This study aims to demonstrate the value of experiencing historical buildings through the digital game–based learning method. A three-dimensional computer game was developed to assess the digital game–based learning method as a supportive hypermedia tool in architectural education. The computer game features interactive game missions that enable students to get a close-up experience of the buildings. As part of the study, an experiment was conducted comparing the digital game–based learning method against other traditional methods in learning about historical buildings. The results of the study show that the digital game–based learning method can serve as a support for lecturing on historical buildings to help improve students’ learning experience.
StyliadisAD. Historical photography-based computer-aided architectural design: demolished buildings information modeling with reverse engineering functionality. Automat Constr2008; 18(1): 51–69.
2.
PrenskyM. Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001, p. 442.
3.
BurryMDawsonTWoodburyR. Learning about architecture with the computer, and learning about the computer in architecture. In: Brown A, Knight M, Berridge P (eds) Architectural computing from Turing to 2000. Liverpool: eCAADe, 1999, pp. 374–382.
NagleAWolfPRienerR. Towards a system of customized video game mechanics based on player personality: relating the Big Five personality traits with difficulty adaptation in a first-person shooter game. Entertain Comput2016; 13(2): 10–24.
6.
KeslacyE. Fun and games: the suppression of architectural authoriality and the rise of the reader. Footprint2015; 2015(17): 101–124.
7.
BrownAKnightMSaeedG. Finding your way around heritage sites: the delivery of digital information to mobile devices. Int J Architect Comput2009; 7(1): 105–120.
RedfordA. Games and learning about form in architecture. Automat Constr2000; 9(4): 379–385.
10.
BrownABerridgeP. Games one:two:three a triangle of virtual game scenarios for architectural collaboration. In: StellingwerffMVerbekeJ (eds) ACCOLADE–architecture, collaboration, design. Delft: Delft University Press, 2001, pp. 95–120.
FeliciaPEgenfeld-NielsenS. Game-based learning: a review of the state of the art. In: Egenfeld-NielsenSMeyerBSørensenBH (eds) Serious games in education: a global perspective. Copenhagen: Aarhus University Press, 2011.
13.
MichaelDChenS. Serious games: games that educate, train, and inform. Boston, MA: Thomson Course Technology, 2006, p. 287.
14.
HulstARuijsendaalM. Serious gaming for complex decision making. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning2014; 6(3): 249-264.
15.
DeweyJ. Analysis of reflective thinking. In: HickmanLAAlexanderTM (eds) The essential Dewey: ethics, logic, psychology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1998, p. 137–144.
16.
SchönDA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983, p. 374.
17.
CunninghamA. Notes on education and research around architecture. J Architecture2005; 10(4): 415–441.
18.
DeweyJ. The pattern of inquiry: from logic: the theory of inquiry (1938). In: HickmanLAAlexanderTM (eds) The essential Dewey: ethics, logic, psychology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1998, pp. 169–179.
19.
PrenskyM. Don’t bother me mom—I’m learning!Saint Paul, MN: Paragon House Publishers, 2006.
20.
BanksJ. Principles of simulation. In: BanksJ (ed.) Handbook of simulation: principles, methodology, advances, applications, and practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998, pp. 3–31.
21.
JonassenDH. Computers in the classroom: mindtools for critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.
22.
NaimanJP. AstroBlend: an astrophysical visualization package for Blender. Astron Comput2016; 15: 50–60.
SchankRCBermanTRMacphersonKA. Learning by doing. In: ReigeluthCM (ed.) Instructional-design theories and models: a new paradigm of instructional theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Routledge, 1999, pp. 161–83.
25.
VygotskyLSLevS. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes (ed ColeMJohn-SteinerVScribnerS.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978, p. 176.
26.
KratenM. Social presence theory and experiential learning games. Bus Educ Innov J2015; 7(2): 6–16.
27.
AgapiouA. The use and evaluation of a simulation game to teach professional practice skills to undergraduate architecture students. J Educ Built Environ2006; 1(2): 3–14.
