The James Lind Library (www.jameslindlibrary.org) has been established to improve public and professional general knowledge about fair tests of treatments in healthcare and their history. Its foundation was laid ten years ago at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, and its administrative centre is in the College’s Sibbald Library, one of the most important collections of historic medical manuscripts, papers and books in the world. The James Lind Library is a website that introduces visitors to the principles of fair tests of treatments, with a series of short, illustrated essays, which are currently available in English, Arabic, Chinese, French, Portuguese, Russian and Spanish. A 100-page book – Testing Treatments – is now available free through the website, both in English and in Arabic and Spanish translations. To illustrate the evolution of ideas related to fair tests of treatments from 2000 BC to the present, the James Lind Library contains key passages and images from manuscripts, books and journal articles, many of them accompanied by commentaries, biographies, portraits and other relevant documents and images, including audio and video files. New material is being added to the website continuously, as relevant new records are identified and as methods for testing treatments evolve. A multinational, multilingual editorial team oversees the development of the website, which currently receives tens of thousands of visitors every month.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cox-MaximovD.The making of the clinical trial in Britain, 1910–1945: expertise, the state and the public. PhD thesis. Cambridge: University of Cambridge; 1997.
2.
Medical Research Council. Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. BMJ1948; 2:769–82.
3.
LindJ.A treatise of the scurvy. In three parts. Containing an inquiry into the nature, causes and cure, of that disease. Together with a critical and chronological view of what has been published on the subject. Edinburgh: Sands, Murray and Cochran; 1753.
4.
EvansIThorntonHChalmersI. Testing treatments: better research for better healthcare. London: British Library; 2006. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
5.
Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus (c. 2000 BCE). Case 25. Instruction for a dislocation of his mandible. In: Breasted JH. Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus, IX 2–6. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1930.
6.
VandenbrouckeJP.Thalidomide: an unanticipated adverse effect. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2003. Available from: http://www. jameslindlibrary.org
7.
LoudonI.The use of historical controls and concurrent controls to assess the effects of sulphonamides, 1936–1945. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2002. Available from: http://www. jameslindlibrary.org
8.
Al-Razi. Kitab al-Hawi fi al-tibb. 10th century. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
9.
HuthEJ.Quantitative evidence for judgments on the efficacy of inoculation for the prevention of smallpox: England and New England in the 1700s. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2005. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
10.
TröhlerU.Quantification in British medicine and surgery 1750–1830, with special reference to its introduction into therapeutics. PhD thesis. London: University of London; 1978.
11.
TröhlerU.‘To improve the evidence of medicine’: the 18th century British origins of a critical approach. Edinburgh: Royal College of Physicians; 2000.
12.
TröhlerU.Cheselden’s 1740 presentation of data on age-specific mortality after lithotomy. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2003. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
13.
CullenW.Clinical lectures. Edinburgh; Feb–April1772. p. 218–9.
14.
KerrCEMilneIKaptchukTJ.William Cullen and a missing mindbody link in the early history of placebos. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2007. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
15.
Commission Royale. Rapport des commissaires chargés par le Roi, de l’examen du magnétisme animale. Paris: L’Imprimerie Royale; 1784.
16.
DonaldsonIM.Commentary on Commission Royale. In press in the James Lind Library; 2008.
17.
HaygarthJ.Of the imagination, as a cause and as a cure of disorders of the body: exemplified by fictitious tractors, and epidemical convulsions. Bath: R Crutwell; 1800.
18.
BoothCC.John Haygarth FRS (1740–1827). Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2002. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
19.
Van Helmont J-B. Ortus medicinae id est, initia physicae inavdita. Amsterdam: Apud Ludovicum Elzevirium; 1648. p. 526–7.
20.
StarkeyG.Natures explication and Helmont’s vindication…Or a short and sure way to a long and sound life. London: E Cotes; 1658.
21.
MesmerFA.Précis historique des faits relatifs au magnétisme animal jusques en avril 1781. London: Mesmer; 1781. p.111–4,182.
22.
HamiltonAL.Dissertatio medica inauguralis de synocho castrensi. Edinburgh: J Ballantyne; 1816.
23.
MilneIHamilton’s report of a controlled trial of bloodlettingChalmers I., 1816. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2002. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
24.
LöhnerGon behalf of aSociety of truth-loving men. Die Homoöopathischen Kochsalzversuche zu Nürnberg. Nürnberg: Allgemeine Zeitung von und für Bayern; 1835.
25.
StolbergM.Inventing the randomized double-blind trial: the Nuremberg salt test of 1835. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2006. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
26.
GavarretLDJ.Principes généraux de statistique médicale: ou dèveloppement des règles qui doivent provider à son emploi. Paris: Bechet jeune &Labé; 1849.
27.
HuthEJ.Jules Gavarret’s Principes Généraux de Statistique Médicale: a pioneering text on the statistical analysis of the results of treatments. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2006. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
28.
KaptchukTJ.Intentional ignorance: a history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine. Bulletin Hist Med1998; 72:389–433.
29.
DjulbegovicBLacevicMCantorAThe uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research. Lancet2000; 356:635–8.
30.
PerelPRobertsISenaEComparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ2007; 334:197.
31.
BrackenMB.Why animal studies are often poor predictors of human reactions to exposure. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2008. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
32.
TibiS.Al-razi and Islamic medicine in the 9th century. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2005. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
33.
Repertoire du Registre CC. Maladies Vénériennes, et la Chambre Noble. Arch Hosp Aa 104. Geneva: Archives d’Etat de Genève; 1761. p. 53 (18 January),135–6 (6 December).
34.
Louis-CourvoisierM.An 18th century controlled trial prompted by a potential shortage of hospital beds. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2007. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
35.
Ministry of Internal Affairs (1832). [Conclusion of the Medical Council regarding homeopathic treatment]. Zhurnal Ministerstva Vnutrennih del1832; 3:49–63.
36.
DeanME.‘An innocent deception’: placebo controls in the St Petersburg homeopathy trial, 1829–30. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2003. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
37.
EphraimA.Über die Bedeutung der statistischen Methode für die Medicin. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel; 1890–94.
38.
HeibergP.Studier over den statistiske Undersøgelsesmetode som Hjælpemiddel ved terapeutiske Undersøgelser. Bibl Læger1897; 7:1–40.
39.
GluudCHildenJ. Povl Heiberg’s 1897 methodological study on the statistical method as an aid in therapeutic trials. Edinburgh: James Lind Library; 2008. Available from: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org
40.
VordermanA.Onderzoek naar het verband tusschen den aard der rijstvoeding in de gevangenissen op Java en Madoera en het voorkomen van beri-beri onder de geïnterneerden. Batavia: Jav Boekh &Drukkerij; 1897.
