Higher education is evolving rapidly as globalization, technological advancements, and increasing demand for flexible learning reshape traditional paradigms. In Vietnam, distance higher education plays a key role in expanding access to higher education, yet concerns about its quality persist. Addressing these issues, this study examines Vietnamese students’ perceptions of distance higher education quality using the OLQUAL framework, which evaluates system quality, administrative support, educational design, transformative impact, and social engagement. Through a survey of 383 respondents and analysis via Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the study confirms that perceived quality significantly influences student satisfaction and loyalty, with satisfaction acting as a mediating factor. The study highlights the need for policies that enhance DHE quality and credibility, offering tailored strategies to address the unique challenges of non-Western educational contexts.
AbdullahF (2006) The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies30(6): 569–581.
2.
Al-SamarraieHTengBKAlzahraniAI, et al. (2018) E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education43(11): 2003–2019.
3.
BaumgartnerHHomburgC (1996) Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review. International Journal of Research in Marketing13(2): 139–161.
4.
BelawatiTZuhairiA (2007) The practice of a quality assurance system in open and distance learning: a case study at universitas Terbuka Indonesia (the Indonesia open university). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning8(1): 1–15.
5.
BozkurtAZawacki-RichterO (2021) Trends and patterns in distance education (2014–2019): a synthesis of scholarly publications and a visualization of the intellectual landscape. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning22(2): 19–45.
6.
ChengY-M (2020) Students’ satisfaction and continuance intention of the cloud-based e-learning system: roles of interactivity and course quality factors. Education + Training62(9): 1037–1059.
7.
CrosbyPB (1979) Quality is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain: How to Manage Quality - So that it Becomes A Source of Profit for Your Business. 1st edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
DaudYRAminMMKarimJA (2020) Antecedents of student loyalty in open and distance learning institutions: an empirical analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning21(3): 18–40.
9.
EhlersU-D (2004) Quality in e-learning from a learner’s perspective: European journal of open, distance and e-learning, may 2004 - best paper award at the thirdEDEN research workshop2004, Oldenburg, Germany, Distances et Médiations Des Savoirs 23. (Accessed23 Oct 2018).
10.
EomSBAshillN (2016) The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: an update. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education14(2): 185–215.
11.
EsfijaniA (2018) Measuring quality in online education: a meta-synthesis. American Journal of Distance Education32(1): 57–73.
12.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
13.
FrydenbergJ (2002) Quality standards in eLearning: a matrix of analysis. The international review of research in open and distributed. learning3(2): 1–5.
14.
HafeezMNaureenSSultanS (2022) Quality indicators and models for online learning quality assurance in higher education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning20(4): 374–385.
HairJFMatthewsLMMatthewsRL, et al. (2017) PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis1(2): 107.
17.
HelgesenØNessetE (2007) Images, satisfaction and antecedents: drivers of student loyalty? A case study of a Norwegian university college. Corporate Reputation Review10(1): 38–59.
18.
HollandAA (2019) Effective principles of informal online learning design: a theory-building metasynthesis of qualitative research. Computers & Education128: 214–226.
19.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
20.
JungI (2012) Asian learners’ perception of quality in distance education and gender differences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning13(2): 1–25.
21.
JungILatchemC (2012) Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Distance Education and E-Learning. England: Routledge.
22.
JuranMJ (1981) Product quality- a prescription for the West. In: Proceedings. 25th conference EOQC (European organization for quality control), Paris, France, 8-12 June 1981, 3, 221–242.
23.
KhanBH (2001) A framework for web-based learning. In: Web-Based Training. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, 75–89.
24.
KhanEACramAWangX, et al. (2023) Modelling the impact of online learning quality on students’ satisfaction, trust and loyalty. International Journal of Educational Management37(2): 281–299.
25.
LatchemCJungI (2009) Distance and Blended Learning in Asia. England: Routledge.
26.
LeTTNguyenTLTrinhMT, et al. (2022) Investigating Vietnamese undergraduate students’ willingness to pay for higher education under the cost-sharing context. Policy Futures in Education20(1): 19–43.
27.
LeeJ-W (2010) Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education13(4): 277–283.
28.
MartinFBolligerDU (2022) Developing an online learner satisfaction framework in higher education through a systematic review of research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education19(1): 50.
29.
MOET (2003) Quyết định số 40/2003/QĐ-BGDĐT về việc ban hành quy chế tổ chức đào tạo, thi, kiểm tra, cấp chứng chỉ, văn bằng tốt nghiệp theo hình thức giáo dục từ xa [Decision No. 40/2003/QĐ-BGDĐT on promulgating regulations for organizing education, examinations, assessments, and granting certificates and diplomas for distance education]. https://vbpl.vn/bogiaoducdaotao/Pages/vbpq-luocdo.aspx?ItemID=128510
MOET (2020) Thông tư số 39/2020/TT-BGDĐT quy định về tiêu chuẩn đánh giá chất lượng chương trình đào tạo từ xa trình độ đại học [Circular No. 39/2020/TT-BGDĐT on regulations for evaluating the quality standards of distance education programs at the undergraduate level]. https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/default.aspx?pageid=27160&docid=201316
32.
MOET (2023) Thông tư số 28/2023/TT-BGDĐT ban hành quy chế đào tạo từ xa trình độ đại học [circular no. 28/2023/TT-BGDĐT on promulgating regulations for distance education at the undergraduate level]. https://chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=209471&classid=1
33.
MokKHNeubauerD (2016) Higher education governance in crisis: a critical reflection on the massification of higher education, graduate employment and social mobility. Journal of Education and Work29(1): 1–12.
34.
NguyenCH (2021) Exploring internal challenges for quality assurance staff in Vietnam: voice of insiders. Quality Assurance in Education29(2/3): 70–83.
35.
NguyenCHLeMP (2018) Quality assurance and accreditation of distance education programs in Vietnam: rationale and future directions. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research35(1): 11–17.
36.
NguyenCHTaHTTNguyenT-T (2022) Quality assurance of distance education in Vietnamese higher education. In: TranTNguyenCHNguyenLTM (eds) Educational Innovation in Vietnam: Opportunities and Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 1st edition. England: Routledge.
37.
OssiannilssonEWilliamsKBrownM (2015) Quality Models in Online and Open Education Around the Globe: State of the Art and Recommendations, (The ICDE Reports Series). Oslo, Norway: International Council for Open and Distance Education.
38.
OzkanSKoselerR (2009) Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: an empirical investigation. Computers & Education53(4): 1285–1296.
39.
PhamH-HHoT-T-H (2020) Toward a ‘new normal’ with e-learning in Vietnamese higher education during the post COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Research and Development39(7): 1327–1331.
40.
PolitDFBeckCT (2015). Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. 8th edition. Waltham: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
41.
QayyumAZawacki-RichterO (2019) The state of open and distance education. In: Open and Distance Education in Asia, Africa and the Middle East: National Perspectives in a Digital Age. Singapore: Springer.
42.
SahinIShelleyM (2008) Considering students’ perceptions: the distance education student satisfaction model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society11(3): 216–223.
43.
San MartínHHerreroÁ (2012) Influence of the user’s psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism: integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework. Tourism Management33(2): 341–350.
44.
SchijnsJMC (2021) Measuring service quality at an online university: using PLS-SEM with archival data. Tertiary Education and Management27(2): 161–185.
StellaAGnanamA (2004) Quality assurance in distance education: the challenges to be addressed. Higher Education47(2): 143–160.
47.
SumiRSKabirG (2021) Satisfaction of E-learners with electronic learning service quality using the SERVQUAL model. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity7(4): 227.
48.
TanAHTMuskatBZehrerA (2016) A systematic review of quality of student experience in higher education. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences8(2): 209–228.
49.
UppalMAAliSGulliverR (2018) Factors determining e-learning service quality. British Journal of Educational Technology49(3): 412–426.
50.
WaheedMKaurKKumarS (2016) What role does knowledge quality play in online students’ satisfaction, learning and loyalty? An empirical investigation in an eLearning context. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning32(6): 561–575.
51.
YangZLiuQ (2007) Research and development of web-based virtual online classroom. Computers & Education48(2): 171–184.
52.
Zawacki-RichterOJungI (eds) (2023) Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Singapore: Springer Nature.
53.
Zawacki-RichterOBaeckerEMVogtS (2009) Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning10(6): 21–50.
54.
ZuhairiARaymundoMRDRMirK (2020) Implementing quality assurance system for open and distance learning in three Asian open universities: Philippines, Indonesia and Pakistan. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal15(3): 297–320.
