Alison McQueen’s study of the historical role of apocalyptic ideas in realist political theory cautiously proposes the ‘redirection’ of apocalyptic thought as a plausible alternative to its rejection. Apocalyptic redirection, so understood, uses apocalyptic language to describe potential future catastrophes in order to inspire drastic action to prevent them. Although McQueen acknowledges that apocalyptic redirection may have certain risks, she suggests it may be an appropriate response to the crisis of climate change. In this article, I aim to show that this use of the discourse of apocalyptic redirection is ideologically problematic. I argue that it involves conflating the interests of those who are at least moderately materially comfortable with the interests of humanity as a whole. I will also draw on the 2019 ‘Stop Adani Convoy’ in Australia as a case study to show how the ideological character of this discourse renders it ill-suited to generating popular support for action on climate change, and liable to reproduce existing power relations.
ArthurR (2019) Shoring Up: Climate Change and the Indian Coasts and Islands. In: DubashNK (ed.) India in a Warming World: Integrating Climate Change and Development. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press, pp.537–559.
Bob Brown Foundation (2019a) Adani Remains Australia’s Moral Challenge, 2019. Available at: https://www.bobbrown.org.au/mr_190520 (accessed 24 November 2021).
4.
Bob Brown Foundation (2019b) Media Release: Stop Adani Convoy Off to a Brilliant Start. Available at: https://www.bobbrown.org.au/mr_170419 (accessed 24 November 2021).
5.
Bob Brown Foundation (2019c) Stop Adani Convoy Heads North from Sydney. Available at: https://www.bobbrown.org.au/mr_190420 (accessed 24 November 2021).
ColvinRM (2020) Social identity in the energy transition: an analysis of the “Stop Adani Convoy” to explore social-political conflict in Australia. Energy Research and Social Science66: 101492.
10.
CrossB (2021a) Apocalypticism as Radical Realism? On the Benefits and Dangers of Wishful Thinking for Prefigurative Politics. Political Studies, early view. DOI: 10.1177/00323217211018407
11.
CrossB (2021b) Normativity in Realist Legitimacy. Political Studies Review19 (3): 450–463.
12.
FletcherR (2012) Capitalising on Chaos: Climate Change and Disaster Capitalism. Ephemera12 (1/2): 97–112.
13.
GeussR (1981) The Idea of a Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
GeussR (2008) Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
GeussR (2017) Realism, Wishful Thinking, Utopia. In: ChrostowskaSIngramJ (eds) Political Uses of Utopia. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.233–247.
GornitzVOppenheimerMKoppR, et al. (2019) New York City Panel on Climate Change 2019 Report Chapter 3: Sea Level Rise. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1439 (1): 71–94.
JohnsonC (2020) The 2019 Australian Election. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics5 (1): 38–51.
21.
KhoslaRBhardwajA (2019) Urban India and Climate Change. In: DubashNK (ed.) India in a Warming World: Integrating Climate Change and Development. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press, pp.459–476.
22.
KleinN (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Metropolitan Books.
23.
KummuMHeinoMTakaM, et al. (2021) Climate Change Risks Pushing One-Third of Global Food Production Outside the Safe Climatic Space. One Earth4: 1–10.
24.
LiuC (2020) Virtue Hoarders: The Case against the Professional Managerial Class. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
McLemanR (2013) Climate and Human Migration: Past Experiences and Future Challenges. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
McQueenA (2018) Political Realism in Apocalyptic Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
McQueenA (2021) The Wages of Fear? Toward Fearing Well about Climate Change. In: BuldolfsonMMcPhersonTPlunkettD (eds) Philosophy and Climate Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.152–177.
MukhopadhyayPReviA (2009) Keeping India’s Economic Engine Going: Climate Change and the Urbanisation Question. Economic and Political Weekly44 (31): 59–70.
RaekstadP (2018) Human Development and Alienation in the Thought of Karl Marx. European Journal of Political Theory17 (3): 300–323.
35.
SomervilleRAmesK (2020) Framing Development: Identifying Dominant Themes about the ‘Adani Project’ in Local Regional Media. Communication Research and Practice6 (3): 191–208.
36.
SreenivasAGambhirA (2019) Aligning Energy, Development, and Migration. In: DubashNK (ed.) India in a Warming World: Integrating Climate Change and Development. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press, pp.427–458.
37.
SteffenWRockströmJRichardsonK, et al. (2018) Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)115: 8252–8259.
38.
SwyngedouwE (2013) Apocalypse Now! Fear and Doomsday Pleasures. Capitalism Nature Socialism24 (1): 9–18.
39.
ThomasKAWarnerBP (2019) Weaponizing Vulnerability to Climate Change. Global Environmental Change57: 101928.
40.
TrantnerBFoxwell NortonK (2021) Only in Queensland? Coal mines and voting in the 2019 Australian federal election. Environmental Sociology7(1): 90–101.
41.
WellerS (2019) Just Transition? Strategic Framing and the Challenges Facing Coal Dependent Communities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space37 (2): 298–316.
42.
WilliamsB (1981) Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
WilliamsB (2005) In the Beginning Was the Deed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
