Abstract
The rup-rup technique is a traditional incision-based method for bending bamboo culms that relies on tacit craftsmanship and material feedback rather than formalized geometric rules. Although recent computational studies have modeled rup-rup using curvature-based segmentation, most approaches assume uniform culm geometry and do not account for longitudinal variability in internode spacing and diameter fluctuation. This study develops a material-informed parametric framework that translates tacit craft heuristics into rule-based computational logic while integrating culm-specific geometric data.
An experimental–computational methodology was employed, combining craft observation, manual geometric measurement of twenty-one Gigantochloa apus specimens, parametric scripting in Rhinoceros/Grasshopper, and full-scale bending experiments. Two computational models were evaluated against traditional practice: a curvature-driven Tangent-Curve Method and a craft-informed Length-Differential Method. Each model was tested with and without incorporation of literature-based elastic parameters. Results indicate that generalized morphological datasets were insufficient for accurate curvature prediction, whereas element-specific geometric input significantly improved bending accuracy and reproducibility. Furthermore, stabilizing cut width within the parametric logic reduced operator-dependent variability while preserving adaptive material response.
The findings demonstrate that computational formalization does not substitute craftsmanship but redistributes decision-making by encoding geometric consistency while maintaining material sensitivity. The proposed framework advances material-aware parametric modeling for non-uniform natural materials and contributes to hybrid digital–craft design methodologies in architectural computation.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
