The study aims to explore the extent of satisfaction of 76 teacher educators (TEs) and 553 student teachers (STs) with new blended learning (BL) curricular-structural change titled “1 of 4.” Quantitative analysis revealed that both the TEs and the STs had a positive opinion regarding this structural change and recommended adopting it for future learning. However, significant differences between the TEs and STs were related to the cons: creating overwork and harming sequential learning. TEs’ and STs’ recommendations for improvement revealed that the TEs and STs mainly expressed traditional dispositions regarding their roles and their expectations from the new BL timetable. The main conclusion posits that structural change is crucial, but it may only act as the first step in redesigning teacher preparation for the post-COVID-19 era.
AdindaDMohibN (2020) Teaching and instructional design approaches to enhance students’ self-directed learning in blended learning environments. Electronic Journal of E-Learning18(2): 162–174.
2.
AktanS (2021) Waking up to the dawn of a new era: reconceptualization of curriculum post Covid-19. Prospects51: 205–217.
3.
Anthony JnrB (2022) An exploratory study on academic staff perception towards blended learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies27(3): 3107–3133.
4.
AnthonyBKamaludinARomliA, et al. (2020) Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: a theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning27: 531–578.
5.
BenchevaN (2010) Learning styles and e-learning face-to-face to the traditional learning. Научни Трудове На Русенския Университеt49: 63–67.
6.
Biberman-ShalevLPinkuGNativY, et al. (2022) Crisis, coping and growth: lecturers of introductory education courses reflect on the transition to distance teaching. In: Biberman-ShalevLBrozaOPatkinD (eds) Teacher Education in a Reality of a World Crisis. Singapore: World Scientific, 17–40.
7.
BingimlasK (2009) Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: a review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education5(3): 235–245.
8.
BowyerJChambersL (2017) Evaluating blended learning: bringing the elements together. Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment Publication23(1): 17–26.
9.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
10.
CahapayMB (2020) Rethinking education in the new normal post COVID-19 era: a curriculum studies perspective. Aquademia4(2): ep20018.
11.
CahapayMBAnobaJLD (2020) The readiness of teachers on blended learning transition for post COVID-19 period: an assessment using parallel mixed method. PUPIL: International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning4(2): 295–316.
12.
CarrilloCFloresMA (2020) COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education43(4): 466–487.
ChenSLuY (2013) The negative effects and control of blended learning in university. In: 2013 the International Conference on Education Technology andInformation System (ICETIS 2013), 21-22 June, China, pp. 28–31. Atlantis Press.
15.
ChepchiengMCMbuguaSNKariukiMW (2006) University students’ perception of lecturer-student relationships: a comparative study of public and private universities in Kenya. Educational Research and Reviews1(3): 80–84.
16.
ConceiçãoS (2006) Faculty lived experiences in the online environment. Adult Education Quarterly57(1): 26–45.
17.
ConradCDengQCaronI, et al. (2022) How student perceptions about online learning difficulty influenced their satisfaction during Canada’s Covid-19 response. British Journal of Educational Technology: Journal of the Council for Educational Technology53(3): 534–557.
18.
EllisVSteadmanSMaoQ (2020) Come to a screeching halt’: can change in teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic be seen as innovation?European Journal of Teacher Education43(4): 559–572.
19.
FlodenRERichmond.GSalazarM (2020) A nation at risk or a nation in progress? Naming the way forward through research in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education71(2): 169–171.
20.
GawandeV (2016) Analysis of faculty perceptions toward blended learning adoption at higher education institutes in Oman. International Journal of Computer Application140(9): 50–54.
21.
GrahamCRWoodfieldWHarrisonJB (2013) A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education18: 4–14.
22.
HartlAHolzbergerDHugoJ, et al. (2022) Promoting student teachers’ well-being: a multi-study approach investigating the longitudinal relationship between emotional exhaustion, emotional support, and the intentions of dropping out of university. Zeitschrift für Psychologie230(3): 241–252.
23.
HusseinA (2009) The use of triangulation in social sciences research. Journal of Comparative Social Work4(1): 106–117.
24.
KoehlerMJMishraP (2009) What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education9(1): 60–70.
25.
KweeC (2020) The application of career theories in teachers’ professional development and career decision: a literature review. Universal Journal of Educational Research8(9): 3997–4008.
26.
LarkinIMBrantley-DiasLLokey-VegaA (2016) Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention of online teachers in the K-12 setting. Online Learning20(3): 26–51.
27.
LeiSISoASI (2021) Online teaching and learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic – a comparison of teacher and student perceptions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education33(3): 148–162.
28.
LockeeBB (2021) Shifting digital, shifting context: (re)considering teacher professional development for online and blended learning in the COVID-19 era. Educational Technology Research & Development69(1): 17–20.
29.
MaríaL (2016) A review of the traditional and current language teaching methods. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences3(2): 82–88.
30.
McGorrySY (2003) Measuring quality in online programs. The Internet and Higher Education6(2): 159–177.
31.
MollaTNolanA (2020) Teacher agency and professional practice. Teachers and Teaching26(1): 67–87.
32.
ParsonsT (2008) The school class as a social system. In: BallantineJHSpadeJZ (eds) Schools and Society: A Sociological Approach to Education. 3rd edition. Newbury Park, CA: Pine Forge Press, 73–79.
33.
PelletierKMcCormackMReevesJ, et al. (2022) 2022 EDUCAUSE- Horizon Report Teaching and Learning edition. Boulder, CO: EDUC22,1–58.
34.
PinarWFReynoldsWMSlatteryP, et al. (1995) Understanding Curriculum: An Introduction to Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
35.
PoonJ (2014) A cross-country comparison on the use of blended learning in property education. Property Management32(2): 154–175.
36.
RiverJCurrieJCrawfordT, et al. (2016) A systematic review examining the effectiveness of blending technology with team-based learning. Nurse Education Today45: 185–192.
37.
SaboowalaRManghirmalani MishraP (2021) Readiness of in-service teachers toward a blended learning approach as a learning pedagogy in the post-COVID-19 era. Journal of Educational Technology Systems50(1): 9–23.
38.
SchwerdtGWuppermannAC (2011) Is traditional teaching really all that bad? A within-student between-subject approach. Economics of Education Review30(2): 365–379.
39.
SitzmannTKraigerKStewartD, et al. (2006) The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology59(3): 623–664.
40.
SriarunrasmeeJTechataweewanWMebusayaRP (2015) Blended learning supporting self-directed learning and communication skills of Srinakharinwirot University’s first year students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences197: 1564–1569.
41.
SunYFangYLimKH, et al. (2012) User satisfaction with information technology service delivery: a social capital perspective. Information Systems Research23(4): 1195–1211.
42.
TittasiriW (2013) A comparison of e-learning and traditional learning: experimental approach. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science12(3): 67–74.
43.
TylerRW (1949) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
UleanyaC (2020) Exploring effects of lecturers–students’ relationship on students academic performances in selected rural universities. Interchange51(4): 345–360.
45.
VoHMZhuCDiepNA (2017) The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: a meta-analysis. Studies In Educational Evaluation53: 17–28.
46.
WojcikiewiczSDarling-HammondL (2020) Learning in the Time of COVID and Beyond. . Learning Policy Institute. doi: https://restart-reinvent. learningpolicyinstitute. org/sites/default/files/product-files/Restart_Reinvent_Schools_COVID_Priority9 _Educator_Preparation. pdf., In this issue.
47.
XiaoHWangYYeY, et al. (2021) Decoding new normal in education for the post-COVID-19 world: beyond the digital solution. Annals of Translational Medicine9(1): 141–155.
48.
ZhaoYWatterstonJ (2021) The changes we need: education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change22(3): 3–12.
49.
ZhuXLiuJ (2020) Education in and after COVID-19: immediate responses and long-term visions. Postdigital Science and Education2: 695–699.
