Emotions are inseparable from political decision-making. This idea has been especially strongly supported for negative emotions. The current study examines the role of anxiety in forming political attitudes using data from a nationally representative American National Election Studies survey (N = 5900). Our path analysis highlights a significant indirect relationship between anxiety and political participation through two mediators: information-seeking tendencies and internal political efficacy. By examining the unique role of anxiety in political decision-making, our study provides a more nuanced understanding of how negative emotions can impact democracy.
AbelsonRP (1963) Computer Simulation of “Hot Cognition.” In: TomkinsSSMessickS (eds) Computer Simulation of Personality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp.277–298.
2.
AlbertsonBGadarianSK (2015) Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
American National Election Studies (2021) ANES 2020 Time Series Study Full Release [Dataset and Documentation], 19 July 2021 Version. Available at: www.electionstudies.org (accessed 25 October 2021).
4.
Ardèvol-AbreuADiehlTGil de ZúñigaH (2019) Antecedents of Internal Political Efficacy Incidental News Exposure Online and the Mediating Role of Political Discussion. Politics39 (1): 82–100.
5.
BanksAJ (2014) The Public’s Anger: White Racial Attitudes and Opinions Toward Health Care Reform. Political Behavior36 (3): 493–514.
6.
BennettWL (ed.) (2007) Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Available at: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/26089 (accessed 24 October 2021).
7.
BraderTValentinoNASuhayE (2008) What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat. American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 959–978.
8.
CampbellAGurinGMillerWE (1954) The Voter Decides. Oxford: Row, Peterson and Company.
9.
CarpiniMXD (2004) Mediating Democratic Engagement: The Impact of Communications on Citizens’ Involvement in Political and Civic Life. In: KaidLL (ed.) Handbook of Political Communication Research (LEA’s Communication Series). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp.395–434.
10.
CarpiniMXDKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. London: Yale University Press.
11.
CliffordSJeritJ (2018) Disgust, Anxiety, and Political Learning in the Face of Threat. American Journal of Political Science62 (2): 266–279.
12.
CraigSCMaggiottoMA (1982) Measuring Political Efficacy. Political Methodology8 (3): 85–109.
13.
De RiveraJ (1977) A Structural Theory of the Emotions. Psychological Issues10 (4, Mono40): 178.
14.
Delli CarpiniMX (2000) In Search of the Informed Citizen: What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. The Communication Review4 (1): 129–164.
15.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy65 (2): 135–150.
16.
ErişenC (2013) Emotions as a Determinant in Turkish Political Behavior. Turkish Studies14 (1): 115–135.
17.
FerejohnJAFiorinaMP (1974) The Paradox of Not Voting: A Decision Theoretic Analysis. American Political Science Review68 (2): 525–536.
18.
FrijdaNH (1986) The Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HenryJP (1986) Chapter 2—Neuroendocrine Patterns of Emotional Response. In: PlutchikRKellermanH (eds) Biological Foundations of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp.37–60.
21.
JohnstonCDLavineHWoodsonB (2015) Emotion and Political Judgment: Expectancy Violation and Affective Intelligence. Political Research Quarterly68 (3): 474–492.
22.
JungNKimYZúñigaHG, et al. (2011) The Mediating Role of Knowledge and Efficacy in the Effects of Communication on Political Participation. Mass Communication and Society14 (4): 407–430.
23.
KenskiKStroudNJ (2006) Connections Between Internet Use and Political Efficacy, Knowledge, and Participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media50 (2): 173–192.
24.
KundaZ (1991) The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 1990; 108 (3): 480–498.
25.
LauRRRedlawskDP (2001) Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science45 (4): 951–971.
26.
LeeKM (2006) Effects of Internet Use on College Students’ Political Efficacy. Cyberpsychology & Behavior9 (4): 415–422.
27.
LernerJSLiYValdesoloP, et al. (2015) Emotion and Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology66 (1): 799–823.
28.
LodgeMTaberCS (2005) The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis. Political Psychology26 (3): 455–482.
29.
MacKuenMWolakJKeeleL, et al. (2010) Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation. American Journal of Political Science54 (2): 440–458.
30.
MarcusGE (2002) The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
31.
MarcusGEMacKuenMB (1993) Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns. American Political Science Review87 (3): 672–685.
32.
MerollaJLZechmeisterEJ (2009) Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats Affect the Public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
NadeauRNiemiRGAmatoT (1995) Emotions, Issue Importance, and Political Learning. American Journal of Political Science39 (3): 558–574.
34.
PinkletonBEAustinEWFortmanKKJ (1998) Relationships of Media Use and Political Disaffection to Political Efficacy and Voting Behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media42 (1): 34–49.
35.
PlutchikR (1980) Chapter 1—A General Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotion. In: PlutchikRobertKellermanH (eds) Theories of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp.3–33.
36.
PollockPH (1983) The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy: A Research Note. Western Political Quarterly36 (3): 400–409.
37.
PreacherKJLeonardelliGJ (2001) Calculation for the Sobel Test: An Interactive Calculation Tool for Mediation Tests. Available at: http://quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm (accessed 13 September 2022).
38.
RedlawskDP (2002) Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making. Journal of Politics64 (4): 1021–1044.
39.
RedlawskDPCivettiniAJWEmmersonKM (2010) The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”?Political Psychology31 (4): 563–593.
40.
RikerWHOrdeshookPC (1968) A Theory of the Calculus of Voting. The American Political Science Review62 (1): 25–42.
41.
RosemanIJWiestCSwartzTS (1994) Phenomenology, Behaviors, and Goals Differentiate Discrete Emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67 (2): 206.
42.
RudolphTJGanglAStevensD (2000) The Effects of Efficacy and Emotions on Campaign Involvement. The Journal of Politics62 (4): 1189–1197.
43.
ShahDVChoJNahS, et al. (2007) Campaign Ads, Online Messaging, and Participation: Extending the Communication Mediation Model. Journal of Communication57 (4): 676–703.
44.
ŠrolJBallová MikuškováEČavojováV (2021) When We Are Worried, What Are We Thinking? Anxiety, Lack of Control, and Conspiracy Beliefs Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. Applied Cognitive Psychology35 (3): 720–729.
45.
TaberCSLodgeM (2006) Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 755–769.
46.
TewksburyDHalsMLBibartA (2008) The Efficacy of News Browsing: The Relationship of News Consumption Style to Social and Political Efficacy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly85 (2): 257–272.
47.
ValentinoNANeunerFG (2017) Why the Sky Didn’t Fall: Mobilizing Anger in Reaction to Voter ID Laws. Political Psychology38 (2): 331–350.
48.
ValentinoNABraderTGroenendykEW, et al. (2011) Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation. The Journal of Politics73 (1): 156–170.
49.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyHE (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
WagnerMCBoczkowskiPJ (2019) The Reception of Fake News: The Interpretations and Practices That Shape the Consumption of Perceived Misinformation. Digital Journalism7 (7): 870–885.
51.
WeeksBE (2015) Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation. Journal of Communication65 (4): 699–719.
52.
ZajoncRB (1984) On the Primacy of Affect. American Psychologist39: 117–123.
53.
ZhouYPinkletonBE (2012) Modeling the Effects of Political Information Source Use and Online Expression on Young Adults’ Political Efficacy. Mass Communication and Society15 (6): 813–830.
