Prior research reveals a relationship between various political system outputs and the citizens’ satisfaction with democracy (SWD). The current study contributes to this line of inquiry and demonstrates that the perception of the district legislators’ overall performance positively correlates with the citizens’ democratic satisfaction. The multivariate analysis of Hungarian panel data from 2018 reveals that the effect is most salient in the case of the winners of the election, and less so for the losers. Results are robust to a variety of changes in the model. The findings indicate that the focus on individual politicians and their work has the potential to increase democratic satisfaction even if representative political institutions such as parties, governments and parliaments are not able to win the citizens’ trust.
AartsKThomassenJ (2008) Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter?Electoral Studies27 (1): 5–18.
2.
AlganYGurievSPapaioannouE, et al. (2017) The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity2017 (2): 309–400.
3.
AlvarezRMSavingJL (1997) Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits: Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel in the 1980s. Political Research Quarterly50 (4): 809–831.
4.
AndréADepauwS (2017) The Quality of Representation and Satisfaction with Democracy: The Consequences of Citizen-Elite Policy and Process Congruence. Political Behavior39 (2): 377–397.
5.
AnsolabehereSJonesPE (2010) Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science54 (3): 583–597.
6.
APSA (1950) Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. A Report of the Committee on Political Parties. The American Political Science Review 44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/000271625127400147 (accessed 24 July 2020).
7.
ArielyG (2013) Public Administration and Citizen Satisfaction with Democracy: Cross-National Evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences79 (4): 747–766.
8.
BengtssonÅChristensenH (2016) Ideals and Actions: Do Citizens’ Patterns of Political Participation Correspond to Their Conceptions of Democracy?Government and Opposition51: 234–260.
9.
BernauerJVatterA (2012) Can’t Get No Satisfaction with the Westminster Model? Winners, Losers and the Effects of Consensual and Direct Democratic Institutions on Satisfaction with Democracy. European Journal of Political Research51 (4): 435–468.
10.
BimberBADavisR (2003) Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
BlaisAMorin-ChasséASinghSP (2017) Election Outcomes, Legislative Representation, and Satisfaction with Democracy. Party Politics23 (2): 85–95.
12.
BogaardsM (2018) De-Democratization in Hungary: Diffusely Defective Democracy. Democratization25: 1481–1499.
13.
BorghettoELisiM (2018) Productivity and Reselection in a Party-Based Environment: Evidence from the Portuguese Case. Parliamentary Affairs71 (4): 868–887.
14.
BorghettoESantana-PereiraJFreireA (2020) Parliamentary Questions as an Instrument for Geographic Representation: The Hard Case of Portugal. Swiss Political Science Review26 (1): 10–30.
15.
BovitzGLCarsonJL (2006) Position-Taking and Electoral Accountability in the U.S. House of Representatives. Political Research Quarterly59: 297–312.
16.
BowlerS (2010) Private Members Bills in the UK Parliament: Is There an ‘Electoral Connection’?The Journal of Legislative Studies16 (4): 476–494.
17.
BraderTTuckerJA (2012) Following the Party’s Lead: Party Cues, Policy Opinion, and the Power of Partisanship in Three Multiparty Systems. Comparative Politics44: 403–420.
18.
BussingAPattonWRobertsJM, et al. (2022) The Electoral Consequences of Roll Call Voting: Health Care and the 2018 Election. Political Behavior44: 157–177.
19.
BustikovaLGuastiP (2017) The Illiberal Turn or Swerve in Central Europe?Politics and Governance5 (4): 166–176.
20.
BuzogányAVargaM (2018) The Ideational Foundations of the Illiberal Backlash in Central and Eastern Europe: The Case of Hungary. Review of International Political Economy25: 811–828.
21.
CainBFerejohnJFiorinaMP (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
CanacheDMondakJJSeligsonMA (2001) Meaning and Measurement in Cross-National Research on Satisfaction with Democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly65 (4): 506–528.
23.
Canes-WroneBBradyDWCoganJF (2002) Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting. The American Political Science Review96 (1): 127–140.
24.
CarsonJLKogerGLeboMJ, et al. (2010) The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress. American Journal of Political Science54: 598–616.
25.
CekaB (2013) The Perils of Political Competition: Explaining Participation and Trust in Political Parties in Eastern Europe. Comparative Political Studies46: 1610–1635.
26.
ChristmannP (2018) Economic Performance, Quality of Democracy and Satisfaction with Democracy. Electoral Studies53: 79–89.
27.
CitrinJStokerL (2018) Political Trust in a Cynical Age. Annual Review of Political Science21 (1): 49–70.
28.
ColomerJM (2011) Introduction: Personal and Party Representation. In: ColomerJM (ed.) Personal Representation. The Neglected Dimension of Electoral Systems. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp.1–20.
29.
CuriniLJouWMemoliV (2012) Satisfaction with Democracy and the Winner/Loser Debate: The Role of Policy Preferences and Past Experience. British Journal of Political Science42 (2): 241–261.
30.
DahlbergSHolmbergS (2014) Democracy and Bureaucracy: How Their Quality Matters for Popular Satisfaction. West European Politics37 (3): 515–537.
31.
DäublerTBräuningerTBrunnerM (2016) Is Personal Vote-Seeking Behavior Effective?Legislative Studies Quarterly41 (2): 419–444.
32.
DäublerTChristensenLLinekL (2018) Parliamentary Activity, Re-Selection and the Personal Vote. Evidence from Flexible-List Systems. Parliamentary Affairs71: 930–949.
33.
DistelhorstGHouY (2017) Constituency Service Under Nondemocratic Rule: Evidence from China. The Journal of Politics79 (3): 1024–1040.
34.
EnyediZTókaG (2007) The Only Game in Town: Party Politics in Hungary In: WebbPWhiteS (eds) Party Politics in New Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.147–178.
FarrellDMMcallisterI (2006) Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential Voting in Candidate-Centred Systems Make a Difference?European Journal of Political Research45 (5): 723–749.
37.
FerlandB (2020) Policy Congruence and Its Impact on Satisfaction with Democracy. Electoral Studies61: 102204.
38.
FisherCCullotyELeeJY, et al. (2019) Regaining Control Citizens Who Follow Politicians on Social Media and Their Perceptions of Journalism. Digital Journalism7: 230–250.
39.
FrancoisANavarroJ (2017) Are Hard-Working MPs Electorally Rewarded? Empirical Evidence from the 2007 French Legislative Elections. Strasbourg: Université de Strasbourg. Pole Européen de Gestion et D’Economie.
40.
FrançoisANavarroJ (2019) Voters Reward Hard-Working MPs: Empirical Evidence from the French Legislative Elections. European Political Science Review11: 469–483.
41.
FrechE (2016) Re-Electing MEPs: The Factors Determining Re-Election Probabilities. European Union Politics17 (1): 69–90.
42.
GherghinaS (2016) Rewarding the ‘Traitors’? Legislative Defection and Re-Election in Romania. Party Politics22: 490–500.
43.
GriffithJLeston-BandeiraC (2012) How Are Parliaments Using New Media to Engage with Citizens?The Journal of Legislative Studies18 (3–4): 496–513.
44.
GrimmerJMessingSWestwoodSJ (2012) How Words and Money Cultivate a Personal Vote: The Effect of Legislator Credit Claiming on Constituent Credit Allocation. American Political Science Review106: 703–719.
45.
HallaMSchneiderFGWagnerAF (2013) Satisfaction with Democracy and Collective Action Problems: The Case of the Environment. Public Choice155 (1–2): 109–137.
46.
HibbingJRTheiss-MorseE (1995) Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes toward American Political Institutions (Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
HowellPJustwanF (2013) Nail-Biters and No-Contests: The Effect of Electoral Margins on Satisfaction with Democracy in Winners and Losers. Electoral Studies32 (2): 334–343.
48.
JacksonN (2008) MPs and Their E-Newsletters: Winning Votes by Promoting Constituency Service. The Journal of Legislative Studies14: 488–499.
49.
JacksonNLillekerD (2011) Microblogging, Constituency Service and Impression Management: UK MPs and the Use of Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies17: 86–105.
50.
KangW (2015) Inequality, the Welfare System and Satisfaction with Democracy in South Korea. International Political Science Review36 (5): 493–509.
51.
KellermannM (2013) Sponsoring Early Day Motions in the British House of Commons as a Response to Electoral Vulnerability. Political Science Research and Methods1 (2): 263–280.
52.
Kestilä-KekkonenESöderlundP (2017) Is It All about the Economy? Government Fractionalization, Economic Performance and Satisfaction with Democracy across Europe, 2002−13. Government and Opposition52: 100–130.
53.
KimM (2009) Cross-National Analyses of Satisfaction with Democracy and Ideological Congruence. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties19 (1): 49–72.
54.
KlingemannH-D (1999) Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis. In: NorrisP (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.31–56.
55.
KörösényiAIllésGGyulaiA (2020) The Orbán Regime: Plebiscitary Leader Democracy in the Making, 1st edn. London and New York: Routledge.
56.
KumlinSEsaiassonP (2012) Scandal Fatigue? Scandal Elections and Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe, 1977–2007. British Journal of Political Science42 (2): 263–282.
57.
Leston-BandeiraC (2012a) Parliaments’ Endless Pursuit of Trust: Re-Focusing on Symbolic Representation. The Journal of Legislative Studies18 (3–4): 514–526.
58.
Leston-BandeiraC (2012b) Studying the Relationship between Parliament and Citizens. The Journal of Legislative Studies18 (3–4): 265–274.
59.
LevittSDSnyderJM (1997) The Impact of Federal Spending on House Election Outcomes. Journal of Political Economy105 (1): 30–53.
60.
LoewenPJKoopRSettleJ, et al. (2014) A Natural Experiment in Proposal Power and Electoral Success. American Journal of Political Science58 (1): 189–196.
61.
LühisteK (2014) Social Protection and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Multi-Level Analysis. Political Studies62 (4): 784–803.
62.
MagalhãesPC (2016) Economic Evaluations, Procedural Fairness, and Satisfaction with Democracy. Political Research Quarterly69 (3): 522–534.
63.
MarangoniFRussoF (2018) Not All Roads Lead to Rome: The Conditional Effect of Legislative Activity on Reselection Prospects in Italy. Parliamentary Affairs71 (4): 888–907.
64.
MitchellP (2000) Voters and Their Representatives: Electoral Institutions and Delegation in Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research37 (3): 335–351.
65.
NavarroJ (2010) Le Travail Parlementaire, un Investissement Payant ? Les Élections Comme Évaluation Rétrospective du Bilan des Députés Sortants. Revue Internationale De Politique Comparée17 (4): 141–160.
66.
NorrisP (2000) The Twilight of Westminster? Electoral Reform and Its Consequences. Political Studies49 (5): 877–900.
67.
NorrisP (ed.) (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, 1st edn. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
68.
NyhanBMcGheeESidesJ, et al. (2012) One Vote Out of Step? The Effects of Salient Roll Call Votes in the 2010 Election. American Politics Research40 (5): 844–879.
69.
PapAL (2017) Democratic Decline in Hungary: Law and Society in an Illiberal Democracy, 1st edn. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
70.
PappZ (2019a) Same Species, Different Breed: The Conditional Effect of Legislator Activities in Parliament on Re-Selection in a Mixed-Member Electoral System. Parliamentary Affairs72 (1): 59–75.
71.
PappZ (2019b) Votes, Money Can Buy. The Conditional Effect of EU Structural Funds on Government MPs’ Electoral Performance. European Union Politics20 (4): 543–561.
72.
PappZ (2021a) Does Issue Alignment Matter? The Electoral Cost and Reward of Agricultural Representation in Urban and Rural Areas. Political Studies Review19 (3): 376–392.
73.
PappZ (2021b) The Indirect Effect of Electoral Rules on Citizens’ Satisfaction with Democracy: A Comparative Study. Swiss Political Science Review. Epub ahead of print 17 December. DOI: 10.1111/spsr.12497.
74.
PappZRussoF (2018) Parliamentary Work, Re-Selection and Re-Election: In Search of the Accountability Link. Parliamentary Affairs71 (4): 853–867.
75.
PappZZorigtB (2016) Party-Directed Personalisation: The Role of Candidate Selection in Campaign Personalisation in Hungary. East European Politics32 (4): 466–486.
76.
PereiraCRennoL (2003) Successful Re-Election Strategies in Brazil: The Electoral Impact of Distinct Institutional Incentives. Electoral Studies22 (3): 425–448.
77.
QuarantaMMartiniS (2017) Easy Come, Easy Go? Economic Performance and Satisfaction with Democracy in Southern Europe in the Last Three Decades. Social Indicators Research131 (2): 659–680.
78.
ReherS (2015) Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Relationship between Priority Congruence and Satisfaction with Democracy. European Journal of Political Research54 (1): 160–181.
79.
RussoF (2011) The Constituency as a Focus of Representation: Studying the Italian Case through the Analysis of Parliamentary Questions. The Journal of Legislative Studies17 (3): 290–301.
80.
SchattschneiderEE (1942) Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
81.
SteenbergenMRLodgeM (2003) Process Matters: Cognitive Models of Candidate Evaluation In: MacKuenMBRabinowitzG (eds) Electoral Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp.125–171.
82.
StrømK (2000) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research37 (3): 261–289.
83.
SulkinTTestaPUsryK (2015) What Gets Rewarded? Legislative Activity and Constituency Approval. Political Research Quarterly68 (4): 690–702.
84.
SusánszkyPSzabóAOrossD (2021) A Demokráciával Való Elégedettség És a Demokrácia Értelmezése Magyarországon. Socio.hu11 (2): 30–57.
85.
TamaianAKlestBMutschlerC (2017) Patient Dissatisfaction and Institutional Betrayal in the Canadian Medical System: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation18: 38–57.
86.
TókaG (2006) Vezérek passzív csodálói: a magyar választói magatartás nemzetközi összehasonlításban. In: KarácsonyG (ed.) A 2006-Os OrszággyűlésiVálasztások. Elemzések És Adatok. Budapest: DKMKA, pp.17–58.
87.
TorcalM (2014) The Decline of Political Trust in Spain and Portugal: Economic Performance or Political Responsiveness?American Behavioral Scientist58: 1542–1567.
88.
van EgmondMJohnsRBrandenburgH (2020) When Long-Distance Relationships Don’t Work Out: Representational Distance and Satisfaction with Democracy in Europe. Electoral Studies66: 102182.
89.
WagnerAFSchneiderFHallaM (2009) The Quality of Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe – A Panel Analysis. European Journal of Political Economy25 (1): 30–41.
90.
WilsonSLRingeNThommeJ, et al. (2016) Policy Leadership and Re-Election in the European Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy23: 1158–1179.
91.
YildirimTMKocapınarGEcevitYA (2019) Staying Active and Focused? The Effect of Parliamentary Performance on Candidate Renomination and Promotion. Party Politics25: 794–804.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
