Abstract

Keywords
We read with interest the study by Ozyigit et al. wherein the authors describe fungal bronchitis as a distinct clinical entity that responds to antifungal therapy. 1 The authors define “bronchitis” based on persistent productive cough and exacerbation of underlying airway disease. The same definition is also applicable to bronchiectasis, a widely recognized entity. Notably, 24 of the 31 study participants had bronchiectasis, which explains the symptoms attributed to “bronchitis”. Further, the mean serum Aspergillus fumigatus-specific IgE, A. fumigatus-specific IgG levels, and total IgE were 19.4 KUA/L, 54.3 mg/L, and 2.121 U/L, respectively, in the study population. The majority of the subjects in the study had asthma as their underlying airway disease. The constellation of asthma, elevated serum total IgE, A. fumigatus-specific IgE, and IgG, and bronchiectasis is consistent with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). It would be interesting to know what proportion of patients in the current study satisfied the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) ABPA-working group criteria for diagnosing ABPA. 2 Two different randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that oral triazoles are beneficial in treating ABPA. 3,4 It is therefore not surprising that patients with “fungal bronchitis” responded to azoles in the current study.
Footnotes
Author contributions
ISS, VM, and RA involved in initial drafting, and correction of the manuscript.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: RA has received grant support from Cipla, India, on research in ABPA; has received consultancy fees from Pulmatrix Inc., USA.
