three institutional contexts. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 21(2), 22–36.

38.

Saltmarsh

O’Meara

Sandman

Giles

Cowdery

Liang

Buglione

(2014). Becoming a steward of place: Lessons from AASCU Carnegie community engagement applications. American Association of State Colleges and Universities.

39.

Scripps Howard Center for Civic Engagement [SHCCE] (2019). The Mayerson student philanthropy project: An investment in learning, annual report. https://inside.nku.edu/content/dam/nkuhome/images/scripps/docs/MC190490_MayersonAnnuualReport2019.pdf

40.

Shapiro

Dundar

Wakhungu

P. K.

Yuan

Nathan

Hwang

(2015). Completing college: A national view of student attainment rates – fall 2009 cohort (signature report no. 10). National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.

41.

Tentsho

McNeil

Tongkumchum

(2019). Examining timely graduation rates of undergraduate students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-10-2017-0124

42.

The Chronicle of Higher Education. (2012/2015). College completion: Who graduates from college, who doesn’t, and why it matters. http://collegecompletion.chronicle.com/

43.

The National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement. (2012). A crucible moment: College learning and democracy’s future. Association of American Colleges and Universities.

44.

Thomas

(2014). Factors that influence college completion intention of undergraduate students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0099-4

45.

Tinto

(1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089

46.

Tinto

(1987). Leaving college. University of Chicago Press.

47.

Tinto

(1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.

48.

Tinto

(1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 599–623. https://doi.org/10.2307/2959965

49.

Tinto

(2017). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254–269.

50.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Digest of Education Statistics, 2017 (NCES 2018-070), Table 330.10. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=76

51.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). The Condition of Education, 2019 (NCES 2019-144), Undergraduate Retention and Graduation Rates. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=40

52.

Yue

(2017). Rethinking graduation and time to degree: A fresh perspective. Research in Higher Education, 58(2), 184–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9420-4

53.

Yue

Hart

S. M.

(2017). Service-Learning and graduation: Evidence from event history analysis. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 23(2), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0023.202