The implementation of minority research and training programs at the postsecondary level has risen to close the educational achievement gap and generate a highly skilled and diverse science workforce. Numerous studies identify interventions influencing positive outcomes among minority research and training participants achieving graduate degrees. However, many of these studies utilize quantitative methods. To capture student voices and rich descriptive experiences, this study utilized a multiple case study featuring a narrative approach. Cross-case analysis identified four factors influencing matriculation into advanced degree programs: belonging and inclusion, peer mentoring, confidence as a scientist, and family influence. Findings from this study expand the current body of knowledge and provide implications for practice to better serve underrepresented students in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines.
AyresL.KavanaughK.KnaflK. A. (2003).
Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis.Qualitative Health Research,
13(6), 871–883. doi:10.1177/1049732303255359
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.
Englewood Cliffs, NC:
Prentice-Hall.
3.
Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003).
Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. The Journal of Higher Education,
74(2), 210–230.
CarterD. F. (2002). College students’ degree aspirations: A theoretical model and literature review with a focus on African American and Latino students. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: A handbook of theory and research (pp. 129–171). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
7.
CleavesA. (2005).
The formation of science choices in secondary school.International Journal of Science Education,
27(4), 471–486. doi:10.1080/0950069042000323746
8.
CraneyC.MckayT.MazzeoA.MorrisJ.PrigodichC.GrootR. (2011).
Cross discipline perception of the undergraduate research experience.The Journal of Higher Education,
82(5), 92–113. doi:10.1080/00221546.2011.11779086
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publication, Inc.
10.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2008). The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
11.
EaganM.HurtadoS.ChangM.GarciaG.HerreraF.GaribayJ. (2013).
Making a difference in science education: The impact of undergraduate research programs. American Educational Research Journal,
50(4), 683–713. doi:10.3102/0002831213482038
12.
EdgcombM. R.CroweH. A.RiceJ. D.MorrisS. J.WolffeR. J.McConnaughayK. D. (2010).
Peer and near-peer mentoring: Enhancing learning in summer research programs. Council of Undergraduate Quarterly,
31(2), 18–25. Retrieved from https://www.cur.org/assets/1/7/Edgcomb.pdf
13.
EsinC.FathiM.SquireC. (2014). Narrative analysis: The constructionist approach. In U. Lick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 203–216). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
14.
FisherR. J. (1993).
Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research,
20(2), 303–315. doi:10.1086/209351
15.
FloydA.ArthurL. (2012).
Researching from within: External and internal ethical engagement.International Journal of Research & Method in Education,
35(2), 171–180. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.670481
16.
FreemanM.deMarraisK.PreissleJ.RoulstonK.St. PierreE. (2007).
Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse.Educational Researcher,
36(1), 25–32. doi:10.3102/0013189X06298009
17.
GasiewskiJ.GarciaG.HerreraF.TranM.NewmanC. (2010). Barricades, bridges, and programmatic adaptation: A multi-campus case study of STEM undergraduate research programs. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://www.heri.ucla.edu/nih/?c=presentations
18.
GibauG. S. (2015).
Considering student voices: Examining the experiences of underrepresented students in intervention programs. CBE Life Science Education,
14(3), 1–12. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-06-0103
GordonM. (2009).
The misuses and effective uses of constructivist teaching. Journal ofTeachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,
15(6), 737–746. doi:10.1080/13540600903357058
21.
GrayD. E. (2009). Doing research in the real world (2nd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
22.
HackettG.BetzN. E. (1981).
A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women.Journal of Vocational Behavior,
18(3), 326–339. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1
23.
HunterA. B.LaursenS. L.SeymourE. (2007).
Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development.Science Education,
91(1), 36–74. doi:10.1002/sce.20173
24.
HurtadoS.CabreraN. L.LinM. H.ArellanoL.EspinosaL. L. (2009).
Diversifying science: Underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs.Research in Higher Education,
50(2), 189–214. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9114-7
25.
HurtadoS.MilemJ. F.Clayton-PedersenA.AllenW. R. (1998).
Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice.Review of Higher Education,
21(3), 279–302. doi:10.1353/rhe.1998.0003
26.
HurtadoS.PonjuanL. (2005).
Latino educational outcomes and the campus climate.Journal of Hispanic Higher Education,
4(3), 235–251. doi:10.1177/1538192705276548
27.
JohnsonA.BrownJ.CarloneH.CuevasA. K. (2011).
Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science.Journal of Research Scientific Teaching,
48(4), 339–366. doi:10.1002/tea.20411
28.
KaiserK. (2009).
Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research.Qualitative Health Research,
19(11), 1632–1641. doi:10.1177/1049732309350879
29.
KimY. K.SaxL. J. (2009).
Student–faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status.Research in Higher Education,
50(5), 437–459. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9127-x
30.
LaursenS.HunterA. B.SeymourE.ThiryH.MeltonG. (2010). Undergraduate research in the sciences: Engaging students in real science.
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
31.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994).
Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance.Journal of Vocational Behavior,
45(1), 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
32.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (2000).
Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis.Journal of Counseling Psychology,
47(1), 36–49. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36
33.
LinnehanF. (2001).
The relation of a work-based mentoring program to the academic performance and behavior of African American students. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
5(3), 310–325. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1810
MattanahJ.BrandB.HancockG. (2004).
Parental attachment, separation individuation, and college student adjustment: A structural equation analysis of meditational effects.Journal of Counseling Psychology,
51(2), 213–225. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.2.213
36.
McGeeR.KellerJ. L. (2007).
Identifying future scientists: Predicting persistence into research training.CBE-Life Science Education,
6(4), 316–331. doi:10.1187/cbe.07-04-0020
37.
MilesM.HubermanA. (1994). An expanded source book: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.).
London, England:
Sage.
38.
MillsJ.BonnerA.FrancisK. (2006).
The development of constructivist grounded theory.International Journal of Qualitative Methods,
5(1), 25–35. doi:10.1177/160940690600500103
39.
MurrayM.SargeantS. (2011). Narrative psychology. In D. Harper & A. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: An introduction for students and practitioners (pp. 163–175). Chichester, England: Wiley.
40.
MuseusS. D.PalmerR. T.DavisR. J.MarambaD. C. (2011).
Special issue: Racial and ethnic minority students’ success in STEM education. ASHE Higher Education Report,
36(6), 1–140. doi:10.1002/aehe.3606
41.
National Science Board (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/
42.
NoddingsN. (2013). Education and democracy in the 21st century.
New York, NY:
Teachers College Press.
43.
ParhamT. A.AustinN. L. (1994).
Career development and African Americans: A contextual reappraisal using the nigrescence construct.Journal of Vocational Behavior,
44(2), 139–154. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1010
44.
RubinH. J.RubinI. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
45.
RussellM.AtwaterM. (2005).
Traveling the road to success: A discourse on persistence throughout the science pipeline with African American students at a predominantly white institution.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
42(6), 691–715. doi:10.1002/tea.20068
Schultz, P. W., Hernandez, P. R., Woodcock, A., Estrada, M., Chance, R. C., Aguilar, M., & Serpe, R. T. (2011).
Patching the pipeline. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
33(1), 95–114.
48.
SeidmanI. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and social sciences.
New York, NY:
Teachers College Press.
49.
SeymourE.HunterA. B.LaursenS. L.DeAntoniT. (2004).
Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study.Science Education,
88(4), 493–534. doi:10.1002/sce.10131
50.
ShentonA. K. (2004).
Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research project.Education for Information,
22(2), 63–75. doi:10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
51.
ShkediA. (2005). Multiple case narrative: A qualitative approach to studying multiple populations.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands:
Benjamins.
52.
SlovacekS.JacobS.FlenouryL. (2015).
Dynamic influence of family on college and career choices of underrepresented minorities in the biomedical sciences. Journal of Education and Human Development,
4(4), 63–76. doi:0.15640/jehd.v4n4a9
53.
StakeJ.MaresK. (2005).
Evaluating the impact of science-enrichment programs on adolescents’ science motivation and confidence: The splashdown effect.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
42(4), 359–375. doi:10.1002/tea.20052
54.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
55.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis.
New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
56.
SykesP.PottsA. (Eds.). (2008). Researching education from the inside: Investigations from within.
London, England:
Routledge.
57.
TenenbaumH. R.CrosbyF. J.GlinerM. D. (2001).
Mentoring relationships in graduate school.Journal of Vocational Behavior,
59(3), 326–341. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1804
U.S. General Accounting office. (2005). Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics programs and related trends. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06114.pdf
60.
VillarejoM.BarlowA. E.KoganD.VeazeyB. D.SweeneyJ. K. (2008).
Encouraging minority undergraduate to choose science careers: Career paths survey results. CBE- Life Sciences Education,
7(4), 349–409. doi:10.1187/cbe.08-04-0018
61.
WatsonC. (2006).
Unreliable narrators? “Inconsistency” (and some inconstancy) in interviews.Qualitative Research,
6(3), 367–384. doi:10.1177/1468794106065008
62.
WebsterL.MertovaP. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
