Based on the qualitative interview data from children and parents in a mixed-community village in tribal areas of Odisha, one of the eastern state of India, the paper examines how the parental perceptions and the context of their decision-making process, shape the choice for private schooling even they have limited income and government run schools have the existence in their walking distance. The paper also seeks to explain kind of mechanisms adopted by the parents, those who find difficulties to send their children for studying in private schools. The findings of the study report that some Mahanta and Sounti parents, who have better income, prefer to send their children to private schools. Some of the Mahanta and Sounti parents manage to provide private tuition and home-based learning environment as a result of their wider access to social capital. On the other hand, families belong to low socio-economic bracket particularly belong to tribal community keep sending their children to the government schools due to their limited income and incapacity to provide them any alternative schooling. Thus, educational choice practices seem to reproduce social inequality and reinforce social exclusion in the educational processes of school and the children belong to poor socio-economic status less gain from the schooling processes. While the study acknowledges the importance of social networks in school choice, the study also suggests to look at the context of structural factors, cultural contexts and parental practices when it comes to studying school choice in a multi-community field site.
BalagopalanSSubrahmanianR (2003) Dalit and adivasi children in schools. IDS Bulletin34: 43–54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2003.tb00058.x.
4.
BaldiniMH, et al. (2024) Listening to Children and Young People in Sweden: Practices, Possibilities, and Tensions.Global Studies of Childhood.14(2): 214–226. DOI: 10.1177/20436106241246065, In press.
5.
BallSJ (1995) Parents, schools and markets: the repositioning of youth in United Kingdom education. Youth: Nordic Journal of Youth Research3: 68–79.
6.
BallSJBoweRGewirtzS (1996) School choice, social class and distinction: the realisation of social advantage in education. Journal of Education Policy11: 89.
7.
BiestaG (2014) You can’t always get what you want: an an-archic view on education, democracy and civic learning. In: Braendholt LundegaardIThorek JensenJ (eds). Museums: Knowledge, Democracy, Transformation. Copenhagen: Danish Agency for Culture, 110–119.
8.
BiestaGHeughKCervinkovaH, et al. (2021) Philosophy of education in a new key: publicness, social justice, and education; a south-north conversation. Educational Philosophy and Theory54: 1216. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2021.1929172.
9.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York, NY: Greenwood, 241–258.
10.
BourdieuPWacquantL (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
BoweRBallSJGoldA (1994) Captured by the discourse? Issues and concerns in the marketisation of education.British Journal of Sociology of Education15(1): 19–32.
12.
BoyaskR (2020) Pluralist Publics in Market Driven Education. London: Bloomsbury.
13.
Centre for Civil Society (2016) RTE: Right or Wrong?Centre for Civil Society. https://ccs.in/rte-right-or-wrong. (accessed on 16th November 2016).
14.
ColemanJS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94: S95–S120.
15.
ColemanJS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
ColemanJS (1994) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
17.
ConleyD (2001) Capital for college: parental assets and postsecondary schooling. Sociology of Education74(1): 59–72.
18.
DeASamsonMNoronhaC (2002) Private schools for less privileged: some insights from a case study. Economic and Political Weekly37(52): 5230–5236.
19.
FeinbergW (2001) Choice, autonomy, need-definition and educational reform. Studies in Philosophy and Education20(5): 402–409.
20.
FoliABotermanWR (2022) Cultural repertoires of school choice: Intersections of class, race and culture in Pretoria and Amsterdam.The Sociological Review70(6): 1220–1239. DOI: 10.1177/00380261221093404.
21.
GoldringEBPhillipsKJ (2008) Parent preferences and parent choices: the public–private decision about school choice. Journal of Education Policy23: 209–230.
22.
GovindaRBandyopadhyayM (2012) Achieving universal primary education: expanding access with equity. In: SleetedCUpadhyaySBMishraAK, et al. (eds) School Education, Pluralism and Marginality: Comparative Perspectives. New Delhi: Orient Black Swan.
23.
HoganAThompsonG (eds) (2021) Privatisation and commercialisation in public educationHow the Public Nature of Schooling Is Changing. Routledge.
24.
JabbedMRajyalakshmiC (2001) Education of marginalised social groups in Bihar. In: VaidyanathanAGopinathan NairPR (eds) Elementary Education in Rural India: A Grassroots View. New Delhi: Sage.
25.
JeffreyCJefferyPJefferyR (2005) When schooling fails: young men, education and low-caste politics in rural north India. Contributions to Indian Sociology39(1): 1–38.
26.
KimJSchneiderB (2005) Social capital in action: Alignment of parental support in adolescents’ transition to postsecondary education. Social Forces84(2): 1181–1206.
27.
MahapatraSK (2024) Peer interaction, exclusion and school participation: issues of schooling in a tribal village of Odisha. Contemporary Voice of Dalit. DOI: 10.1177/2455328X241236648, In press.
28.
McNealRB (1999) Parental Involvement as Social Capital: Differential Effectiveness on Science Achievement, Truancy, and Dropping Out. Social Forces78(1): 117–144. DOI: 10.2307/3005792.
29.
NambissanGBBallSJ (2011) Advocacy networks, choice and private schooling of the poor in India. In: MarieLNambissanGB (eds) Education and Social Justice in the Era of Globalisation — Perspectives from India and the UK. New Delhi: Routledge, 161–186.
30.
NambissanGBSedwalM (2002) Education for all: the situation of Dalit children in India. In: GovindaR (ed) India Education Report: A Profile of Basic Education. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
31.
Office of Registrar General of IndiaCensus Commissioner (2001) Census Reports 2001. New Delhi.: Office of the Registrar General, Government of India.
32.
Office of Registrar General of IndiaCensus Commissioner (2011) Provisional Results of 2011 Census. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General, Government of India.
33.
OliverMLShapiroTM (2006) Black Wealth/white Wealth : A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. 10th anniversary ed.New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
PROBE (1999) Public Report on Basic Education in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
SchneiderMTeskePRochC, et al. (1997) Networks to nowhere: segregation and stratification in networks of information about schools. American Journal of Political Science41(4): 1201–1223.
SujathaKGeetha RaniP (2006).Secondary Education in India: Analysis of Delivery Mechanism and Functioning of Secondary School. Unpublished Research Project. New Delhi: NUEPA.
39.
Van ZantenA (2003) Middle-class parents and social mix in French urban schools: Reproduction and transformation of privilege.Journal of Education Policy18(5): 455–468.
40.
WattP (2009) Education, social class, and urban policy: A multi-scalar approach to school choice, exclusion, and migration in East London.Urban Studies46(9): 1791–1812.
41.
WhiteJAWehlageGG (1995) Community collaboration: if it is such a good idea, why is it so hard to do?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis17: 23–38.
42.
XiaoxinW (2013) The power of social capital in school choice in a Chinese city. Australian Journal of Education57(1): 48–59. DOI: 10.1177/0004944112468701.
