This article explores the possibility of a trade-off between citizens’ trust in government and their rates of political participation. Trust and political participation are both of interest in political science, but the relationship between the two remains unclear. Drawing on political trust and political participation literature, the article utilises data from rounds 1–9 of the European Social Survey to investigate whether a trade-off between political trust and political participation can be found. The results suggest that although greater trust in government is variably predictive of either higher or lower rates of political participation, rates of participation reach a peak at a particular level of trust, followed by a decline. This drop-off effect suggests that citizens may become complacent and disengaged as they reach high levels of trust. The trust-participation trade-off illustrates one way in which policy choices may have unexpected consequences which policymakers should consider.
AustinPHuxJ (2002) A Brief Note on Overlapping Confidence Intervals. Journal of Vascular Surgery36 (1): 194–195.
2.
Bakardjieva EngelbrektABrembergNMichalskiA, et al. (2019) Trust in the European Union: What Is It and How Does It Matter? In: Bakardjieva EngelbrektABrembergNMichalskiA, et al. (eds) Trust in the European Union in Challenging Times: Interdisciplinary European Studies. Uppsala: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.1–22.
3.
BraunDHutterS (2016) Political Trust, Extra-Representational Participation and the Openness of Political Systems. International Political Science Review37 (2): 151–165.
4.
CekaB (2012) The Perils of Political Competition: Explaining Participation and Trust in Political Parties in Eastern Europe. Comparative Political Studies46 (12): 1610–1635.
5.
ChenYPaolinoPMasonD (2021) Who Protests and Why: Hierarchical Government Trust and Protest Participation in China. Journal of East Asian Studies21 (3): 499–513.
6.
ChiruMGerghinaS (2012) Does the Confidence in the EU Spill Over to the National Level? A Longitudinal Analysis of Political Trust in Central Europe. Perspectives on European Politics and Society13 (2): 226–245.
7.
CrepazM (2017) What’s Trust Got To Do With It? The Effects of In-Group and Out-Group Trust on Conventional and Unconventional Political Participation. Social Science Quarterly98 (1): 261–281.
8.
De BlokLKumlinS (2022) Losers’ Consent in Changing Welfare States: Output Dissatisfaction, Experienced Voice and Political Distrust. Political Studies70 (4): 867–886.
9.
DevineD (2024) Does Political Trust Matter? A Meta-Analysis on the Consequences of Trust. Political Behavior46: 2241–2262.
10.
ESS Rounds 1-9: European Social Survey Rounds 1-9 Data (2002–2018) Sikt – Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, Norway – Data Archive and Distributor of ESS Data for ESS ERIC. Available at: https://ess.sikt.no/en/ (accessed 30 August 2024).
11.
FungKLiuCChungM (2022) Bowling Alone in Taiwan? Political Trust and Civic Participation of Taiwanese and Their Appraisal of Liberal Democracy and Personal Wellbeing. Social Indicators Research159: 1085–1102.
12.
GrimmelikhuijsenSKniesE (2017) Validating a Scale for Citizen Trust in Government Organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences83 (3): 583–601.
13.
HammJCarreraJVan FossenJ, et al. (2023) Conceptualizing Trust and Distrust as Alternative Stable States: Lessons from the Flint Water Crisis. Ecology and Society28 (3): 14.
14.
HolbeinJ (2016) Left Behind? Citizen Responsiveness to Government Performance Information. The American Political Science Review110 (2): 353–368.
15.
HoogheM (2011) Why There Is Basically Only One Form of Political Trust. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations13: 269–275.
16.
HoogheMMarienS (2013) A Comparative Analysis of the Relation Between Political Trust and Forms of Political Participation in Europe. European Societies15 (1): 131–152.
17.
HoogheMMarienSOserJ (2017) Great Expectations: The Effect of Democratic Ideals on Political Trust in European Democracies. Contemporary Politics23 (2): 214–230.
18.
HoogheMMarienSPauwelsT (2011) Where Do Distrusting Voters Turn to If There Is No Viable Exit or Voice Option? The Impact of Political Trust on Electoral Behaviour in the Belgian Regional Elections ofJune, 2009. International Journal of Comparative Politics46 (2): 245–273.
19.
HuR (2016) The Impact of Chinese Political Efficacy and Political Participation on Their Trust in the Police. The Journal of Chinese Sociology3 (3): 1–17.
20.
HuheNChenJ (2024) Stratified Political Trust in a Nondemocratic Society: Magnitude, Forms, and Sources of Political Trust in Urban China. Journal of Chinese Political Science29: 55–75.
21.
JamesOMoseleyA (2014) Does Performance Information about Public Services Affect Citizens’ Perception, Satisfaction, and Voice Behaviour? Field Experiments with Absolute and Relative Performance Information. Public Administration92 (2): 493–511.
22.
KaaseM (1999) Interpersonal Trust, Political Trust and Non-Institutionalised Political Participation in Western Europe. West European Politics22 (2): 1–21.
23.
KnolMPestmanWGrobbeeD (2011) The (Mis)use of Overlap of Confidence Intervals to Assess Effect Modification. European Journal of Epidemiology26 (4): 253–254.
24.
KoivulaAMalinenSSaarinenA (2022) The Voice of Distrust? The Relationship between Political Trust, Online Political Participation and Voting. Journal of Trust Research11 (1): 59–74.
25.
LawlessJ (1987) Negative Binomial and Mixed Poisson Regression. The Canadian Journal of Statistics15 (3): 209–225.
26.
LiYYuX (2023) Trust, Political Knowledge and Institutionalized Political Participation: Evidence From China. Current Psychology42: 15019–15029.
27.
MarienS (2011) Measuring Political Trust Across Time and Space. In: HoogheMZmerliS (eds) Political Trust: Why Context Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp.13–46.
28.
MichalskiPMarchlewskaMFurmanA, et al. (2023) To Advise and Scrutinize the Government? Two Types of Political Knowledge, Political Trust and Unconventional Participation. Current Psychology42: 12104–12117.
29.
NakamuraAKimS (2010) Public Trust in Government in Japan and South Korea: Does the Rise of Critical Citizens Matter?Public Administration Review70 (5): 801–810.
30.
NorrisP (2022) In Praise of Scepticism: Trust but Verify. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
PaytonMGreenstoneMSchenkerN (2003) Overlapping Confidence Intervals or Standard Error Intervals: What Do They Mean in Terms of Statistical Significance?Journal of Insect Science3 (1): 1–6.
32.
PorumbescuG (2017) Linking Transparency to Trust in Government and Voice. American Review of Public Administration47 (5): 520–537.
33.
ProszowskaDJansenGDentersB (2022) On Their Own Turf? The Level Specificity of Political Trust in Multilevel Political Systems. Acta Politica57: 510–528.
34.
QuarantaMCancelaJMartínI, et al. (2021) Trust, Satisfaction and Political Engagement during Economic Crisis: Young Citizens in Southern Europe. Southern European Society and Politics26 (2): 153–179.
35.
RuelensANicaiseI (2020) Investigating a Typology of Trust Orientations Towards National and European Institutions: A Person-Centered Approach. Social Science Research87: 102414.
36.
SloamJ (2016) Diversity and Voice: The Political Participation of Young People in the European Union. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations18 (3): 521–537.
37.
StalsLIsacMClaesE (2022) Political Trust in Early Adolescence and Its Association with Intended Political Participation: A Cross-Sectional Study Situated in Flanders. YOUNG Editorial Group30 (4): 377–399.
38.
Van RyzinG (2007) Pieces of a Puzzle: Linking Government Performance, Citizen Satisfaction, and Trust. Public Performance and Management Review30 (4): 521–535.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
