Population decline poses significant challenges to small schools worldwide, including resource management, student retention, and community engagement. In South Korea, these challenges have been amplified by a shift from centralized education policies to regionally tailored approaches under provincial superintendents. This study analyzed the impact of budgetary and legal support, along with legitimacy pressures, on small school sustainability using data from 2013 to 2022 and negative binomial regression analysis. Findings revealed that regional education offices navigated conflicting demands of resource dependency and legitimacy, often adopting complex and inconsistent strategies. The results underscore the limitations of rightsizing policies in addressing small school challenges, emphasizing the need for community-centered and adaptive solutions. This study provides actionable insights for policymakers in South Korea and other nations facing demographic shifts, highlighting the importance of collaborative governance and strategic resource allocation to ensure the long-term viability of small schools.
AalbersMBBerntM (2019) The political economy of managing decline and rightsizing. Urban Geography40(2): 165–173.
2.
AllisonPD (1999) Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods & Research28(2): 186–208.
3.
AndrewsMDuncombeWYingerJ (2002) Revisiting economies of size in American education: Are we any closer to a consensus?Economics of education review21(3): 245–262.
4.
AudiracI (2018) Shrinking cities: an unfit term for American urban policy?Cities75: 12–19.
5.
AuttiOHyry-BeihammerEK (2014) School closures in rural Finnish communities. Journal of Research in Rural Education29(1): 1–17.
6.
BarakatB (2015) A ‘recipe for depopulation’? School closures and local population decline in saxony. Population, Space and Place21(8): 735–753.
7.
BarleyZABeesleyAD (2007) Rural school success: what can we learn?Journal of Research in Rural Education22(1): 1–16.
8.
BierbaumA (2020) Managing shrinkage by “rightsizing” schools: the case of school closures in Philadelphia. Journal of Urban Affairs42(3): 450–473.
9.
BillinghamC (2015) Parental choice, neighbourhood schools, and the market metaphor in urban education reform. Urban Studies52(4): 685–701.
CalsamigliaCHaeringerGKlijnF (2010) Constrained school choice: an experimental study. The American Economic Review100(4): 1860–1874. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.4.1860.
12.
ChapmanS (2020) The significance of context: autonomy and curriculum reform in rural schools. Curriculum Journal31(2): 231–243.
13.
CoxRW (1983) Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method. Millennium12(2): 162–175.
14.
De JongPHellerGZ (2008) Generalized Linear Models for Insurance Data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
de la TorreMGordonMFMooreP, et al. (2015) School Closings in Chicago: Understanding Families’ Choices and Constraints for New School Enrollment. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
16.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–160.
17.
DuncombeWYingerJ (2007) Does school district consolidation cut costs?Education Finance and Policy2(4): 341–375.
18.
Education Statistics Yearbook (2023) Education Statistics Yearbook. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Education.
19.
EgelundNLaustsenH (2006) School closure: what are the consequences for the local society?Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research50(4): 429–439.
20.
EwingR (2011) Curriculum reforms in small schools: impacts on teacher agency and curriculum innovation. Journal of Educational Change12(3): 217–235.
21.
Fargas MaletMBagleyC (2024) Conceptualising small rural school-community relationships within a divided society: people, meanings, practices and spaces. Oxford Review of Education50(4): 570–587.
22.
GinsbergABuchholtzA (1990) Converting to for-profit status: corporate responsiveness to radical change. Academy of Management Journal33(3): 445–477.
23.
GreenTL (2017) “We felt they took the heart out of the community”: examining a community-based response to urban school closure. Education Policy Analysis Archives25: 21–30.
24.
HarttM (2021) The elasticity of shrinking cities: an analysis of indicators. The Professional Geographer73(2): 230–239.
25.
HollanderJ (2018) A research agenda for shrinking cities.Edward Elgar Publishing.
26.
HummelD (2015) Right-sizing cities in the United States: defining its strategies. Journal of Urban Affairs37(4): 397–409.
27.
HwangJYChoHJ (2016) Analysis of influencing factors on the establishment of social enterprises: functionalism and institutionalism perspectives. Government Studies22(3): 237–277. https://kiss.kstudy.com/Detail/Ar?key=3490431.
28.
JinDSHanEJLeeSH, et al. (2014) Exploring new factors in school change: a case study of J elementary school D branch that overcame the school closure crisis. Korean Journal of Teacher Education31(2): 345–371. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE11354678.
KimYH (2000) Concurrent development of education policy and industrialization strategies in Korea (1945–95): a historical perspective. Journal of Education and Work13(1): 95–118. DOI: 10.1080/13639080011225.
KingBGWhettenDA (2008) Rethinking the relationship between reputation and legitimacy: a social actor conceptualization. Corporate Reputation Review11: 192–207.
LeeJLubienskiC (2017) The impact of school closures on equity of access in Chicago. Education and Urban Society49(1): 53–80.
35.
LehtonenO (2021) Primary school closures and population development—is school vitality an investment in the attractiveness of the (rural) communities or not?Journal of Rural Studies82: 138–147.
36.
MargulisHL (2001) Household mobility, housing traits, public goods, and school quality in Cleveland’s metropolitan statistical area. Urban Affairs Review36(5): 646–677.
37.
Martinez-FernandezCAudiracIFolS, et al. (2012) Shrinking cities: urban challenges of globalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research36(2): 213–225.
38.
McCullaghP (2018) Tensor Methods in Statistics: Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
39.
MeyerJWRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340–363.
40.
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (2020) 2020 Implementation Plan for Improving the Quality of Life for Farmers and Fishermen and Rural Development. Seojong, South Korea: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
41.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2011) Regulations on the Allocation of Local Education Financial Grants. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
42.
MorganSLSørensenAB (1999) Parental networks, social closure, and mathematics learning: a test of Coleman’s social capital explanation of school effects. American Sociological Review64(5): 661–681.
43.
Munkyo Bicentennial Committee (1988) Moongyo 40nyeonsa [History of Education during 40 Years]. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Education.
NohHDJeongSK (2015) The role of community for overcoming the crisis of school closure in rural village - focusing on eight successful cases of providing rental houses in Jeju Province. Journal of Rural Architecture17(3): 45–54. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE08863244.
46.
OhSHKimDY (2017) A comparative study on curriculum satisfaction following the consolidation of small schools: Focusing on A Elementary School in Ulsan. Korean Journal of Educational Research23(2): 55–76. doi: 10.29318/KER.23.2.3.
ParkSHLeeSI (2015) Policy analysis on small schools in rural, mountainous, and fishing villages. Jincheon: Korea Educational Development Institute.
49.
PfefferJSalancikG (2015) External control of organizations—resource dependence perspective. In: Organizational Behavior. London, UK: Routledge, Vol. 2, 355–370.
50.
PopperDEPopperFJ (2002) Small can be beautiful: Coming to terms with decline. Planning68(7): 20–23.
51.
PrainVCoxPDeedC, et al. (2013) Personalised learning: lessons to be learnt. British Educational Research Journal39(4): 654–676.
52.
RushowyK (2016) Scoop on school closings: Chapman’s ice cream offers to help. The Toronto Star. Retrieved from: https://www.thestar.com.
53.
SmitRHumpertW (2012) Differentiated instruction in small schools. Teaching and Teacher Education28(8): 1152–1162.
54.
SongDBYangBCKangSH (2016) Analysis of Village Educational Communities in Chungcheongnam-Do and Strategies for Activation. Daejeon, South Korea: Chungnam Research Institute. https://oak.cni.re.kr/handle/2016.oak/4525.
55.
TiekenMCAuldridge-RevelesTR (2019) Rethinking the school closure research: School closure as spatial injustice. Review of Educational Research89(6): 917–953.
56.
TolbertPSZuckerLG (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly28: 22–39.
57.
WittenKMcCreanorTKearnsR, et al. (2001) The impacts of a school closure on neighbourhood social cohesion: narratives from Invercargill, New Zealand. Health & Place7(4): 307–317.
58.
YilmazK (2020) States and school finance. Regional Science Policy & Practice12(3): 539–549. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12221.
