Personalities of Introductory Course Instructors and Course Completion

Abstract

Online courses are often criticized for having lower retention rates than traditional courses, especially introductory courses. This study aimed to determine whether there was a relationship between online and traditional instructor personality traits and course completion rate for introductory course instructors at a higher education institution in the Western United States. Instructor personality traits, as measured by the NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), were correlated with student course completion rate. Independent t tests were used to determine whether the relationship differed as a function of modality. There were no statistically significant relationships found between online and traditional instructor personality traits and course completion rate, but there were statistically significant differences between modalities for extroversion, agreeableness, and course completion rate. The results imply the traditional modality better supports individuals with these traits and allows for greater expression of the traits. The findings provide a greater understanding of the diversity among teachers in different modalities.

Keywords

course completion rate student retention instructor personality online traditional NEO-FFI-3 five factor

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atchley

Wingenbach

Akers

(2013) Comparison of course completion and student performance through online and traditional courses. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning 14(4): 104–116. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl.

Bawa

(2016) Retention in online courses. SAGE Open 6(1): 1–11. doi:10.1177/2158244015621777.

Bliss

Webb

St. Andre

(2012) The impact of the University of Utah's LEAP program on student performance. JGE: The Journal of General Education 61(1): 39–58. Retrieved from http://www.psupress.org/journals/jnls_jge.html.

Brown

J. M.

(2012) Online learning: A comparison of web-based and land-based courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 13(1): 39–42. Retrieved from http://www.infoagepub.com/quarterly-review-of-distance-education.html.

Cochran

Campbell

Baker

Leeds

(2014) The role of student characteristics in predicting retention in online courses. Research in Higher Education 55(1): 27–48. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9305-8.

Donhardt

(2013) The fourth-year experience: Impediments to degree completion. Innovative Higher Education 38(3): 207–221. doi:10.1007/s10755-0129234-z.

Driscoll

Jicha

Hunt

A. N.

Tichavsky

Thompson

(2012) Can online courses deliver in-class results?: A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology 40(4): 312–331. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12446624.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A.-G.

(2013) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1.9: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39: 175–191. Retrieved from http://www.gpower.hhu.de/.

Fetzner

(2013) What do unsuccessful online students want us to know? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 17(1): 13–27. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main.

10.

Fricker

(2013) The 24/7 always available always on graduate/teaching assistant: A case study of nearly perfect retention and completion in an online course. Review of Higher Education & Self-Learning 6(21): 144–152. Retrieved from http://www.intellectbase.org/journals.php.

11.

Furnham

Monsen

Ahmetoglu

(2009) Typical intellectual engagement, Big Five personality traits, approaches to learning and cognitive ability predictors of academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 79(4): 769–782. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8279.

12.

Kendall

K. D.

Schussler

E. E.

(2013) Evolving impressions: Undergraduate perceptions of graduate teaching assistants and faculty members over a semester. CBE—Life Sciences Education 12(1): 92–105. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-07-0110.

13.

Kim

L. E.

MacCann

(2016) What is students' ideal university instructor personality? An investigation of absolute and relative personality preferences. Personality and Individual Differences 102(2016): 190–203. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.068.

14.

Kneipp

L. B.

Kelly

K. E.

Biscoe

J. D.

Richard

(2010) The impact of instructor's personality characteristics on quality of instruction. College Student Journal 44(4): 901–905. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.com/College_Student_Journal.html.

15.

Layne

(2012) Defining effective teaching. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 23(1): 43–68. Retrieved from http://celt.muohio.edu/ject/issue.php?v=23&n=1.

16.

Lee

Choi

(2011) A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research & Development 59(5): 593–618. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9177.

17.

McCrae

Costa

(2013) Introduction to the empirical and theoretical status of the Five-Factor Model of personality traits. In: Widiger

T. A.

Costa

P. R.

(eds) Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 15–27. doi:10.1037/13939-002.

18.

McCrae

Costa

(2010) NEO inventories professional manual: NEO PI-3, NEO FFI-3, NEO PI-R, Lutz, FL: PAR.

19.

O'Gara

Karp

M. M.

Hughes

K. L.

(2009) An exploratory study of student perspectives. Community College Review 36(3): 195–218. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0091552108327186.

20.

Patrick

C. L.

(2011) Student evaluations of teaching: Effects of the big five personality traits, grades and the validity hypothesis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36(2): 239–249. doi:10.1080/02602930903308258.

21.

Qureshi

M. A.

Niazi

H. K.

(2012) Impact of effective teachers on students' academic achievements. Journal of Educational Research (1027-9776) 15(1): 30–38. Retrieved from http://www.iub.edu.pk/jer/Home.html.

22.

Richardson

R. C.

Arker

(2010) Personalities in the classroom: Making the most of them. Kappa Delta Pi Record 46(2): 76–81. doi:10.1080/00228958.2010.10516698.

23.

Shapiro

Bray

(2011) Improving retention and enrollment forecasting in part-time programs. Continuing Higher Education Review 75: 121–129. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ967813.

24.

Sprinkle

J. E.

(2009) Student perceptions of educator effectiveness: A follow-up study. College Student Journal 43(4): 1341–1358. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.biz/college_student_journal.

25.

Stoessel

Ihme

T. A.

Barbarino

Fisseler

Stürmer

(2015) Sociodemographic diversity and distance education: Who drops out from academic programs and why? Research in Higher Education 56(3): 228–246. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9343-x.

26.

Tahir

A. A.

Shah

A. F.

(2012) Relationship of students' perceptions about teacher's personality with academic achievement of students. Journal of Educational Research (1027-9776) 15(2): 5–13. Retrieved from http://www.iub.edu.pk/jer/home.html.

27.

Talbert

P. Y.

(2012) Strategies to increase enrollment, retention, and graduation rates. Journal of Developmental Education 36(1): 22–24. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1035683.

28.

Tinto

(1987) Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

29.

Varner

(2013) Undergraduate perceptions of online coursework. Journal of Applied Learning Technology 3(1): 16–20. Retrieved from http://www.salt.org/salt.asp?ss=l&pn=jalt.

30.

Widiger

T. A.

Costa

P. T.

(2012) Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: The Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality 80(6): 1471–1506. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00776.x.

31.

Willging

P. A.

Johnson

S. D.

(2009) Factors that influence students' decision to drop out of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 13(3): 115–127. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main.

32.

Wisneski

J. E.

Ozogul

Bichelmeyer

B. A.

(2017) Investigating the impact of learning environments on undergraduate students' academic performance in a prerequisite and post-requisite course sequence. The Internet and Higher Education 32: 1–10. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.003.

33.

Wolff

B. G.

Wood-Kustanowitz

A. M.

Ashkenazi

J. M.

(2014) Student performance at a community college: Mode of delivery, employment, and academic skills as predictors of success. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 10(2): 166–n/a. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1614680177?accountid=15152.

34.

Yazici

Altun

(2013) Type-A behavior, gender, and job satisfaction: A research on instructors. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 13(3): 1455–1459. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1017666.