Synthetic Biology (SynBio) has emerged as the fastest-developing technology in human history, rapidly transforming industries by enabling novel biological system designs. This paper examines SynBio’s influence on architecture and construction, focusing on the evolution from Engineered Living Materials (ELMs) to Programmable Living Materials (PLMs). This paper is organized into four sections. The first introduces the field of SynBio and its initial impact on architectural design. The second section highlights contemporary ELM biomaterials projects and presents a taxonomy of emerging biomaterials in architecture. In the third section, we discuss a design proposal focused on bioplastics for small-scale, bio-grown habitats optimizing tension and elasticity. The final section explores PLMs, addressing the challenge of developing biostructures that transition seamlessly from nanoscale to macroscale while maintaining dynamic growth and function, as seen in large-scale living organisms. Speculative projects include self-lifting bio-membranes, 3D bioplastic structures, and spider silk infrastructures in a future of programmable materials.
ChurchGMRegisE. Regenesis: how synthetic biology will reinvent nature and ourselves. New York: Basic Books, 2014, p. 243.
2.
HenselM. (Synthetic) life architectures: ramifications and potentials of a literal biological paradigm for architectural design. Archit Des2006; 76: 18–25.
3.
GinsbergADCalvertJSchyfterP, et al.Synthetic aesthetics: investigating synthetic biology’s designs on nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.
4.
BenjaminDN. Now we see now: architecture and research by the living. New York, NY: The Monacelli Press, 2018.
5.
JoachimMAiolovaMTerreform ONE. Design with life. New York: Actar D Inc, 2021.
6.
PasqueroCPolettoM. Biodesign in the age of artificial intelligence: Deep Green. New York: Routledge, 2023.
7.
Dade-RobertsonMKeren-PazAZhangM, et al.Architects of nature: growing buildings with bacterial biofilms. Microb Biotechnol2017; 10: 1157–1163.
8.
NguyenPQCourchesneNMDuraj-ThatteA, et al.Engineered living materials: prospects and challenges for using biological systems to direct the assembly of smart materials. Adv Mater2018; 30(19): 1704847.
9.
AnBWangYHuangY, et al.Engineered living materials for sustainability. Chem Rev2022; 123(5): 2349–2419.
10.
Rodrigo-NavarroASankaranSDalbyMJ, et al.Engineered living biomaterials. Nat Rev Mater2021; 6(12): 1175–1190.
11.
JonesRJDeleskyEACookSM, et al.Engineered living materials for construction. In: SrubarWVIII (ed) Engineered living materials. Cham: Springer, 2022, pp. 187–216.
12.
SrubarWV. Engineered living materials: taxonomies and emerging trends. Trends Biotechnol2021; 39: 574–583.
13.
MeltonL. How to grow cement. Nat Biotechnol2022; 40: 286.
14.
DapurkarDTelangM. A patent landscape on application of microorganisms in construction industry. World J Microbiol Biotechnol2017; 33: 138.
15.
WangYHublerMBhatRR, et al.Carbon-Negative pilot: exploring the application of sustainable carbon-storing construction materials in CMU buildings. Concrete International. 2023; 45(8): 49–53.
16.
GoyalS. A comprehensive review of biomaterials synthesized using the MICP process for sustainable construction. Int J Inventive Eng Sci2024; 11: 7–12.
17.
KumarTSSenthilkumarKChandrasekarM, et al.Mechanical, thermal, tribological, and dielectric properties of biobased composites. Biobased Composites: Processing, Characterization, Properties, and Applications. Hoboken: Jon Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2021, pp. 53–73.
18.
ChabotOLessardLDubéM. A novel flax fibre composite material for stringed instrument fingerboards. J Reinf Plast Compos2022; 41(17-18): 670–678.
VashisthaAKaroutYTrouyMC, et al.Study of transmission and haze of translucent wood based on wood density and hyperspectral analysis of wood fabrication. ACS Appl Opt Mater2024; 3(1): 42–53.
KhaledBHanyNMosaadG. Evaluating mycelium as an insulation material: a comparative study on thermal performance, comfort, and energy efficiency. F1000Res2025; 14: 459.
27.
van EllenLBellingASLipińskaMB, et al.Bio-futures for transplanetary habitats: a summary and key outcomes from the 2022 symposium. Res Dir Biotechnol Des2024; 2: 1–9.
28.
BagheriehnajjarGYousefpourHRahimnejadM. Environmental impacts of mycelium-based bio-composite construction materials. Int J Environ Sci Technol2024; 21(6): 5437–5458.
29.
AthiraMBJosephJ. Mushroom fungus as a construction material. J Struct Eng Appl Anal2025; 8(1): 6–21.
30.
MeyerVMengelS. Patent landscape analysis for materials based on fungal mycelium: a guidance report on how to interpret the current patent situation. Fungal Biol Biotechnol2024; 11(1): 11.
LevinM. Darwin’s agential materials: evolutionary implications of multiscale competency in developmental biology. Cell Mol Life Sci; 80: 142.
35.
CoppolaGGaudioMTLoprestoCG, et al.Bioplastic from renewable biomass: a facile solution for a greener environment. Earth Systems and Environment; 5: 231.
JacobsP. Mouse with a mammoth's pelt makes superfuzzy debut. Science2025; 387(6738): 1029.
38.
AndiaA.Programmable bio-matter architecture. In: XXVII international conference of the Ibero-American Society of digital Graphics, Punta del Este, Uruguay, 29 November-1 December 2023. Rio de Janeiro: Blucher design proceedings, pp. 1776–1787. doi:10.5151/sigradi2023-367.
39.
TeagueBPGuyePWeissR. Synthetic morphogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol2016; 8(9): a023929.
40.
AndiaASpiegelhalterT. Post-parametric automation in design and construction. Boston: Artech House, 2015, p. 206.
41.
WangYDiZQinM, et al.Advancing engineered plant living materials through tobacco BY-2 cell growth and transfection within tailored granular hydrogel scaffolds. ACS Cent Sci; 10: 1094.
42.
BiloriaN. Interactive environments: a multi-disciplinary approach towards developing real-time performative spaces. Lect Notes Comput Sci2010; 6243: 254–261.
43.
TuringA. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci1952; 237: 37–72.
44.
OxmanN. Material-based design computation. USA: Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010.
