Mathematics has been a barrier for degree attainment. Research has focused on mathematics generally and not the transition from remedial to college-level coursework. This study examined the effects of delaying enrollment in college-level mathematics on student success. Propensity score matching minimized bias between immediate and delayed enrollment in a college-level course. Our findings indicated that delaying enrollment in a college-level course changed the likelihood a university retained first-time remedial mathematics students after Years 1 and 2. No evidence was found to suggest remedial students’ decision to delay enrollment in a college-level course affected undergraduate grade point average or earning a passing grade in college-level mathematics. Results of course performance were biased toward those who attempted a college-level mathematics course; 25.7% of the matched sample who completed their remedial courses never enrolled in a college-level mathematics course, and most of those departed early. Our results support the importance of early completion of mathematics.
AdelmanC. (2006). The tool box revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. U.S. Department of Education.
2.
AshcraftM. H.KrauseJ. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 14, 243–248. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194059
3.
AshcraftM. H.MooreA. M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282908330580
4.
AttewellP.LavinD.DominaT.LeveyT. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 886–924. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0037
5.
AulckL.VelagapudiN.BlumenstockJ.WestJ. (2016). Predicting student dropout in higher education [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Machine Learning’s Data for Good Workshop, New York, NY, United States.
6.
AustinP. C. (2011). Optimal caliper widths for propensity‐score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.433
7.
AycasterP. W. (2001). Factors impacting success in community college developmental mathematics courses and subsequent courses. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 25, 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/106689201750192256
8.
BahrP. R. (2008). Does mathematics remediation work? A comparative analysis of academic attainment among community college students. Research in Higher Education, 49, 420–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9089-4
9.
BahrP. R. (2010a). Preparing the underprepared: An analysis of racial disparities in postsecondary mathematics remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 81, 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779049
10.
BahrP. R. (2010b). Revisiting the efficacy of postsecondary remediation: The moderating effects of depth/breadth of deficiency. The Review of Higher Education, 33, 177–205. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0128
11.
BahrP. R. (2012). Deconstructing remediation in community colleges: Exploring associations between course-taking patterns, course outcomes, and attrition from the remedial math and remedial writing sequences. Research in Higher Education, 53, 661–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9243-2
12.
BahrP. R. (2013). The aftermath of remedial math: Investigating the low rate of certificate completion among remedial math students. Research in Higher Education, 54, 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9281-4
13.
BaileyT.JeongD. W.ChoS. W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29, 255–270.
14.
BoylanH. R. (2009). Targeted intervention for developmental education students (TIDES). Journal of Developmental Education, 32(3), 14–23.
15.
BrykA. S.TreismanU. (2010, April). Make math a gateway, not a gatekeeper. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 56, B19–B20.
16.
CalcagnoJ. C.CrostaP.BaileyT.JenkinsD. (2007). Stepping stones to a degree: The impact of enrollment pathways and milestones on community college student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 48, 775–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9053-8
17.
CalcagnoJ. C.LongB. T. (2008). The impact of postsecondary remediation using a regression discontinuity approach: Addressing endogenous sorting and noncompliance (NCPR Working Paper). National Center for Postsecondary Research.
18.
CaliendoM.KopeinigS. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
19.
ChenX.SimoneS. (2016, September). Remedial coursetaking at U.S. public 2- and 4-year institutions: Scope, experiences, and outcomes (NCES 2016-405). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
CrispG.NoraA. (2010). Hispanic student success: Factors influencing the persistence and transfer decisions of Latino community college students enrolled in developmental education. Research in Higher Education, 51, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9151-x
22.
Crisp, G., & Delgado, C. (2014). The impact of developmental education on community college persistence and vertical transfer. Community College Review, 42, 99–117.
23.
D’AmicoM. M.MorganG. B.RobertsonT. C. (2011). Student achievement in identified workforce clusters: Understanding factors that influence student success. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 35, 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920902813444
24.
DeAngeloL.FrankeR.HurtadoS.PryorJ. H.TranS. (2011). Completing college: Assessing graduation rates at four-year institutions. Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
25.
DonhardtG. L. (2013). The fourth-year experience: Impediments to degree completion. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9234-z
26.
FikeD. S.FikeR. (2012). The consequences of delayed enrollment in developmental mathematics. Journal of Developmental Education, 35(3), 2–9.
27.
HerzogS. (2005). Measuring determinants of student return vs. dropout/stopout vs. transfer: A first-to-second year analysis of new freshmen. Research in Higher Education, 46, 883–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-6933-7
28.
HoD.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15, 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl013Pu
29.
HunterM. S.TobolowskyB. F.GardnerJ. N.EvenbeckS. E.PattengaleJ. A.SchallerM.SchreinerL. A., & Associates (2010). Helping sophomores succeed: Understanding and improving the second year experience. Jossey-Bass.
30.
JohnsonI. (2008). Enrollment, persistence and graduation of in-state students at a public research university: Does high school matter?Research in Higher Education, 49, 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9105-8
31.
KolajoE. F. (2004). From developmental education to graduation: A community college experience. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28, 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920490424078
32.
LaneF. C.ToY. M.ShelleyK.HensonR. K. (2012). An illustrative example of propensity score matching within education research. Career and Technical Education Research, 37, 187–212. https://doi:10.5328/cter37.3.187
33.
LuttenbergerS.WimmerS.PaechterM. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S141421
34.
MaX. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 520–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/749772
35.
MelguizoT.HagedornL. S.CypersS. (2008). Remedial/developmental education and the cost of community college transfer: A Los Angeles County sample. The Review of Higher Education, 31, 401–431. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0008
36.
MossB. G.YeatonW. H.LloydJ. E. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of developmental mathematics by embedding a randomized experiment within a regression discontinuity design. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 170–185. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713504988
37.
ParkT.WoodsC. S.HuS.JonesT. B.TandbergD. (2018). What happens to underprepared first-time-in-college students when developmental education is optional? The case of developmental math and intermediate algebra in the first semester. The Journal of Higher Education, 89, 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1390970
38.
ParsadB.LewisL.GreeneB. (2003, November). Remedial education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in fall 2000: Statistical analysis report. National Center for Education Statistics.
39.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
40.
SanfordT.HunterJ. M. (2011). Impact of performance-funding on retention and graduation rates. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(33), 1–27. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/949
ShieldsK. A.O’DwyerL. M. (2017). Remedial education and completing college: Exploring differences by credential and institutional level. Journal of Higher Education, 88, 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1243943
43.
SnyderT. D.de BreyC.DillowS. A. (2018). Digest of Education Statistics 2016 (NCES 2017-094). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
44.
StuartE. A.RubinD. B. (2008). Best practices in quasi-experimental designs. In OsborneJ. W. (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 155–176). SAGE.
UlmerW.MeansD. R.CawthonT. W.KristensenS. A. (2016). Investigation of remedial education course scores as a predictor of introduction-level course performances: A case analysis at one for-profit institution. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 18, 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115579675
47.
WangX.WangY.WickershamK.SunN.ChanH. (2017). Math requirement fulfillment and educational success of community college students: A matter of when. Community College Review, 45, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552116682829
48.
WolfleJ. D.WilliamsM. R. (2014). The impact of developmental mathematics courses and age, gender, and race and ethnicity on persistence and academic performance in Virginia community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2014.851956
49.
ZhangJ.ZhaoN.KongQ. P. (2019). The relationship between math anxiety and math performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1613. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613
50.
ZientekL. R.AlbertJ.ManageA.LiX.SechelskiA. (2018). A state-mandated policy: Effects on enrollment at one university. Journal of Developmental Education, 41(3), 10–17.
51.
ZientekL. R.FongC. J.PhelpsJ. (2019). Sources of mathematics self-efficacy of community college students enrolled in developmental mathematics. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43, 183–200. https://doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1357071
52.
ZientekL. R.YetkinerZ. E.ThompsonB. (2010). Characterizing the mathematics anxiety literature using confidence intervals as a literature review mechanism. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 424–438. https://doi:10.1080/00220670903383093
