Online courses are often criticized for having lower retention rates than traditional courses, especially introductory courses. This study aimed to determine whether there was a relationship between online and traditional instructor personality traits and course completion rate for introductory course instructors at a higher education institution in the Western United States. Instructor personality traits, as measured by the NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), were correlated with student course completion rate. Independent t tests were used to determine whether the relationship differed as a function of modality. There were no statistically significant relationships found between online and traditional instructor personality traits and course completion rate, but there were statistically significant differences between modalities for extroversion, agreeableness, and course completion rate. The results imply the traditional modality better supports individuals with these traits and allows for greater expression of the traits. The findings provide a greater understanding of the diversity among teachers in different modalities.
AtchleyW.WingenbachG.AkersC. (2013) Comparison of course completion and student performance through online and traditional courses. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning14(4): 104–116. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl.
2.
BawaP. (2016) Retention in online courses. SAGE Open6(1): 1–11. doi:10.1177/2158244015621777.
3.
BlissC.WebbJ.St. AndreM. (2012) The impact of the University of Utah's LEAP program on student performance. JGE: The Journal of General Education61(1): 39–58. Retrieved from http://www.psupress.org/journals/jnls_jge.html.
CochranJ.CampbellS.BakerH.LeedsE. (2014) The role of student characteristics in predicting retention in online courses. Research in Higher Education55(1): 27–48. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9305-8.
6.
DonhardtG. (2013) The fourth-year experience: Impediments to degree completion. Innovative Higher Education38(3): 207–221. doi:10.1007/s10755-0129234-z.
7.
DriscollA.JichaK.HuntA. N.TichavskyL.ThompsonG. (2012) Can online courses deliver in-class results?: A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology40(4): 312–331. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12446624.
8.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2013) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1.9: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods39: 175–191. Retrieved from http://www.gpower.hhu.de/.
FrickerD. (2013) The 24/7 always available always on graduate/teaching assistant: A case study of nearly perfect retention and completion in an online course. Review of Higher Education & Self-Learning6(21): 144–152. Retrieved from http://www.intellectbase.org/journals.php.
11.
FurnhamA.MonsenJ.AhmetogluG. (2009) Typical intellectual engagement, Big Five personality traits, approaches to learning and cognitive ability predictors of academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology79(4): 769–782. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8279.
12.
KendallK. D.SchusslerE. E. (2013) Evolving impressions: Undergraduate perceptions of graduate teaching assistants and faculty members over a semester. CBE—Life Sciences Education12(1): 92–105. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-07-0110.
13.
KimL. E.MacCannC. (2016) What is students' ideal university instructor personality? An investigation of absolute and relative personality preferences. Personality and Individual Differences102(2016): 190–203. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.068.
14.
KneippL. B.KellyK. E.BiscoeJ. D.RichardB. (2010) The impact of instructor's personality characteristics on quality of instruction. College Student Journal44(4): 901–905. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.com/College_Student_Journal.html.
LeeY.ChoiJ. (2011) A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research & Development59(5): 593–618. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9177.
17.
McCraeR.CostaP. (2013) Introduction to the empirical and theoretical status of the Five-Factor Model of personality traits. In: WidigerT. A.CostaP. R. (eds) Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 15–27. doi:10.1037/13939-002.
O'GaraL.KarpM. M.HughesK. L. (2009) An exploratory study of student perspectives. Community College Review36(3): 195–218. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0091552108327186.
20.
PatrickC. L. (2011) Student evaluations of teaching: Effects of the big five personality traits, grades and the validity hypothesis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education36(2): 239–249. doi:10.1080/02602930903308258.
21.
QureshiM. A.NiaziH. K. (2012) Impact of effective teachers on students' academic achievements. Journal of Educational Research (1027-9776)15(1): 30–38. Retrieved from http://www.iub.edu.pk/jer/Home.html.
22.
RichardsonR. C.ArkerE. (2010) Personalities in the classroom: Making the most of them. Kappa Delta Pi Record46(2): 76–81. doi:10.1080/00228958.2010.10516698.
StoesselK.IhmeT. A.BarbarinoM.FisselerB.StürmerS. (2015) Sociodemographic diversity and distance education: Who drops out from academic programs and why?Research in Higher Education56(3): 228–246. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9343-x.
26.
TahirA. A.ShahA. F. (2012) Relationship of students' perceptions about teacher's personality with academic achievement of students. Journal of Educational Research (1027-9776)15(2): 5–13. Retrieved from http://www.iub.edu.pk/jer/home.html.
TintoV. (1987) Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
VarnerB. (2013) Undergraduate perceptions of online coursework. Journal of Applied Learning Technology3(1): 16–20. Retrieved from http://www.salt.org/salt.asp?ss=l&pn=jalt.
30.
WidigerT. A.CostaP. T. (2012) Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: The Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality80(6): 1471–1506. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00776.x.
31.
WillgingP. A.JohnsonS. D. (2009) Factors that influence students' decision to drop out of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks13(3): 115–127. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main.
32.
WisneskiJ. E.OzogulG.BichelmeyerB. A. (2017) Investigating the impact of learning environments on undergraduate students' academic performance in a prerequisite and post-requisite course sequence. The Internet and Higher Education32: 1–10. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.003.
33.
WolffB. G.Wood-KustanowitzA. M.AshkenaziJ. M. (2014) Student performance at a community college: Mode of delivery, employment, and academic skills as predictors of success. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching10(2): 166–n/a. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1614680177?accountid=15152.
