The purpose of this study is to evaluate the scientific production and performance of the concept ‘challenging schools’ from 2000 to today through a bibliometric analysis complemented by scientific mapping. The study resorted to different processes to quantify, analyse, evaluate, and estimate the scientific output by means of specific software such as SciMAT, Analyze Results, and Creation Citation Report. The concept was run through 88 scientific publications dating from 2000 to 2022 extracted from the Web of Science (WoS) citation database. The findings suggest that the evolution of the study of the schools facing challenging circumstances is constant and continuous and has followed a stable trend. The results also reflect the related themes that are of greatest scientific interest throughout each of the decades, climate being relevant in each of the periods. Furthermore, the study reveals the thematic evolution, the birth of new motor themes, as well as others lacking in depth analyses that merit further exhaustive investigation. This study thus paves the way for future research on the subject.
AchinsteinBOgawaRTSextonD, et al. (2010) Retaining teachers of color: a pressing problem and a potential strategy for hard-to-staff schools. Review of Educational Research80(1): 71–107.
2.
AlexanderP (2020) Methodological guidance paper: the art and science of quality systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research90(1): 6–23. DOI: 10.3102/0034654319854352.
3.
BolívarA (2010) El liderazgo educativo y su papel en la mejora: Una revisión actual de sus posibles limitaciones. Psicoperspectivas9(2): 9–33. DOI: 10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol9-issue2-fulltext-112.
4.
BolívarA (2014) Teachers' life stories: voices and context. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa19(62): 711–734. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.5140.7848.
5.
BrownJ (2015) The flow of higher qualified new teachers into challenging UK high schools. Research Papers in Education30(3): 287–304.
6.
Cascón-KatchadourianJMoral-MunozJALiaoH, et al. (2020) Análisis bibliométrico de la Revista Española de Documentación Científica desde su inclusión en la Web of Science (2008-2018). Revista Española de Documentación Científica43(3): e267. DOI: 10.3989/redc.2020.3.1690.
7.
ClarkeSO’DonoghueT (2016) Educational leadership and context: a rendering of an inseparable relationship. British Journal of Educational Studies65(2): 167–182. DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2016.1199772.
8.
CoboMJLópez-HerreraAHerrera-ViedmaE, et al. (2011a) Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology62: 1382–1402.
9.
CoboMJLópez-HerreraAGHerrera-ViedmaE, et al. (2011b) An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics5(1): 146–166.
10.
Coma-RosellóTBlasco-SerranoACDieste GraciaB, et al. (2023) Escuelas transformadoras. Camino hacia la ciudadanía global y la agenda 2030. Contextos Educativos. Revista de Educación31: 27–51. DOI: 10.18172/con.5453.
11.
DayC (2014) Resilient principals in challenging schools: the courage and costs of conviction. Teachers and Teaching20(5): 638–654. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2014.937959.
12.
DayCGuQ (2015) Educadores resilientes, escuelas resilientes. In: Construir y sostener la calidad educativa en tiempos difíciles. Madrid: Narcea.
13.
Fernandez-CanoA (2021) Letter to the Editor: publish, publish … cursed! cursed. Scientometrics126(4): 3673–3682.
14.
GrissomJA (2011) Can good principals keep teachers in disadvantaged schools? Linking principal effectiveness to teacher satisfaction and turnover in hard-to-staff environments. Teachers College Record113(11): 2552–2585.
15.
HargreavesA (2007) Sustainable learning communities. In: StollLLouisKS (eds) Professional Learning Communities: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas. New York, NY: McGraw Hill (Open University Press, 181–195.
HarrisAChapmanC (2002b) Leadership in schools facing challenging circumstances. Management in Education16(1): 10–13. DOI: 10.1177/08920206020160010301.
18.
HirschJE (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. PNAS102: 16569–16572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.050765510.
19.
López-RoblesJROtegi-OlasoJRPorto-GómezI, et al. (2019) 30 years of intelligence models in management and business: a bibliometric review. International Journal of Information Management48: 22–38.
20.
LuptonR (2005) Social justice and school improvement: improving the quality of schooling in the poorest neighbourhoods. British Educational Research Journal31(5): 589–604. DOI: 10.1080/01411920500240759.
21.
MaierA (2012) Doing good and doing well: credentialism and teach for America. Journal of Teacher Education63(1): 10–22.
22.
MartínezMACoboMJHerreraM, et al. (2015) Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping. Research on Social Work Practice25(2): 257–277.
23.
Montero-DíazJCoboMJGutiérrez-SalcedoM, et al. (2018) Mapeo científico de la Categoría «Comunicación» en WoS (1980–2013). Comunicar26: 81–91.
24.
MoralCGarcía-GarnicaMMartinez-ValdiviaE (2018) Leading for social justice in challenging school contexts. International Journal of Leadership in Education21(5): 560–579. DOI: 10.1080/13603124.2017.1274784.
25.
MuijsD (2003) La mejora y la eficacia de las escuelas en zonas desfavorecidas: Resumen de resultados de investigación. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación1(2), Available at:https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55110203.
26.
MuijsDHarrisAChapmanC, et al. (2004) Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas – a review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement15(2): 149–175.
27.
Muñoz-LeivaFViedma-del-JesúsMISánchez-FernándezJ, et al. (2012) An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective. Quality and Quantity46(4): 1077–1095.
28.
NorrisMOppenheimC (2007) Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences literature. Journal of Informetrics1(2): 161–169.
29.
Olmo-ExtremeraMSabino de FariasIMDomingo-SegoviaJ (2021) Construir resiliencia en las escuelas desde la acción de liderazgo. DEDiCA. Revista de Educação e Humanidades18: 69–90. DOI: 10.30827/dreh.vi18.17002.
30.
OpferD (2011) Defining and identifying hard-to-staff schools: the role of school demographics and conditions. Educational Administration Quarterly47(4): 582–619.
31.
QinLX (2019) Factors relating to teachers’ intention to change school: a multilevel perspective. Policy Futures in Education17(3): 318–338.
32.
ReiningerM (2012) Hometown Disadvantage? It depends on where you're from: teachers' location preferences and the implications for staffing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis34(2): 127–145.
33.
Rey-MartíARibeiro-SorianoDPalacios-MarquésD (2016) A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research69(5): 1651–1655.
34.
Rodríguez-BolívarMPAlcaide-MuñozLCoboMJ (2018) Analyzing the scientific evolution and impact of e-participation research in JCR journals using science mapping. International Journal of Information Management40: 111–119.
35.
SauraGCaballeroK (2021) Capitalismo académico digital. Revista Española de Educación Comparada37: 192–210. DOI: 10.5944/reec.37.2021.27797.
36.
SeeBHMorrisRGorardS, et al. (2020) What works in attracting and retaining teachers in challenging schools and areas?Oxford Review of Education46(6): 678–697.
37.
StollL (2009) Connecting learning communities: capacity building for systemic change. In: HargreavesALiebermanAFullanM, et al. (eds) Second International Handbook of Educational Change. Heidelberg: Springer, 469–484.
38.
TamirE (2010) The retention question in context-specific teacher education: do beginning teachers and their program leaders see teachers’ future career eye to eye. Teaching and Teacher Education26(3): 665–678.
39.
YeagerDSDweckCS (2012) Mindsets that promote resilience: when students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist47(4): 302–314.
