Intelligence quotient (IQ) is a common measure of intelligence that associates with many important life outcomes. Research over several decades has indicated that the average IQ test score among Black Americans is lower than the average IQ test score among White Americans, but in weighted results from a national nonprobability survey, only about 41% of US adults indicated awareness of this IQ gap. Results from a follow-up convenience survey indicated that, in the aggregate, White participants’ rating of White Americans’ average IQ and average intelligence is higher than Blacks Americans’ average IQ test score and average intelligence and was not driven by White participants’ belief in a universal White intellectual superiority. These and other results could have implications regarding the US public’s perceptions about the reasons for Black/White inequality and implications for the use of intelligence stereotype scales as measures of racial prejudice.
American Bar Association (2019) ABA Profile of the Legal Profession 2019. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.
2.
American National Election Studies (ANES) (2014) User’s Guide and Codebook for the ANES 2012 Time Series Study. Ann Arbor, MI; Palo Alto, CA: The University of Michigan; Stanford University.
3.
American National Election Studies (ANES) (2016) ANES 2012 Time Series Study. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
4.
American National Election Studies (ANES) (2017) User’s Guide and Codebook for the ANES 2016 Time Series Study. Ann Arbor, MI; Palo Alto, CA: The University of Michigan; Stanford University.
AshtonMCEssesVM (1999) Stereotype Accuracy: Estimating the Academic Performance of Ethnic Groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin25 (2): 225–236.
8.
Association of American Medical Colleges (2019) Table B-3: Total U.S. Medical School Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity (Alone) and Sex, 2015-2016 through 2019-2020. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2019-11/2019_FACTS_Table_B-3.pdf (accessed 30 April 2020).
BullockJGGerberASHillSJ, et al. (2015) Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science10: 519–578.
12.
CliffordSJeritJ (2014) Is There a Cost to Convenience? An Experimental Comparison of Data Quality in Laboratory and Online Studies. Journal of Experimental Political Science1 (2): 120–131.
13.
College Board (2019) SAT Suite of Assessments Annual Report: Total Report. New York: College Board.
ČukićIBrettCECalvinCM, et al. (2017) Childhood IQ and Survival to 79: Follow-Up of 94% of the Scottish Mental Survey 1947. Intelligence63: 45–50.
16.
De BreyCMusuLMcFarlandJ, et al. (2019) Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2018. NCES 2019-038, February. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
17.
DearyIJStrandSSmithP, et al. (2007) Intelligence and Educational Achievement. Intelligence35 (1): 13–21.
18.
DerGBattyGDDearyIJ (2009) The Association between IQ in Adolescence and a Range of Health Outcomes at 40 in the 1979 US National Longitudinal Study of Youth. Intelligence37 (6): 573–580.
19.
EckerUKHAngLC (2019) Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections. Political Psychology40 (2): 241–260.
20.
ElmendorfCSSpencerDM (2014) The Geography of Racial Stereotyping: Evidence and Implications for VRA Preclearance after Shelby County. California Law Review102: 1123–1180.
21.
FedericoCMSidaniusJ (2002) Sophistication and the Antecedents of Whites’ Racial Policy Attitudes: Racism, Ideology, and Affirmative Action in America. Public Opinion Quarterly66 (2): 145–176.
22.
FlynnJR (1991) Asian Americans: Achievement beyond IQ. New York: Psychology Press.
GoldmanSKHopkinsDJ (2020) Past Place, Present Prejudice: The Impact of Adolescent Racial Context on White Racial Attitudes. Journal of Politics82 (2): 529–542.
25.
GottfredsonLS (1997) Mainstream Science on Intelligence: An Editorial with 52 Signatories, History, and Bibliography. Intelligence24 (1): 13–23.
26.
HerrnsteinRJMurrayC (1994) The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: The Free Press.
27.
HopkinsDJ (2019) The Activation of Prejudice and Presidential Voting: Panel Evidence from the 2016 US Election. Political Behavior. Epub ahead of print 11 September. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-019-09567-4.
28.
HopkinsDJSidesJCitrinJ (2018) The Muted Consequences of Correct Information about Immigration. Journal of Politics81 (1): 315–320.
29.
JencksCPhillipsM (1998) The Black-White Test Score Gap: An Introduction. In: JencksCPhillipsM (eds) The Black-White Test Score Gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp.1–51.
30.
JensenAR (1969) How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?Harvard Educational Review59 (1): 1–123.
31.
JensenCThomsenJPF (2014) Self-Reported Cheating in Web Surveys on Political Knowledge. Quality & Quantity48 (6): 3343–3354.
32.
JussimLCainTRCrawfordJT, et al. (2009) The Unbearable Accuracy of Stereotypes. In: NelsonTD (ed.) The Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination. New York: Psychology Press, pp.199–227.
33.
KaplowitzSAFisherBJBromanCL (2003) How Accurate Are Perceptions of Social Statistics about Blacks and Whites? Effects of Race and Education. Public Opinion Quarterly67: 237–243.
34.
KnuckeyJKimM (2015) Racial Resentment, Old-Fashioned Racism, and the Vote Choice of Southern and Nonsouthern Whites in the 2012 US Presidential Election. Social Science Quarterly96 (4): 905–922.
35.
KrausMWRuckerJMRichesonJA (2017) Americans Misperceive Racial Economic Equality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114 (39): 10324–10331.
36.
KrupnikovYPistonS (2015) Racial Prejudice, Partisanship, and White Turnout in Elections with Black Candidates. Political Behavior37 (2): 397–418.
37.
LauritsenJLHeimerKLynchJP (2009) Trends in the Gender Gap in Violent Offending: New Evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Criminology47 (2): 361–399.
38.
MorganRE (2017) Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15. NCJ 250747, October. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
39.
MorningABrücknerHNelsonA (2019) Socially Desirable Reporting and the Expression of Biological Concepts of Race. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race. Epub ahead of print 14 October. DOI: 10.1017/S1742058X19000195.
40.
MurrayC (2007) The Magnitude and Components of Change in the Black–White IQ Difference from 1920 to 1991: A Birth Cohort Analysis of the Woodcock–Johnson Standardizations. Intelligence35 (4): 305–318.
41.
National Center for Health Statistics (2019) Health, United States, 2018. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
42.
NisbettRE (2005) Heredity, Environment, and Race Differences in IQ: A Commentary on Rushton and Jensen (2005). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law11 (2): 302–310.
43.
OliverMBRamasubramanianSKimJ (2007) Media and Racism. In: Roskos-EwoldsenDRMonahanJL (eds) Communication and Social Cognition: Theories and Methods. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp.273–291.
44.
PistonS (2010) How Explicit Racial Prejudice Hurt Obama in the 2008 Election. Political Behavior32 (4): 431–451.
45.
PriorMSoodGKhannaK (2015) You Cannot Be Serious: The Impact of Accuracy Incentives on Partisan Bias in Reports of Economic Perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science10 (4): 489–518.
46.
R Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/
47.
RichardsonK (2002) What IQ Tests Test. Theory & Psychology12 (3): 283–314.
48.
RothPLBevierCABobkoP, et al. (2001) Ethnic Group Differences in Cognitive Ability in Employment and Educational Settings: A Meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology54 (2): 297–330.
49.
ScarboroughWJLambouthsDLIIIHolbrookAL (2019) Support of Workplace Diversity Policies: The Role of Race, Gender, and Beliefs about Inequality. Social Science Research79: 194–210.
50.
SchaffnerBFLuksS (2018) Misinformation or Expressive Responding? What an Inauguration Crowd Can Tell Us about the Source of Political Misinformation in Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly82 (1): 135–147.
51.
SidesJ (2016) Stories or Science? Facts, Frames, and Policy Attitudes. American Politics Research44 (3): 387–414.
52.
SmithTWDavernMFreeseJ, et al. (2018.) General Social Surveys, 1972-2016. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
StataCorp (2017) Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp.
55.
StrenzeT (2007) Intelligence and Socioeconomic Success: A Meta-analytic Review of Longitudinal Research. Intelligence35 (5): 401–426.
56.
SuhayEKlasnjaMRiveroG (2020) Ideology of Affluence: Explanations for Inequality and Political Attitudes among Rich Americans. Journal of Politics. Epub ahead of print 22 July. DOI: 10.7910/DVN/A3M7PY.
57.
TranVCLeeJHuangTJ (2019) Revisiting the Asian Second-Generation Advantage. Ethnic and Racial Studies42 (13): 2248–2269.
58.
TuchSAHughesM (2011) Whites’ Racial Policy Attitudes in the Twenty-First Century: The Continuing Significance of Racial Resentment. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science634 (1): 134–152.
VirtanenSVHuddyL (1998) Old-Fashioned Racism and New Forms of Racial Prejudice. Journal of Politics60 (2): 311–332.
62.
WickhamH (2016) Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer.
63.
WilloughbyEALoveACMcGueM, et al. (2019) Free Will, Determinism, and Intuitive Judgments about the Heritability of Behavior. Behavior Genetics49 (2): 136–153.
WinegardBMWinegardB (2017) Paranoid Egalitarian Meliorism. In: CrawfordJTJussimL (eds) The Politics of Social Psychology. New York: Routledge, pp.193–209.
66.
YadonNPistonS (2019) Examining Whites’ Anti-black Attitudes after Obama’s Presidency. Politics, Groups, and Identities7 (4): 794–814.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
