The paper assesses the contribution of Dr Thomas Latta of Leith to the treatment of cholera in Leith and Edinburgh during the cholera epidemic of 1832. The historiography of cholera treatment in the nineteenth century is discussed and contemporary analyses of the use of intravenous saline infusion are reviewed. In conclusion, the reasons why Latta’s contribution and reputation did not long survive his death are examined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GreigEDW.The Treatment of Cholera by Intravenous Saline Injections; with Particular Reference to the Contributions of Dr Thomas Aitchison Latta of Leith (1832). Edinburgh Medical Journal 1946; 53:256–63.
2.
MassonAHB.Dr Thomas Latta. Book of the Old Edinburgh Club 1972; 33:143–49.
3.
Howard–JonesN.Cholera Therapy in the Nineteenth Century. Journal of the History of Medicine 1972; 27:373–395.
4.
MorrisRJ.Cholera 1832: The Social Response to an Epidemic. London: Croom Helm; 1976.
5.
DureyM.The Return of the Plague. Ireland: Gill and Macmillan, Humanities Press; 1979; 8.
6.
While in St Petersburg, Barry and Russell met Sir James Wyllie, 1765–1854, a Scot from Kincardine–on–Forth who had studied at Edinburgh before going to Russia where he became physician to the Tsar and Director of the Medical Department of the Ministry of War.
7.
Circular issued by the Central Board of Health, London, 13December1831.
8.
London Medical and Physical Journal 1832 New Series; 69; 255.
9.
O’ShaughnessyWB.Report on the Chemical Pathology of the Malignant Cholera. London: Highley; 1832. O’Shaughnessy’s contribution during the cholera epidemic and his subsequent career will be the subject of a forthcoming paper.
10.
McGrewRE.The First Russian Cholera Epidemic: Themes and Opportunities. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 1962; 36:229.
11.
O’ShaughnessyWB.Report on the Chemical Pathology of the Malignant Cholera. London: Highley; 1832; 40.
12.
O’ShaughnessyWB.Report on the Chemical Pathology of the Malignant Cholera. London: Highley; 1832; 52.
13.
Howard–JonesN.Cholera Therapy in the Nineteenth Century. Journal of the History of Medicine 1972; 27:386. Howard–Jones says that FCM Markus recorded in his Rapport sur le choléra–morbus de Moscou, (Moscow, 1832) that Jaehnichen injected six ounces of water but although the pulse returned the patient died two hours later.
14.
Letter from Dr Latta to the Secretary of the Central Board of Health, May 23, 1832, published in the Lancet 1832; 2:295.
15.
Anon. Editorial Lancet 1831-32; 2:603.
16.
MacKintoshJ.Principles of Pathology and Practice of Physic. 4th edition. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longman; 1836; 335–369.
17.
MacGillivrayN.Food, Poverty and Epidemic Disease, Edinburgh: 1840–1850. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh; 2004; 258.
18.
MacKintoshJ.Principles of Pathology and Practice of Physic. 4th ed. London: Longman, Rees,Orme, Brown, Green and Longman; 1836; 335–369.
19.
The colleagues involved as observers or as users of the intravenous fluid included Dr Robert Lewins of Leith, Dr Thomas Craigie of Leith, Dr John Macintosh and Mr John Racy, both of the Drummond Street Cholera Hospital.
20.
Anon. Editorial Lancet 1831–32; 2:284.
21.
GirdwoodGF.Cases of Malignant Cholera treated by Venous Injection 29 Dodd, HW. Treatment of Malignant Cholera. Lancet 1831–32; 2: 559–603
22.
MacKintoshJ.Principles of Pathology and Practice of Physic. 4th ed. London; Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longman: 1836.
23.
Dr Robert Lewins graduated MD Edinburgh in 1819 and was a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.
24.
Letter from Dr Robert Lewins to Dr W MacLean. Public Record Office quoted by Morris RJ. Cholera 1832:The Social Response to an Epidemic. London: Croom Helm; 1976.168.
25.
GregoryJC (editor). First Lines of the Practice of Physic by William Cullen. A new edition with an appendix, containing a view of the most important facts which have been ascertained, and principles which have been adopted, in regard to the nature and treatment of diseases, since the death of the author. Commenced by the late William Cullen MD, continued and completed by James Craufurd Gregory,MD, FRSE; Edinburgh: Bell and Bradfute and Adam Black; 1829; 371–373.
26.
LawrencePD.The Gregory Family: A Biographical and Bibliographical Study. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen: 1971; 199–204.
27.
BynumW.Cullen and the Study of Fevers in Britain, 1760–1820. Medical History 1981; (1):136.
28.
BellGH.Treatise on Cholera Asphyxia or Epidemic cholera as it appeared in Asia, and more recently in Europe. Edinburgh: W. Blackwood; 1831: 58, 194.
29.
Lancet 1831–32; 1:798.
30.
Daily Returns of the Cholera cases in Edinburgh 1848–49. Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.
31.
ParkesEA.Researches into the Pathology and Treatment of the Asiatic or Algide Cholera. London: John Churchill; 1847; 218, 238.
32.
SpeckRS.Cholera. In: Kiple KF (editor). The Cambridge World History of Human Disease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993; 649.
33.
RosenbergCE.The Cholera Years. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962; 67.
34.
MacKintoshJ.Principles of Pathology and Practice of Physic. 4th ed. London; Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longman: 1836; 364.
